Very good video
Yes
No
see poll ( No such thing as toxic masculinity )
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
Please select your age
Very good video
No, I do not think you can think you can blame any one person for speaking their truth.
Bottom line, Western Society was created by white males... that's just a blatant fact. Now white guys are not perfect, and we fucked over a lot of people along the way and in that regard, history is against us. Or is it? Nobody in that lives in a Western Country are trying to pack up and leave, they all live under the protection and freedoms that have been fought and paid for in the blood of young peoples of all types, but none more than white guys.
At the end of the day, all our heroes and role molds have been canceled out or silenced... no body promotes white males as role models any more... that's just a fact. Everyone can come out in public and take pride in their culture and heritage these days, but white guys... when we try, we are condemned as racists, sophistic, homophonic...
I love how they successively labeled it as toxic masculinity, when in truth it is positive masculinity. It literally not okay to be man and proud of it, hetero and proud, white and proud. But it's okay for everyone else to be proud of who and what they are, and not only proud of it but mainstream it. White opens his mouth and he is silenced by the outrage, by people addicted to their own insecurities and outrage.
Excellent points because you are correct it's POSITVE MASCULINITY.
agree slightly but I think tate's whole thing was about masculinity not race, as in targeting all men regardless of race, he's mixed race is he not anyways? and you can be proud of who you are but toxic masculinity is disgusting, it perpetuates stereotypes about men and women. I've watched a few of his videos and whilst I can see where he's coming from for some, for the most part, he's absolutely ridiculous, he generalizes women and basically thinks women can only be whores or subservient, that men are strong and tough and deserve to take what they believe is theirs. I can understand that people who don't find much representation can like him, but you're liking someone that has real trafficking/rape allegations against him as far back as 2015, don't know the validity of this but it's icky, i think he's a terrible role model
1. Western society? What does that even mean? What falls under "Western society"? Which nations? Cultures? The term does not make sense given the context. So let's use a better term, "White" American Culture. I am not sure why you are trying to create this umbrella for the "West", but the conversations we have in America are not possible overseas. So let's start here.
2. I would agree that "White" males created American society. Because it favors "White" and male. But why you take responsibility for the rights and freedoms that I or anyone else who is not "White" and male have today is beyond ridiculous. My freedoms come from those who struggled to get "Black" people voting rights, the right not to be lynched, the right not to be slaves, etc. And I would think any other community that has had to fight for its rights and freedoms, would say the same thing. They would honor those who for for their specific rights.
3. I see nothing rational about your position that "nobody promotes "White" males as heroes". If you came into my house and you saw my wall dedicated to my heroes, you will see some "White" males. But then you will also see Malcolm X, MLK Jr., Yuri Kochiyama, Chief Joseph, Cesar Chavez, etc. because a lot my heroes are neither "White" nor male. I am quite certain if I came into your house to view your heroes, you would have a totally different list. The difference is, I wouldn't be offended. In fact, I wouldn't even care.
I think the point is here, you really want "White" males to be viewed as heroes universally. Which even in the past, was never the case. The media just portrayed it that way.
4. You can pretend that you are not proud to be "White" and male. That's on you. But the truth is your image of yourself is dependent upon what others think of you. That's why you are angry.
And that has nothing to do with me or anyone else. That is something you have to fix.
@RolandCuthbert
1. If you don't know what is meant by western society or culture, then I suggest you read a book or use Google. Not my place to educate you in your own culture.
2. Glad we agree on this.
3. I am glad you have hero's
4. I am not pretending anything. I am proud to be white, and male. Just as proud a you ate to be Black and Male. And there's nothing wrong with any of that. As long as their mutual respect and understanding of those facts.
I am fixed, no problems here.
1. You are the one using the term. And if you don't know how it is misplaced in the way you are using it here, then I can't do anything for you. Any "Black" person can go overseas and lay claim to being Irish. That is a cultural connection. But you talk about West/"White" as though there is some universal definition, all while knowing there isn't one.
2. But we don't. Why do you pretend that most of your heroes were concerned about the freedoms of anyone in my culture?
3. But they upset you, right?
4. No, your facts are much different than mine. Especially if you think you are somehow responsible for the freedoms I enjoy today.
@RolandCuthbert You sound so juvenile. seriously read a book. If live in Western Country and was born and raised in one you are part of western civilization. It's not white thing or black thing. Your just so impossible to talk to.
