This is your political party, right wingers.

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News This is your political party, right wingers.

Pffttt you get your news from the Huffington Post? HAHAHAHAHAA No wonder you’re such a shitlib moron.
“In an excerpt from McKay Coppins’ upcoming “Romney: A Reckoning” published in The Atlantic, the author detailed how Republican lawmakers’ concerns about political backlash for opposing Trump morphed into a “more existential brand of cowardice” following the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.
Oooh! A “tell all” book written by a shitlib who hates Republicans and Trump... published by The Atlantic, a Shitlib Far-Left publication that—wait for it—hate Republicans and Trump. 🤦♂️
I’m sure they will be SOOOO un-biased.
“This is your party” LOL GTFO of here with that balogna! LOL
Wait wait 😂 Let’s look up the “author” of this new book you’re so excited about:
McKay Coppins (born February 2, 1987) is an American journalist and author who is a staff writer for The Atlantic. In 2012, Coppins was one of the "30 under 30" media pundits in Forbes magazine and also listed along with three other young BuzzFeed News journalists as one of Politico's "ten breakout reporters of 2012." He is a regular contributor to CNN and MSNBC.
😂 🤣
Totally unbiased. Totally.
🤦♂️ 😆
@Juxtapose you’re half right.
Seeing what they did on January 6th. they were not wrong.
Republicans are finished as a political party. they are just a cult/gang, of fear, now.
January 6 was a "mostly peaceful march" and no fires in contrast to... the ones i can't write.
@strateguy632 You want people to believe you're not allowed to say BLM? Bullshit.
There were 25,000,000 participants in BLM protests, 20,000 at Jan 6. Over 10,000 (less than 0.05%) indictments for their violent part in the protest, Over 1,000 (5%) for Jan 6.
In addition, Jan 6 was a last-ditch attempt to steal the presidency from the winner of the 2020 election, all legal and most illegal approaches having failed. BLM was an attempt to ensure justice.
LOL They didn’t beat any police officers to death. Only one person died that day. A woman shot in the neck by a police officer. I thought you did wnted cops to fire a warning shot? Or tackle them? Maybe shoot em in the leg? LoL what happened to all that? ROFL
@OddBeMe Dude the only people who believe in your manufactured psy-op are shitlibs. “Oooh they had zip ties!” Really? Who? Who had zip ties? I mean there were a few thousand people there. It’s pretty easy to just claim “ThEy HaD zIpTIeS!!!” to make it seem like they had some diabolical plan—I mean you’ve got to figure out SOMETHING to say when they all left their guns at home for the InSuRrEcTiOn! 👻 😆
@Agagagagaga you really are an idiot. At least Google before replying…
www.youtube.com/watch
@OddBeMe Yes. Because the police have never lied or planted anything on suspects before. Never ever.
🙃
Again, the whole thing is patently absurd. Can you name me one other violent insurrection that ever occurred in the world where every single rebel just conveniently FORGOT their gun at home?
And you think I’M the idiot? Do you really think a man in a headdress with face paint and dirty pants is gonna take down the Republic? Lol
@OddBeMe If you think the police don’t plant evidence or create stories then you reaaally need to grow up. Maybe you also believe in Santa. Fuck if I know but your delusions are hysterical. Hey I think someone took a shit on Pelosi’s desk, let me guess, he’s being investigated for crimes against humanity, right? 😂
@OddBeMe I would have said “yes” if the Biden’s didn’t suddenly gin up 50 insiders who worked in Intelligence who all told us that it was lstrwihht out of the Russian handbook.” LOL
Dude you would have been more believable if you only got 5 Intelligence officials. 😂
BUT FIFTY? 🤦♂️ 😆
See see! It can’t be true! Look at all these guys who are professional liars (and who literally orchestrated coups, drone strikes, and assassinations) who all say its RuSsIaN dIsInfOrmAtIoN 👻 They wouldn’t lie to you! Lol We just pay them to do that when they work for the CIA 😆
No, the pattern is that the whole thing is bullshit. You’re the one who for some stupid ads reason wants to believe what the CIA is telling you.
Dude even goat-herders in Pakistan don’t believe the CIA. LOL
@OddBeMe You want me to provide “proof” that the CIA and Intelligence communities are involved in psychological operations to undermine a nation’s political system?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
No, you didn’t “denounce” the BLM riots. Liberals WOULD NOT EVEN CALL IT A RIOT.
