Andrew Tate said the most dangerous man is a man that has no access to no woman, is he right or wrong?

Question

He gives as a reason because all mass shooters don't get girls or have girlfriends.

ObscuredBeyond · Accepted Answer

The Vegas shooting had multiple shooters. There's no way one shooter from one vantage point could also remote control the helicopters that were also shooting.

Cue the accused shooter disappearing into a memory hole. Cue his brother, who poked holes in the story, suddenly being caught with 65 petabytes of CP, on a PC from 1995 running Windows 95, which used a FAT32 hard drive that would have struggled to be more than a few gigabytes in size. Often, PCs from that era possessed fewer than 10 GB, or even housed as few as 1.2 GB.

Simply installing ClipArt for your copy of Microsoft Office 2000, if you upgraded to Windows 98, left you with only at best 500 MB of unused hard drive space.

So yeah. He would have had to posses a tape drive on that old clunker. And have CP stored on an entire massive multi-bookshelf library of digital tapes.

Translation: logistically impossible the porn was his. FBI planted it, to disappear him, and get the media off their own scent.

Those FBI are then clearly just as evil as any other mass shooter. But if TV shows are to be believed, the only kitty starvation they get are the ones that are gay. All the rest tend to make a point of always knowing the right things to say to get laid at least a few times a year.

So lack of sex or lack of sufficient mental health can't explain all dangerous men. Some are just consumed by supernatural evil, feeding itself off the energy signatures of political corruption, as if sucking a martini through a straw. DRC Films in 2018 released a film called "Heaven's War," that lightly touches on that very topic. It reads just like a Frank Peretti novel.

What I'd consider the most dangerous men, are complete sexual deviants who are accustomed to getting what they want, but then get hungry for more. They will move Heaven and Earth to get their way! All to reach just one more orgasm, and one more act of sexual validation. Look no further than Biden's cabinet for examples.

CaptainOverthink · Accepted Answer

Men without any venues or romantic options are dangerous.. to society. Nowadays though, most of those unhappy men are indoors playing games and rebelling online which exacerbates their own problems but lessens their impact in society.
If the world wasn't modern these men would be out on the streets drinking, brawling, doing drugs and comitting crimes in general (not necessarily sexual crimes).
Some of them though would also double down on work and make that their life.

First, before modern times sexless meant childless, now..
Historically (genetic data) though it's estimated about 20-30% of men never have children, so that's natural many men fall off the board for various reasons like war, desease, famine, youthful shenanigans and sexual selection. Compared to women where the number is estimated something more like 5-10% due to them being less risk-taking (not dying as much), being protected and provided for by men and because of single motherhood.

Considering this, some of the sexlessness is natural and it's mostly up the the men how low they will fall because men's value has always been determined by how they live their lives while women have had inherent value. This is how it's been through-out history with some variance depending on culture. I know this is a harsh and unfair message, but the world are these things, fairness is a human idea that's been impossible to implement for the most part because we are so biologically and personally different and our burdens so naturally unfair.
We are priveliged in modern times to be able to look deeper and to be able to test the waters a lot more. That we value freedom to the regard that we do.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

No, the most dangerous men are the men with certain mental health problems and disorders. These men don’t turn into mass shooters because they don’t have a girlfriend or get laid, they’re psychos and it’s for that reason they’re often single - they’re odd and/or creepy people. The reason for their lack of success with the opposite sex is their mental issues and those mental issues are also responsible for their violence, they aren’t normal people suddenly developing mass shooter mentality because a girl told them no or they don’t have a woman to share bed with. Of course if they perceive an injustice done to them they may act out because of their mental instability, normal people A) don’t think other people not being interested in them is some sort of great conspiracy or injustice done to them and B) don’t think other people or the world owe them sex or relationships and C) don’t go out and kill people because people don’t wanna fuck them.

melanieeeB · Accepted Answer

He has a point and that's probably why he knows he will profit off of those guys the most with his workshops lol
The lonely bitter guys who can't see that they need some attitude change to get girls and more importantly gain some self love cause getting a girl and sex shouldn't be your main priority in life or the most important thing to you

Lycirian · Answer

I don't know that guy but this is BULL SHIEEET!!!

I didn't had one till I get married why I didn't get crazy on anybody else and kill them?

There are plenty of reasons why people get crazy lose it and kill somebody. Just because they had one thing in common doesn't mean they all got the same reason to kill somebody.

In medicine you can say that because everybody get the same shit but psychologicaly it is impossible to say something like that because everybody got a different past and nobody as 100% the same past.

NewsReader · Answer

He does have a point. It's not that simple because a host of reasons are interconnected. What these men experienced in their childhood plays a role. It is said that boys who grow up without a good father figure are more likely to develop mental problems which leads them to be violent and commit criminal activity. Having mental problems make them undesirable to women. That means they don't get laid and don't get girlfriends. And so on. All those things are interconnected.

JSmuve · Answer

He's neither right nor wrong. Depends on the guy's personality, his upbringing, and his support system. You take a guy with a malleable personality and subject him to emotional distress from a young age without any proper support systems for that individual, then you're gonna have a hell of a mess of a person once he reaches adulthood. Monsters aren't born, they're made. And they're usually made from a neglectful society. This quote comes to mind, "the child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel it's warmth." Another one is, "it takes a village to raise a child. So if a child comes out wrong, do you blame the child or the village that raised him?"

Fromdusktilldawn · Answer

So according to him I'd be like the Jigsaw killer.