What is the meaning of Western civilization?
Western civilization refers to the art, literature, culture, and enduring ideas that emerged from the eastern Mediterranean basin in the centuries before the common era, that developed in myriad forms through the Middle Ages, and that ultimately took modern shape after the Renaissance.
What is considered Western culture?
Western culture is an incredibly broad term used to describe the social norms, belief systems, traditions, customs, values, and so forth that have their origin in Europe or are based on European culture. America, for example, is firmly Western in culture.
took me like 2 minutes to google this shit, and talk like I don't know what it means... when reality you are the one that is sounding pretty silly here... take some time to figure some shit out man it will make you a better person.
2... I do not pretend that "OUR" culture was very diversified throughout history, but today "OUR" culture is, and you and I are all part of that same WESTERN CULTURE.
3... No they do not upset me becaue without these HEROS, you and I will not live in the same country and place we share today... because their history is "OUR" own shared history, and it is what brings us together and make us more alike and not all that different.
4... I personally am not and either are you... our forefather are responsible for it. You are taking part in those freedoms, freedoms we are entitled to because "OUR" forefathers and mothers fought and bleed for them in order to earn them and protect them for us... that is "OUR" history and "OUR" share heritage as Americans. Unless you are not an American?
1. I sound juvenile, when you are using terms out of place and out of context. Nothing you have posted shows any knowledge of terms like "Western Civilization". Your definition is the same silly definition given in nonsensical discussion about race.
Which is. . .
"you know what I mean".
No, I don't. And that term will defined differently depending upon where you are on this planet.
So are you saying that there is one "American Culture" and its origins are from the Mediterranean?
That's what I mean.
2. That statement makes nonsense. Can you explain how that answers the question about "heroes"?
3. I think you need to go and figure out what you believe. It is really confusing to follow your train of thought on this. This issue of history, perspective, etc. is relatively simple.
4. Again, your chain thought on this just appear to be confused. It was you who claimed responsibilty for my freedoms. Then here you claim your forefathers did it. . . or something like that.
I am just saying that while on my wall of heroes, you will find many folks fitting the phenotypical description of being "White", I don't think you will many any who you share much in common with in terms of beliefs.
But somehow I am supposed to denote some commonality based upon physical features above and beyond the beliefs these people lived, fought and died for?
Or well. . . at this point, it is all confused, so I will just wait for a response.
Some of my heroes;
Couldn't attach the images.
Just an observation, but hasn't it been "predominantly" white males who have done great things for this world, and "predominantly" white males who have totally fucked it up?
When some white guy wants to shout "I'm white and I'm proud", my first response is "about what? What have YOU done specifically". My second is usually "be quiet, I'm watching this football game", which is played on the field by 70% non-whites, by the way. However, 10% of non-whites are coaches, front office or coordinators. Oh, back to the subject.
Tate is currently under arrest or investigation for alleged involvement in human sex trafficking and sexual assault is he not? I "blame" those who listen to him as if he's an authority on male behavior and emulate it.
@loveslongnails This the thing I can't understand.
I mean if you are "White" and male, of course you can be proud. You can have your confidence. Your self-respect and self-esteem.
In fact, I would say that "White" males, young and old must be able to look at society and see role models and figures they can identify with.
The problem is that some folks don't think that is something all groups have to have. Perhaps one day, we won't have to worry about cultural backgrounds. But we definitely have to now. Because the point of racism is that some groups are just failures. And if you think your father is a failure, his father was a failure and that the only way to be successful is to abandon your own culture and beliefs, then there is no way your culture or community will be self-sufficient.
And that idea to me simply has nothing to do with Conservatism.
Well, I know this isn't a direct response to your point
Just wanted to get that off my chest.
you're insane
@RolandCuthbert @loveslongnails
Rasist is racist... thanks for responding.
Racist is racist, and sugar is sugar, but I have no idea of your context regarding your reference to me? However, if it's about Tate, I don't really care to devote any more attention or discussion to that jerk off
@loveslongnails You can try reason, logic, etc. all you wish. What comes back will never make any sense.
But at least you tried.
