Anti choicers, would you be ok with abortion if for every abortion you or your partner had, you both got a 30% tax write off?

[Agape93]

[lightbulb27]

I'm not anti choice, I'm for people murdering their offspring as early as possible before they fail to parent them and as early as possible so the life experiences and remembers less pain and suffering. I can see putting an end date on it, else kids gonna get murdered well up into the teens, maybe even as adults... thats another concept... unlimited abortion rights... the right to terminate your offspring at any time in life. I might vote for that, instills discipline in society.

I don't understand the tax benefit. basically, pay someone to have an abortion? You'll have inner city idiots making a living on that. generally not a good idea.

Oddly, there is law in my state that pays $$$$ if someone loses a child, I don't think that includes abortion. Reason being, there are some costs involved in burial and such at a terrible time, so society wants to pay and help them with their loss. Not sure I agree with that, but democrats are always considerate with others money.

not to push the "God" message, but as it is... we are all going to die and turn into dust that gets sucked into a black hole and compressed into the size of a walnut and then probably at some point, blow back up into some neutron star, disbursed over space, and start over again. In other words, we get recycled. We should revere that power, appreciate our time... in time and space, and be thankful that we are some of the few fortunate that "made it" to survive, when so many others do not.

Thus, I favor life.

[NYCQuestions1976]

Casual sex would probably increase exponentially, so yes.

[Agape93]

Good man!

[NYCQuestions1976]

I'd even just settle for keeping my own money in my own pocket, and letting the casual female of the weekend get the tax write-off.

"My body, my choice, my wallet."
"Her body, her choice, her wallet."

[msmissydc]

Not an anti choicer, but wouldn't that make, every single one who agrees to that, a hypocrite? I mean its literally money for abortions. aren't they all about unborn life protection without concern for everything else like money or health?

Maybe its not obvious but this would make abortions the opposite of what they should be used for.

[Agape93]

Yeap but I want to see how these logic deprived tyrants think of it. I have another one for tomorrow that I know will make them mad.

[Paul_in_Indy]

I think that you need people who don’t pay attention to logic for this question. I really have no idea what you’re trying to ask.

[msmissydc]

@Paul_in_Indy What is so hard to understand? its a simple question.

[Paul_in_Indy]

Well… No. On the face, it’s ridiculous. Thinking about it, it makes less sense. What would we be writing off? 30% of the price of the abortion would be a tax deduction? Why? But, on top of that, you seem to be suggesting to people who wish to avoid murdering unborn children, that it would be more fulfilling to terminate their child’s life if there was a tax advantage? What are you talking about?

[Paul_in_Indy]

You’re saying that people who value the lives of unborn children are in attentive to logic? So, those people just don’t understand that the child they care for should be a tax break? People who value the lives of children, aren’t going to choose abortion. And the “logic “of lobbying for a tax break, doesn’t have any bearing on it.

[msmissydc]

@Paul_in_Indy Yes thats exactly the case the question is ridiculous and no real pro choicer would argue that this is the right way but She asked anti choicers and they sometimes lack a bit of logic and may like this idea. On the other hand they argue that they have the moral higher ground so this shouldn't be an option to them right? If no one likes this fine, hopefully that is the case I dont want them to look worse than they already are. Also note and this may not intentional but I see it as a big difference: she asked anti-choice not pro-life. On a personal level you can be pro life and decide not to have an abortion as long as you dont take away this decision from others. Anti-choice on the other hand would take away this option from anyone.

[Paul_in_Indy]

Whatever. No one who believes in the sanctity of life would choose to terminate a pregnancy for a tax break. Even someone open to the idea of abortion wouldn’t decide to end a pregnancy for a tax break.

It’s funny because the framing and asking of this question shows a marked lack of logical thought. …and it seems intended to mock of the “logic” of others.

No one needs to justify the “logic” of their decision to carry an unplanned/unwanted pregnancy. A couple deciding to have their baby—even for reasons you consider “illogical”—are not “anti-choice. And they certainly aren’t idiots who just can;t think well enough to want to terminate their child.

[Quackthulu2]

Lol, might be worth getting pregnant if that were the case.

[Agape93]

Lol I'll pay for the termination, "partner"

[Sixgunsound]

I don't think it's about the money for people willing to agitate and lobby for free.
When we're talking about paid and supplied rioters like 2020 that'd a different story.

[Lionman95]

No but I'd be OK to not have unprotected sex unless we both are ready for it. Because to me the problem isn't a financial one.

[shortster]

No, but could I get a tax write off for other types of murder? Like a bounty program for upper level cartel members or pedophiles?

[Agape93]

I'm good with that lol

[TallAnon]

I'm very pro-"not my problem", but this just sounds like you are inviting rich people to hire women for abortions.

[Agape93]

Lol didn't expect that idea actually xD

[Agape93]

Bezos would end up being paid after a while xD

[TallAnon]

Pretty much, lol

[DizzyDesii]

Nah i dont care about taxes

[Yucy_Gluttony]

OOOOOOO OH!!! OOH8-!!

[Agape93]

Lol you good?

[Yucy_Gluttony]

YES I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO THE OPINIONS

[Agape93]

Same lol I have another one tomorrow I know will piss someone off xD

[LazerBean]

Obviously not.

[Agape93]

Why not? We keep our rights, and we both get hefty tax breaks.

[LazerBean]

I didn't realize we were trying to revert back pre civil war and have the rights to pick which humans have the right to live. Perhaps we needs to enslave black people again while we are at it.

[Agape93]

Nobody has the right to use another person's body without permission. But I don't think you realize just how ironic your statement was, as people like you are literally trying to revert us back to a time we have less rights.

So how about 35%?

[LovingJo]

😲 😲

[Agape93]

Lol.

[Debbie14217]

uuuummmm nnnnoooo