On tape acknowledging classified docs and showing it to reporters. Our nations secrets…
12.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. OK. I say: I have a letter from your wife offering me a blow job, and I lift the corner of the envelope from my pocket. Did you see the document? If so, produce it so all can see it. Maybe she was only really offering to clean my drive way with a leaf blower. Words, sometimes even Trump's, can be cheap.
06 Reply- +1 y
- +1 y
Odd, your mental health and that of your fellow leftists has really deteriorated. No one on this thread mentioned your imaginary wife and the imaginary Paraguayan superpowers that you alleged she and other illegals have.
It's a good thing that your three firearms are merely imaginary, otherwise I'd be worried you'd find yourself facing a life sentence or capital punishment for murdering random people under the delusion that your imaginary wife was in danger of being raped.
I understand that as a eunuch and previous incel (I guess you kind of still are one), you don't realize that normal guys can get women who want to be with them voluntarily. I banged more women in Texas than you've talked to in your entire life. - +1 y
Then you need to get your hearing as well as your mental health examined. I know you're afraid of being removed from the homeless shelter where you currently stay and Medicaid might not cover everything, but you're going to be evicted anyway to make way for the more deserving illegals.
I do wonder how you came to be so racist. Oh, yeah, that's part of your mental illness comorbidity. - +1 y
I love how the last remaining defence is that "everyone knows Trump's a liar". How many times did he say "look"? Why would he say that if he wasn't showing them something?
“Well, with Milley – uh, let me see that, I’ll show you an example. He said that I wanted to attack Iran. Isn’t that amazing? I have a big pile of papers, this thing just came up. Look. This was him,” Trump says, according to the transcript. “They presented me this – this is off the record, but – they presented me this. This was him. This was the Defense Department and him. We looked at some. This was him. This wasn’t done by me, this was him.”
Trump continues: “All sorts of stuff – pages long, look. Wait a minute, let’s see here. I just found, isn’t that amazing? This totally wins my case, you know. Except it is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this.”
Most Helpful Opinions
Anonymous(36-45)+1 yThere doesn't seem to be much of anything he can do to turn the mindless drones against him. Normally I'd suggest he might have been lying because he lies endlessly, but the drones literally cannot seem to acknowledge a single of his many lies, so they can't start using the "just because he said it, it doesn't make it true" defense. He's not toast in the primary, but he's toast in the general election.
31 Reply- +1 y
And in court, where facts matter. I think this case is just about the fact he had documents he shouldn't have, and knew he shouldn't have had them. The fact that he shows them to people without security clearance or a need to know is a whole other crime in another state. If Judge "Loose" Cannon absolves him, she'll be in a world of hurt, and it won't do Trump any good.
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yBiden is the best president ever.
I would ask you if you agree, but you're a coward.
01 Reply
5.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. That particular crime was committed in New Jersey. I'm looking forward to nutcases saying "look at this" doesn't mean they looked at it. (The US military probably have a plan to invade the UK; it's their job to consider every possibility, and give it to POTUS if they ask for it.)
11 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
5Opinion
4.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. I have no doubt they are twisting his words or even editing audio. Don't trust CNN, they have even made him look more orange on TV and you don't think they're going to use deep fakes when they are able?
Also..
https://www.youtube.com/embed/yZc1gTYzEU0029 Reply- +1 y
lol.. okay, here:
https://youtu.be/2YrKliHex80 - +1 y
Whatabout... Whatabout... Whatabout...
The proof that what he was showing them was secret is Trump saying it was secret, that he could have declassified it when he was president but didn't. No-one says "look at this" if there isn't a "this" to look at. Not even Trump.
Oh, and there will also be sworn testimony from the people in the room (and unless every one of the tells the same lie, all the ones that do will be going to prison for perjury).
Smashing a phone with a hammer is the only way you can guarantee that people cannot access the data on that phone. Should she have left it intact and given it to a charity shop if there was any chance at all that it contained copies of confidential documents? And that's all they would have been, copies. Trump removed documents from the government and kept them illegally, defying a subpoena and intentionally obstructing justice. - +1 y
@goaded she was destroying evidence to protect her own ass oh my god dude xD Don't fall for DNC propaganda please.
Well if they can't bring anything up on him in court that's legitimate then this is bullshit and more proof that the Democrats are acting in bad faith. This is a fucking witch hunt and a sitting president going after his top rival is unacceptable. People love to say how the McCarthy era was bad, well.. - +1 y
By the way, it's typical of you to "have no doubt they are twisting his words or even editing audio" while you post a video that stops just before Biden said he was joking.
You accuse others of doing what you're doing. It's like all those Republicans who voted twice or for dead relatives, they thought they should do it because they'd been told that's what Democrats were doing. They weren't, it was a lie. - +1 y
@goaded some things you should not joke about. What if he was saying that to cover a slip up because he's demented and saying things he should not? Demented people let out secrets all the time. This is a legitimate concern and is not in bad faith, I am not going to give Biden the benefit of the doubt when he says he is joking. Fuck no I am not.
Hahaha 🤣 Yeah, and Biden was more popular with blacks than Obama was. Suuuure 😂 - +1 y
You just don't like that he was taking the piss out of Trump.
“I started off without you and I sold a lot of state secrets and a lot of very important things,” Biden said at the beginning of a technology roundtable he co-hosted with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He then added: “Now all kidding aside, look, we’re teaming up to design and develop new technology that’s going to transform the lives of people around the world.”