I don't agree with everything Tate says and I understand some of the things he says may be a bit absurd or rude. But this notion that he's a toxic male ruining the minds of young men to hate women is stupid. Andrew Tate never advocated for guys or men to beat women or treat them like shit. He never said a woman should just cook and clean at home and not have a career. He calls out feminism and it's bullshit. You want to find the truth about feminists, listen to the responses, replies and post women or fake accounts of women posing as males talk with pro-feminist extremist talk. Andrew Tate is probably the top 15 or top 20 men out there receiving hate out there. Tate said ideally he wants his woman to be a stay at home mom where he takes care of her. But you know what behind closed doors I don't truly know what he's about. He may be abrasive but he's straight forward and he discusses things in a logical, thorough way. Tate is not racist. I've seen women who are feminists that are racist towards Muslims and those same women who support those racist females don't seem to care. But women nowadays are more catty, more manipulative, play the role of I want my piece of the pie but also feel sorry for me BS. Women these days want the best worlds -- I want the status of women should be treated in traditional ways (ex: chivalry, to be courted, get attention) but I also want to be a ball breaking, independent woman. A female's personality in today's era is awful and women just believe anything they read or see on television so it distorts her mind. As a guy, I want a loyal, pure woman.
She can have her own job, her own life, if she wants to spend time with her family or have a girls night that's okay. But I don't want some drunken ho of a girlfriend or wife to be doing stupid shit. If a girl reads this thinking I am being Mr. Oppressor, you will want the same thing with a guy that he doesn't do stupid shit. Here's the thing, women like to be controlling and society normalizes that in TV sitcoms and movies, when men do it he's viewed as a psychopath. No one should be controlled. Fuck the equality bullshit. Because if women can't take accountability, don't bring up equality then because both won't coincide with each other.
I blame society more. He's one of the only people telling guys it's okay to be a (biological) guy, even if he's doing it kind of wrong. They need someone as a strong example as much as anyone, and no one else better is stepping up to the mark.
Yeah he has said some bone headed stuff but for the most part his views just try and help men be the best versions of themself.
That's the problem. Men gravitate to TATE because there is nobody resonating when it comes to being a man and his proper role in society and life.
No man or woman is perfect but Andrew Tate likes to exploit the imperfections and failures of others for personal prestige and financial gain. He adds no value to society, he just makes money promoting hate and disrespect.
Opinion
43Opinion
The part that really sucks about that whole situation is that no one wants to talk about the fact that if Andrew wasn't talking to those young men, no one who was any better would be in his place. Because that's what allows an Andrew Tate to become famous; he's speaking to people that society has chosen to ignore.
The thing about role models is that we have to work with the role models we're presented in life. A young boy might grow up in a place where his only role model is the neighborhood crack dealer/pimp. And like most human beings, that crack dealer is going to get some things right and some things wrong.
Not an ideal situation, to be sure, but that boy's alternative is nothing and nothing is a hell of a lot worse for him than the mentorship of a crack dealer. That's the kind of situation those young men are in, when it comes to Andrew Tate.
I think he's right in a lot of his statements. I think it's great that he encourages men to be masculine, it's really needed with the pandemic we have of feminine men in 2023.
He's a whole better rolemodel for men than a lot of male celebrities.
BUT, some things I do not like about him is that he encourages men to have multiple women which I think is wrong. He also tells men that they are losers and not real men if they're not rich. I think that's completely wrong as well. How much money you have doesn't determine how much of a man you are in my opinion.
Another thing I don't like about him is that he is very materialistic. He wants a lot of women, and the most beautiful ones, he wants a lot of cars and the nicest and most expensive ones, he wants a lot of money etc. To me it seems like he's mostly focused on the materialstic things and not on God. I think it's wrong that he teaches his sinful ways to men and says it's the right lifestyle.
I do not like how he blasphemes God either. For example he said once that if God sent him to hell he would simply refuse, meaning that he thinks he's more powerful than God. WRONG.
I also think he's a male slut (pimp). He said in a podcast or interview (same thing? I don't know) that he has slept with over 600 WOMEN. 600? That's disgusting.
Overall, the real sigma and masculine man is Jesus. That's the best rolemodel and the person men (AND WOMEN) should strive to be like. Not Andrew Tate, Christian Bale or any other sinful human.
I don´t think Andrew Tate is the problem because even if he was he is just the tip of the iceberg. The problem I rather see that we live in a culture where you probably make good amount of money telling guys how to be a man.
