The expectation is: no Hate toward anybody, why not include, Not hate racists?

[strateguy632]

we commonly here on many topics "stop the hate and no hate toward anybody" often hinting an implied false accusation that opposers of "whatever" not only opposed, but even feel hate. why does that not include "not hating racists" a term including anyone saying or writing something considered racism or offensive? do not be DEFIANT not angry at them, nothing more then calm debate, no hate to anybody including no hate toward racists?

[Soteris]

There is no debate to be had with Racists. Debate implies compromise and there is nothing to compromise with in regards to their positions and beliefs. Everything a racist believes in should be shunned and hated.

[Sasahara]

So if a racist belives the Roe V Wade verdict was bad, that belife should be shun ed and hated, since it would be a part of everything they belive?

[Soteris]

@Sasahara When I say a racists belief and positions should be shunned and hated I do not mean a specific person but what makes a person racist. Applying it to an individual example like you did is incorrect.

[Sasahara]

Sorry I took your comment the wroung way

[Soteris]

@Sasahara That is fine, I am pretty bad at making myself easily understood so I am more than used to misunderstandings.

[jshm2]

Because such statements are naïve platitudes.

You don't make wolves go away by giving them lambs. Rather you chase and then kill, before they do even more damage.

[msmissydc]

If there wouldn't be hate exept against racist there wouldn't be racists to hate on.

[FireGodGoesSeeknFire]

Most people really want to hate someone and racist provide an empathy free target. All inclusive compassion is extremely rare.

[OddBeMe]

It’s brave to put yourself out there, racist, but I still hate you.

[FunkyMonkee]

I'm not sure I understand the question.

[In_Trance]

it's all inclusive