I never got the hype about that Adrew Tate guy. All I heard is that he has a big mouth and promotes a gender war. He neither has a degree in psychology nor is sociology and he has not conducted any scientific studies.

He is only making the bold assumption what became a spreading phenomenon: Incels going on rampages.

Still called them "the most dangerous men" is wrong. The most dangerous are those deluded and indoctrinated in a destructive ideology, those with psychopathy and what statistics show: guys that got abused in their childhood and so no love from from their parents and have no sense for whats right or wrong.

WanderingLoveWizard · Answer

He's not wrong but he's not completely right either.
There are many many factors that can lead to that kind of mental illness, and not getting women is a symptom, not a cause.

Andrew Tate is an idiot. Take his words with a grain of salt. Just because he's popular, doesn't mean he's right

Alessa13 · Answer

He is wrong, but he is eluding to the fact that someone who has nothing to lose is more likely to do something criminal. Those that are happy in life, good job, relationship, etc... are less likely to go crazy.

If society takes away everything from someone, then they have nothing to lose and then become dangerous.

Relationships is only a tiny part of the big picture... but even then some men with families still go nuts and kill people.

IceCreamSandwich · Answer

There's plenty of incels who don't become dangerous. So I'd say that's probably not the reason those dangerous men are dangerous.

Also didn't some of the most famously evil men in history have at least one wife and child? So they had sex. But that didn't stop them from being dangerous.

Zandoval · Answer

I mean... if you take decent care of yourself, most people can get laid because its the age of tinder and hookups. But he's correct to some extent. There are guys who find it really hard to get someone, particularly for a relationship due to their bad personality or their bad genetic make up. Everyone wants the top gifts and once they see that they can't get it, they get resentful and take it on the world. I understand them, but hurting other people doesn't improve your own condition.

LazerBean · Answer

That's a very obviously silly statement, but Andrew knows that catering to the feelings of your target audience is how to create a big following and rack in the money.

Exterminatore · Answer

I am inclined to agree with this. I think there is something imbedded within the male psyche that makes sex an absolute requirement and a lack there of unbearable for most men anyway. Not that I endorse fornicating, but rather marriage to satiate that need.

ODC2112 · Answer

The most dangerous man is the one who has nothing to lose, is something known and trivial. If you put men in a condition that they have nothing to lose they will act accordingly by taking what they want and there is no way to stop them.
Stable marriage has always been a thing to control men, now that you have broken the society you will pay the consequences and you will pay a high price.

It's your shit.

virtue2332 · Answer

What he is referring to I believe is the notion that a desperate man with nothing to lose is more dangerous. I think a more dangerous man would be a malinformed man with a lot of reach and ability to influence.

Adam1978 · Answer

I would say no, some women makes men dangerous. So it's not a one sided affair. And lacking women doesn't make you dangerous it's wacky ideas. So being alone or in a echo chamber is more dangerous.

fonduegirl · Answer

That guy is nuts. If guys really feel that way, I'm grateful I'm no man.

SlothySlob · Answer

To an extent he's right, but like many problems that are chalked up to a singular cause, it's completely wrong. It's more than M rated games that make people violent.

Leopard23 · Answer

The most dangerous man is a guy like Brevnik. Imagine that guy had been in the US and had proper military training.

purplepoppy · Answer

Woman avoid these men because they give off danger vibes. We don't make them dangerous.

AviatorTom · Answer

It's true that a good woman helps bring out the best in a man, but I'm not sure not having a woman brings out the worst.

sheenagwapa · Answer

but a guy if he is rich can get gazillion of women though

21Cowboy21 · Answer

He is incorrect. There are lots of slimy men who commit horrible crimes who are also

Part2603 · Answer

Omar Mateen was married like two or three times. So no.

Anonymous · Answer

He is so right, just look at the incels. You can't argue with the facts. It is always the womens fault they can;t get girlfriends. What is very interesting is that all incel mass shooters have Autism.

Pohjolan · Answer

No the most dangerous men are convicted cannibals and serial killers that are given guns and are let loose. This is why wankers are more effective than regular Russian army.

Adaeva · Answer

Mass shooters are false flag operations for the purpose of getting people to accept gun control. And, they do not care how many people that must die.

NostalgiaSenpi · Answer

Andrew Tate is a human trafficker. His opinion means nothing.

Anonymous · Answer

I’m surprised he said this while simultaneously being a raging misogynist lol

SmokinAces2000 · Answer

School shooters are also mostly weird awkward and antisocial so it’s their fault that they can’t attract women

OddBeMe · Answer

I guess. But that no access is self imposed. And the rage is self generated because hot chicks won’t date fat Xbox gamers.

gorydetails · Answer

I mean kinda. As JP says, weak men are the most dangerous.

msc545 · Answer

I am unsure - but he very well may be right.

AngryCarl2 · Answer

The most dangerous man is the man with a gun.

Echosoul · Answer

Much as loneliness can be a contributor, women are people not tools and men are not designated girlfriends.

Mayo503 · Answer

Really …. ?  what a joke….

grega239 · Answer

Eliot rogers...

Asad1ONE1 · Answer

Tate is an idiot.

Andrew Tate said the most dangerous man is a man that has no access to no woman, is he right or wrong?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Is andrew tate right when he says females hate all men?

Andrew Tate said the most dangerous man is a man that has no access to no woman, is he right or wrong?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

Is andrew tate right when he says females hate all men?

We're glad to see you liked this post.