Andrew Tate is the most entertaining of them so he´s well known but the problem is rather a social problem. Many guys don´t have healthy rolemodels in their life growing so they look for something else.
Another aspect is for me personally that it sometimes doesn´t seem clear what part of masculinity isn´t toxic.
Well many groups say a man's masculinity is toxic because it's dangerous. If a kid looks at Andrew Tate and says I want that lifestyle good for him. Better then working somewhere you don't like and moaning about it on the internet like so many men do.
Masculinity isn't toxic, the issue is when people take toxic behavior and traits and then label them as masculine.
@Subarugirl Like what specifically?
Hyper aggression, emotional repression, sexism, misogyny, lack of empathy, stoicism that has a negative impact on physical and mental health, the concept that emotion is somehow anti masculine, weaponized incompetence, not seeking out help when needed, a constant need for physical, sexual and intellectual dominance.
Really there are 3 core concepts:
Toughness: This is the notion that men should be physically strong, emotionally callous, and behaviorally aggressive.
Antifeminity: This involves the idea that men should reject anything that is considered to be feminine, such as showing emotion or accepting help.
Power: This is the assumption that men must work toward obtaining power and status (social and financial) so they can gain the respect of others.
@Subarugirl After reading that, I thank the Lord I knew better than to ever pay any attention to the guy. LOL
@loveslongnails Don't recommend taking masculinity advice from a masculine feminist.
Lol at least I’m not trying to rebrand toxic behavior as the epitome of masculinity :)
@Subarugirl No your just saying things like stoicism is toxic for men which you have no clue what you are talking about. Stop trying to turn men into women.
C'mon coach, I don't need to take "masculinity advice" from anyone, and I'm sure you don't either. LOL As for Subarugirl's observations, I agree with her on some on those points about Tate - and Sgirl and I have been known to disagree, but not about Tate.
@loveslongnails I was talking in general. Her points all lead to removing masculinity as a whole. To say stoicism is bad for men is a gross ignorance on what men really need.
I can't speak to what Sgirl means so you have to continue that discussion with her. The little I know of Tate is that is hyper-extreme about everything. Stoicism is ok when it's needed, but I can see times when it's harmful too. Anyway, I'm not going to be dragged further into anything involving Tate, and I look forward to your next question!
@loveslongnails I was done last week. Thanks for the comments as always.
LOL Always, mate!
Stoicism is toxic to everyone it harms. the endurance of pain or hardship without the display of feelings and without complaint Is bad for you if you have to repress emotions and are unable to process them in a healthy way because of it.
Also if you actually stopped paraphrasing what I say and pulling things out of context, it would make more sense. I said “ stoicism that has a negative impact on physical and mental health,”. Pretty sure everyone can agree that things that have a negative impact on physical and emotional heath is not good.
@Subarugirl Now it's your turn to relax. This statement "__________ is toxic to everyone it harms?" makes no sense. Huh? Fill in the blank. Everyone who has been stoic about something hasn't caused others harm. Your assumption is that anyone enduring pain and hardship who doesn't complain about it, vent, or get their emotions out, is going to "cause" toxic outcomes to others, and I'm simply not buying that. I can go to my punching bag and get things out of me WITHOUT complaining to anyone else about anything. But it sounds like you're trying to tell me "I have to talk it out and show my emotions to others" in order to "not be toxic".
@Subarugirl It's not bad for men to be men. We are expected to endure pain and hardship that is why we go to war and you don't. This is why men take on dangerous jobs and YOU don't.
Stoicism is the endurance of pain or hardship without the display of feelings and without complaint.
It doesn't say it's bad for you or even mentions repressed emotions. You added that crap to it. Thanks for the comments.
@loveslongnails if it doesn't hurt anyone than its not toxic now is it? lol Im not assuming anything. IF you are engaging in behavior that hurts you or someone else its toxic.
No of course it isn't bad for men to be men. It's bad to take a toxic behavior and relabel it as masculine. Stoicism isn't inherently bad but if it has negative impact on physical and mental health then it is.
@Subarugirl Alright thanks.
You are welcome.
@Subarugirl You, and many in your generation, seem to be in love with the word "toxic", and have re-branded it to mean ANYTHING in the least bit harmful, long or short term, but that's not what it means. Toxic means poisonous, or very harmful or unpleasant in a pervasive or insidious way, and insidious means gradually and subtly. People can and do engage in harmful behaviors ALL the time, but that doesn't make them "toxic" in all cases.