God, we've got another six months of idiots insisting that the obvious isn't true and Trump did nothing wrong, haven't we? Roll on the trials. - +1 y
What new wars during Trump's single term? I suppose having a madman in charge does discourage action, it works for Putin. Putin tried to take over a European country and deny that their society even existed in an attempt to eradicate its population, language, culture, and you think that was OK. Why?
- +1 y
"NATO was founded to oppose the Soviet Union"
Nope. NATO was founded to restrict the Soviet Union. It was never intended to invade or overcome the Soviets, it was to ensure that the Soviets didn't do something like Putin's doing to Ukraine to, say, Germany. It's a defensive alliance.
27.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Trump is not toast. After he wins the Nobel prize he will be nominated to take his place on Mt Rushmore.
04 Reply
+1 ySo the military was actively trying to incite a war with Iran and actively undermining the president’s opinion on the matter? That’s ok with you?
07 Reply- +1 y
Where they claim this is the president's plan when it wasn't?
- +1 y
Was this one of the docs they claimed to find?
- +1 y
Maybe he kept them in his garage or something.
Trump is still in and will be the Republican nomination to get Biden out of office. Although I thinkBiden will resign before is term is up. Too much bad info about him surfacing
03 Reply
Anonymous(30-35)+1 yhttps://www.youtube.com/embed/yZc1gTYzEU0The leftards who consider Trump toast should consider Biden toast too!
112 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 y@goaded A video were Biden admits to crimes before covering his ass by saying "just kidding"! No way the leftards who use that excuse to defend Biden would do the same to Republicans!
Opinion Owner+1 yIts not damning, II would have picked another video whit it if I knew a leftard was going to be spamming me about it, I just took the first I found. Still no way you guys would have used that line to defend a Republican!
- +1 y
It's called a discussion, not spamming, and posting an honest video would have not prompted a response.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxlKUl-z368
Opinion Owner+1 yMy video was honest. Go talk to the pink anon you never replied to for 3 days now, her last replie to you had some interesting facts you can discuss instead!
Opinion Owner+1 yThe pink anon who answered this question with "After hillary revealed US foreign policy to the entire world with her emails I don't think so" you never replied to her latest comment, go talk to her instead!
Opinion Owner+1 yIts here on this page, its an answer to the question for this fucking question you are spamming me on! Go spam her instead of me!
Opinion Owner+1 yat least stop spamming me! If you want to spam, spam her! No more replies to me here! Go answer other questions or something else!
Anonymous(18-24)+1 yAfter hillary revealed US foreign policy to the entire world with her emails I don't think so
014 Reply
Opinion Owner+1 y@goaded During her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton drew controversy by using a private email server for official public communications rather than using official State Department email accounts maintained on federal servers. After a years-long FBI investigation, it was determined that Clinton's server did not contain any information or emails that were clearly marked classified. Federal agencies did, however, retrospectively determine that 100 emails contained information that should have been deemed classified at the time they were sent, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails were retroactively designated confidential by the State Department
- +1 y
Yes, and what information was exposed by that? (She did it on the recommendation of the previous SoS, Colin Powell, by the way.) Trump literally takes the plans for invading Iraq out of a box, shows them to some random people with no security clearance who he knows are recording the conversation, and that's no big deal?
Opinion Owner+1 y@goaded I'm not arguing about apples and oranges. I'm talking about hillary clinton sending top secret classified information on a private email account in foreign countries as secretary of state, now we are all spying on other our allies as well as our enemies
- +1 y
Was that before or after she started drinking children's blood in a cabal in DC?
- +1 y
@DryGermanGuy It was right before she began having sex with the reptiles who went on to "groom"" small children.
Opinion Owner+1 y@goaded no she actually did worse. She exposed over 2000 classified top secret emails to us enemies and rivals.
Opinion Owner+1 y@msc545 it's not about a whataboutism game. The point is hillary did worse and no consequence so trump will be OK after the election is over.
- +1 y
We don't modify criminal sentences based on the trial or sentencing results of other prior potential cases. Hillary was never charged with anything, so if you think your little "legal" theory is going to get him off you are quite wrong.
Your crap is simple whataboutism at it's worst.
Opinion Owner+1 y@msc545 not whataboutism and you are missing the point. If a former president or high up politician goes to jail it sets a prescendent where other presidents like Bill clinton, George Bush and Obama could find themselves jailed. Trump is 77 years old, he's not exactly a picture of health. He will be dead within the next 5 years.
- +1 y
"She exposed over 2000 classified top secret emails to us enemies and rivals."
Your own quote says she didn't.
Firstly, having documents on your own server is not the same as "exposing" them. Secondly, there were not 2000 "top secret emails".
"Clinton's server did ***not*** contain any information or emails that were clearly marked classified."
"Federal agencies did, however, retrospectively determine that 100 emails contained information that ***should have been*** deemed classified at the time they were sent, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret"."
"2,093 emails were ***retroactively*** designated confidential by the State Department "
Trump had hundreds of paper documents that were very clearly marked, many as being Top Secret or higher. He refused to hand them back to the government when they asked, and even when they insisted via a subpoena. He hid them from and lied to his own lawyers so that they would pass on misinformation to the government. The documents weren't kept in a safe place, at one stage they were behind a curtain in a room used by guests to Mar a Lago.
Opinion Owner+1 y@goaded it actually is in terms of espionage. There's a reason she wasn't supposed to use her own email. Biden had taken secret top secret documents too and he wasn't even president then. Yet apperently it's OK because reasons...
+1 y100% done
10 Reply
Is Trump toast?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News