@loveslongnails I didn't say it makes someone toxic in all cases. Thanks for supporting my point though.
@Subarugirl I support some of your observations, obviously with some caveats :)
@loveslongnails Okay but what you just said supported my entire point that I was trying to make.
@Subarugirl No, it doesn't, but you can read it that way if it makes you happy.
@loveslongnails Then you must have misunderstood the point that I was making, because it does.
Was there something specific that you didn't agree with?
no absolutely not. people are looking to scapegoat this problem which isn't really much of a problem anyway onto someone else rather than look inwards to themselves.
fact of the matter is andrew tate isn't teaching anyone anything new or revolutionary that we didn't already know. the difference is there is a famous person now at the forefront of manosphere who speaks in a way that most people are simply too soft to handle the truth. this is how he does it.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/3DLQAByqQcYkeep in mind andrew tate preaches stoicism and free thinking thus if he's brainwashing young men to be free thinkers, is that really a bad thing?
truth is... only an inadequate, immature, incompetent person would ever listen, entertain and actually believe any controversial and right down stupid that guy has to say
it is NOT true that he is molding youth, it is not true that he is teaching new generations, it is also NOT true that that normal, sane and competent people out there are changing their minds and becoming toxic masculine men
the truth is that only someone who is already an idiot... it is going to watch this way more famous idiot and they are NOT learning, they were already biased and then they're just reaching for the echo chamber that they so desperately need in their online lives
what does Andrew Tate say specifically that young men should not listen too? it's easy to generalize someone since we are on the internet.
to all of the stupid things he has said, of course... which are plenty
He's never said anything that you agree with? Anything at all?
I have disagreed with everyone in my life, in some things... even with my best and greatest and closest people in this life and the others, lol
now that does not mean anything much... that only distracts from the fact that he has said a lot of stupid and ill intentioned things
and they are of course, all biased and intended to be controversial
now, a more interesting question would be... do you as dating coach agree with the stupid controversial things he says?
if I bring them up, will you be willing and ready to defend and justify all of his takes that are wrong?
or are you going to claim that just because you can agree on one thing with someone, then somehow all of the stupidity they spit out is somewhat justified or validated?
or are you going to claim that just because you can agree on one thing with someone, then somehow all of the stupidity they spit out is somewhat justified or validated?
I would argue this is what you are doing because if we sat down and looked at 80% of his clips you would probably agree that it's a good message. He has said some bone headed stuff but for the most part his message is on point. Are you saying he has said more boneheaded stuff then stuff that makes sense for men? If so you would need to bring receipts on that because I don't see it.
a truly intelligent person, worth of consideration is able to bring a positive, truly and helpful message with a 100% of positive, truly and helpful input
90/10 does not work...
80/20 does not work...
70/30 does not work...
making it about percentage does not work... that is justifying wrong, because you know absolutely better than most, that inadequate men which are your clients... do tend to fixate at only the wrong things, don't they?
even if it is as little as 5% or 2%... the men you charge money to help them do fixate on that little percent that is wrong and then they go use it as the excuse to mess up their entire lives
or go ahead and tell me, that you were able to help one of your clients as soon as you gave them one single piece of advice and that worked just like magic... if that ever happened I am sure it is the exception, and not the rule
well, it is the same with all of the idiots that see that idiotic guy as the one to represent them
Nobody said Tate represents anyone. You are way off topic making it personal for whatever reason. I work with women not men. So I can't answer your questions that are unrelated to this post. So lets just agree to disagree and move on because you're all over the place.
allow me to take your own words for what I mean about represent and let's change to resonate
" That's the problem. Men gravitate to TATE because there is nobody resonating when it comes to being a man and his proper role in society and life. "
yes, a lot of idiotic men do resonate with all the stupid things that Tate has to claim... as simple as that
inadequate and damaged people are the biased ones looking to RESONATE in the echo chamber that he provides, as simple as that... again
Idiotic men might resonate with you is that your fault? I think men overall get a good message from TATE and can filter out the stupid character he plays. Now if you can't that is on you.
inadequate men... only look for bias from characters like him
any good message he could bring, it is no different than you can bring here at G@G
the truth here is, actual good and great men... do not need to listen to an idiot to better up their lives
Young men need role models. If they gravitate to him they’re doing pretty good! Thanks for the comments always appreciated.
he certainly did good at doing something wrong
he knows how to fish for weakest of the males out there... there is no denying that
Sooo what good advice has he been giving men name them? What type of things has he said about women that is true?
@hollubollu95 Go google it if you really want to know.
I'm asking u. Ofc everything he says I'll see as nonsense but if u actually believe he is in the right what has he taught men about women which u think is correct
@hollubollu95 Yeah not here to defend the guy. Thanks for the comments.
U have been defending him yet when backed u can't say anything lol
@hollubollu95 Again thanks for the comments.
@hollubollu95 I posted a video saying all that needs to be said. HOW about you watch it? There's an idea
@hollubollu95 And don't be so rude. This is a family friendly website.
Shut up hypocrite
Blame him? Lots of men were being stupid long before Tate… But i think he normalized it and has been misleading men. There’s a toxic narrative being spread by the media; I fully agree. But Tate just takes the men who say, “Im not like that dont feel like that and this makes me feel bad” And turns them into the kinda men they were offended to be compared to in the first place. Better to turn to Jordan Peterson or a pastor, or someone whose actually moral and good, and promotes healthy relationship with a man’s masculinity and his role in society and his family as a man.
They keep demonizing and ruining every male role model that comes along and it causes each consecutive one to get progressively more and more vocal, controversial unapologetic and abrasive. Even outside of male/female relations. Remember when George Bush Jr. And Mitt Romney were “fascists”? That brought about Trump. Remember when Jordan Peterson was “literally Hitler”? That brought about Andrew Tate.
On a side note, women seem to be demonstrating far more “toxic masculine” traits than I see in the majority of men these days.
The question is weird. I don't begrudge Tate for his grift. If a bunch of dudes are willing to give you money and support simply for telling them how to be masculine, make that money while you can. Shoot, I would do the same thing, if I was being sent free money.
This term "toxic masculinity" is weird. I don't know who created it or really understand what purpose.
When I think of the term, I divorce it from all the political nonsense it is used for. And I think of it simply in terms of what men are supposed to bring to the community/society that they live in. They are supposed to provide, bring stability, and create this environment for families to survive and thrive.
Toxic masculinity would seem to be the behaviors/beliefs that destroy stability or prevent families from being able to survive.
But not many folks seem to be able to talk about things in a rational manner.
The question is spot on. I want to see who blames Andrew Tate for teaching men toxic masculinity. Nothing weird about toxic masculinity it's been around since the 80's and used against men ferociously starting around 2010. I personally don't believe in toxic masculinity. I think it's a made up term by groups who want men to be raised like girls and that the masculine side of a man is dangerous. Well it is dangerous and necessary when shit goes down. Hey thanks for the comment though always appreciated.
"This term "toxic masculinity" is weird. I don't know who created it or really understand what purpose."
It was created by the political Left, to demonize ALL masculinity. They define ANY masculinity as "toxic". It is their "political Calvinball" (term derived from the comic strip about the kid and his stuffed tiger imaginary friend). Their agenda is as follows:
1. Destroy families further, so as to have more of their statist power to "fill the void" that they created.
2. To weaken any opposition to said statist agenda, by creating weak men who cannot stand up to it.
3. Another pretext for taking away the freedoms and liberties of people, in a very insidious way, which is,
4. to pit one group of citizenry against another, while they consolidate their statist power.
@coachTanthony So in other words, as I suspected, it is more akin to how the word feminism is used here. You are not interested in the concept that there could be a destructive form of masculinity that harms community, stability, and growth.
You simply want to argue in favor of masculine imagery, right?
Tate appears "strong" because he works out. He is confident when it comes to approaching women, getting sex, etc. And he can be violent when he has to be.
None of which actually helps to build a stable society. But it does feed the ego of certain guys who like the imagery and not the actual hard work that men must put in to have a functioning society.
Interesting.
Dude I had the utmost respect for you but you aren't making any sense at all dude.
@Curmudgeon
1. I agree that women cannot define masculinity. But this notion that there are no forms of masculinity that not harmful to the community is not rational. Of course there are. I mean, here you are talking about families. You don't know of any issues in masculinity that can cause destruction of families?
2. I have no idea what this even means. A state with weak men is a weak state. Who do you think runs the state? Lizards? Aliens? WTF?
3. Again, this makes nonsense. Everyone needs to sit down and ask one question. What makes for a strong strong nation? Because it isn't "individuals".
4. Again, this is nonsensical. Families only exist with men and women. And even if there are other types of families, if they offer no stable environment for children to grow up, then the nation will fall.
I tell you what.
Look at this "Take".
And see if it makes sense.
Because if it does. . . just what did you miss in my post to you?
What Are Masculine Traits? ↗
@RolandCuthbert I was going to respond to you vs. @coachTanthony, but hey, great on you keeping this alive. OK!
1. You are most certainly correct; there *are* certain destructive forms of masculinity in certain subcultures. Yet anyone who dares point this TRULY toxic masculinity out is smeared as "racist" or worse, by the *very same* who call other masculinity that they don't like "toxic" . Even when it is not toxic at all, and they are simply smearing those who stand in opposition to their agenda of making Government bigger and the individual, his or her family, and his or her private associations like churches, civic organizations, etc. smaller. And worse still, REAL toxic masculinity will be not only condoned, but even celebrated as "keeping it real". So their agenda to increase statist power is to make one group of men into effeminate "soyboys" and another group of men into sad criminals that they can then step in to lock up and justify the power needed for that. Either way, the men involved lose. (And I think, deep down, you know this)
And this does not change even if those pointing out the destructive behavior are from the very same ethnic groups and have volumes of scholarly research. They either demonize such scholars like Thomas Sowell as "Uncle Toms", and Mr. Sowell even at the very old age of 92 is sharper than all of his disgusting detractors put together. (He will be missed when he passes on - one of the last of the Honest Academics).
@RolandCuthbert 1. (continued)
Or, if such men are celebrities, like Bill Cosby, their decades old youthful indiscretions will be dug up and they will be destroyed. No accident the timing of those charges, don't tell me otherwise. Whatever his actual guilt, Mr. Cosby was spot on when he pointed out that he and his childhood peers like "Fat Albert" Robinson, "Dumb Donald", "Mushmouth" and his brother Rudy, real people who were his source material, even if embellished for laughs, had it better than all too many youth today, in spite of less affluence and much more real discrimination in those days, because he and they had two parent Mom and Dad families. (And deep down I think you know this too.)
2. Really? You think men of the ruling classes are not all too happy to tear down other men who may oppose them one day, so they can stay on top, even as the society is crumbling? That happens all the time and we are seeing it now. Even if it does make weaker men, as long as they stay on top they don't care. They will even make cahoots with radical feminists to do it, hence the "wokeness" that has even infiltrated corporate boardrooms now. Who do I think run the state? Compared to little old me, THEY do.
Do you really think men as strangers to each other have the male equivalent of "Sisterhood" with each other? That never has been and never will be. Even the men who do have "old-boy network" bonds had to have that significant common bonding experience: academic, fraternity, military service, etc. Men as men who are otherwise strangers to each other simply don't have any common bond.
@RolandCuthbert And here #3 and #4 come in. All the traits you list in that MyTake are wonderful and excellent. And you DON'T think that such traits make it harder for would-be tyrants? Really?
No.
People have been crying about toxic masculinity before anyone even knew who he was.
I'm not saying I agree with everything he says, but he's basically telling men to be traditional, think logically and be the best they can be.
Anyone who questions or calls out the modern feminist crap will be called all sorts of names.
He's even says men should protect and provide for women and given some of the deluded standards some women have, you can't say they don't agree with those parts, because they're 'old fashioned', despite not being traditional themselves.
Whilst I'm not traditional myself, tradition has worked for many throughout the years and I do think most will be happy with it, although the exceptions also have the right to live their life how they want too e. g. homosexuals, unmarried couples, childless couples, etc.
Do you mean the recently arrested for human trafficking so he could sexually exploit 6 women Andrew Tate?
THAT Andrew Tate should be executed or, at minimum, spend the rest of his life in prison in Romania where he'll eventually be sexually exploited, if you know what I mean. I don't know if they have Vaseline in Romania, but he's going to need it.
Here’s how to beat toxic men like Andrew Tate
Without urgent intervention we may end up with a lost generation of young men
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/andrew-tate-appeal-quran-court-case-b2260092.html
I put no. I mean compare it to the messages being sent by some rappers, that a lot of my peers seemed so obsessed with when I was younger. It glorified shit that will get you in jail fast... sort of like Tate is right now.
Tate's message had more to it than just pure evil-sounding shit.
I don't know much about Tate or care about him, but no. I wouldn't blame him alone because there are plenty of other YouTube users that said the same things.
I think many who hate tate hasn't seen much of him in my view. I had to do the research for some of my IG shows so has he said some stupid shit yep. Is most of his message positive for men yes also.
For all the recent things that have come out about Andrew Tate it doesn't take away the fact that there was some truth to some of his statements. Some were total batshit but that's a matter of opinion
He has some some stupid shit but haven't we all.
Well his stupid shot is off the charts compared to mine. I've done some daft stuff but I've never gotten involved in human trafficking. With the new information coming to light I do now believe he's dangerous, not for toxic masculinity but a danger to women as he see's them as products to make himself rich
I blame GaG. Their algorithm favors questions from pinkos, which exploit stereotypes about the male gender. The penis size questions, like the one asked by @purplepoppy today are intended to emasculate and humiliate us. In addition, they have suppressed my religious belief that I am the Lord and Master of my slaves and own their vagina as property.
People can intend on doing whatever. Nobody or nothing will ever emasculate or humiliate me. I have always like @purplepoppy questions. If I don't like one then I will move on to something else and certainly won't hold it against her for asking what she wants.
My penis question today had nothing to do with emasculating men I was simply asking for OPINIONS on a piece of research that has been quoted in numerous newspapers today.
@purplepoppy We all know you read the Misandrist Daily Post. I swear you must have a PhD in brainwashing. First you warm them up with some Food & Beverage topics, then you cut their junk off. Even @coachTanthony falls for it. I will not rest until you call me "Master."
@bean2k21 Not falling for you're slop of a message here that is for sure. lol
@coachTanthony Of course, defend a platform that wants you to be an incapable simp. That's why you have followers and I have slaves.
OMG you're so awesome how can I be more like bean burrito here lol
@coachTanthony I'm not exactly sure, but was Posiedon sure why he was the god of the ocean? Zeus just made him that way. All I know is if you follow my three commandments, you will find entry into the orgasmosphere.
@coachTanthony Commandment 1: You must call me "Sir" or "Master"
Commandment 2: You must ask for permission to stimulate your genitals
Commandment 3: You must think of me when your reach a moment of climax
- References available upon request
LOL I'm starting to like you watch out.
I wish I had a penny for every time I've been emasculated and humiliated by @purplepoppy.
No, I don't. The things Andrew Tate says and teaches are just encouraging guys to respect themselves and do the things that make them strong, confident and valuable to women and society. The only reason he is accused of "teaching young men toxic masculinity" is because he doesn't toe the feminist / liberal party line.
So many males today are raised to be soft and un-masculine, and a society without masculine men is one that is heading for disaster. We as a society need to stop shaming men for being masculine. We should be encouraging masculinity, not discouraging it, because a strong, healthy society cannot endure without it, despite what feminists and liberals believe.
Tate is part of a movement to combat the effects of feminism and revive masculinity in the face of very unfavorable odds. It is in the interest of ALL of us, whether some of us realize it or not, that the efforts of Tate and people like him succeed.
There's literally truckloads of grifters who make a living off young men who are frustrated, disillusioned, having trouble in life, not doing well in dating etc. And a lot of them wanna get you to vote conservative too lol. I never heard of this guy everyone started talking about him. But 10 years ago there were people doing the same thing already.
Why is besides one article in the news where this guy is arrested & charged. GAG is the only place I hear about this guy?
You spend too much time on here and not any place else where he is being talked about? lol
I blame Tate for taking toxic behavior and relabeling it as masculinity.
His 5 wives ain't complaining though
@Aakash_Hangargi Hard to complain when your locked in a dungeon by an abusive dick that controls every aspect of your life and communication.
Have seen his wife supporting him though
@Aakash_Hangargi Sounds like she is the next Ghislaine Maxwell.
in my opinion men who are interested in Andrew Tate and similar already have an inner toxicity.
Can you explain why?
Wish they had an eye roll emoji lol
Eh... he's going to regret that video, as Andrew Is getting convicted for various crimes, where those teachers are not...
The issues with Andrew isn't his "teaching" but the fact he got where he got, through illegal and nefarious means. But tried to preach "do as I say, not as I do."
You can also add your opinion below!