“PEACEFUL PROTESTS”
Oh and let’s not forget that book that they pushed to try to “explain” it all: “In Defense of Looting.” Yes. They are just “rising up” against inequality and capitalism... by mass looting stores and setting cars on fire.
So no, spare me with the “I and every Liberal” you know crap. It’s bullshit. We all know it’s bulllshit. You all called it “peaceful protests” again and again and again. I had curfews and riots in my own city. So fuck your lies. I saw the stores boarded up or with their windows smashed out. You didn’t condemn shit.
@Agagagagaga Yes I expect evidence before I even BEGIN to believe the CIA and Illuminati is responsible for anything. I would say with everything going on in the world, they’re asleep at the wheel.
AND Sorry, what did you say about Dems and BLM?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQ-n8i-Ea_Q
You expect evidence... yes and that’s why the sham January 6 Commission withheld THOUSANDS of hours of footage that they didn’t want people to see.
And next you’ll tell me that the capita police didn’t take Buffalo headress guy on a tour of the capital, escorting him around and opening doors for him.
Some violent insurrectionist! What a joke!
@Agagagagaga no the capitol security and police did a lot of inane strategies like perform mock “tours” to keep your ravaging Trumpites from VP and the Speaker.
Are you really sidestepping all the violence against cops by you fcks? Again, we lefties own up to it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iludfj6Pe7w
Opinion
13Opinion
People will say anything to sell books. Unfortunately you can’t believe everything you read…especially self proclaimed books about themselves or topics they were involved in. Just mentioning Trump or citing controversy will spike sales. Controversy sells…. wake up.
And if you think police’s bullying doesn’t happen everywhere, you are in fantasy land. The Democratic Party can’t get rid of Joe either….. a sadly laughable situation we are all in in the US. The massively wealthy (I. e. Blackrocks of the world) are the ones shaping the stories you and I read…. Keeping everyone up in ares, arguing amongst themselves…. distracted if you will.
It’s much easier to control the masses if they continue to argue amongst themselves / distracted from ridiculous / inconsequential topics (non-monetary).
Ah, yes, Romney (aka Pierre Delecto), that paragon of truth and reliability. Beyond being a "Never Trumper", he never saw a position he wouldn't flip-flop from.
Besides, don't you leftists hate private equity capitalists like Romney? Now he's the paragon of truth when he's useful to your Marxist cause.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is reaching newer and newer heights every day
@goaded: You're incorrectly assuming that a party label tightly locks someone into moving in lockstep. Even in European parliamentary politics, there are always backbenchers, and even Prime Ministers and Chancellors don't govern in accordance with the brand.
This is even more common in the US, where the real political divide is Establishment vs the People. And Romney s big-time establishment.
But rather than critically assessing claims, you desperately cling to anything that fits your propagandized, far-left worldview. In doing so, you go even further into negative numbers when it comes to credibility.
You're taking quotes from a book written by the guy who told us corporations are people. At this point you should ask yourself if you're the baddie.
Just because he's said some wrong things doesn't mean everything he says is wrong. Sensible people are more likely to trust something someone says if what they're saying is against their interests.
This is the same stupid reasoning that says the science of global warming is wrong because (other) scientists have been wrong before.
@Juxtapose and people going against a wider crowd they used to belonged to usually have some accurate critiques.
@Juxtapose And how do you know he can’t be trusted? Has he lied? Trump has been caught in a thousand lies. Obama has been caught in a few. I would believe Obama over Trump.
It's the guy straight up telling you that corporations are people.. I shouldn't have to show you a link but here you go..
www.usnews.com/.../mitt-romneys-lies
@Juxtapose yes, I can. There's no amount of leftist propaganda that they won't parrot and believe wholeheartedly. It's what years of government schooling and mass media indoctrination will do to you.
@Juxtapose along with the jan 6 "insurrection".
That's why there will be 10,000,000 more illegal immigrants in our country during the 4 years of biden's regime?
That's why they decriminalized shoplifting, and now organized gangs raid stores in California continually?
Cuz it’s not for Dems
apnews.com/article/fact-checking-160551360299
it's all 100% true, lol. Your gaslighting doesn't chang facts. Did San Fran make shoplifting less than $950 a misdemeanor or not?
Did Michael Brown say "hands up, don't shoot"?
According to Alex Bastian, special advisor to Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón who co-authored Prop 47, most shoplifting was already prosecuted as a misdemeanor anyway.
“What Prop 47 did is increase the dollar amount by which theft can be prosecuted as a felony from $400 to $950 to adjust for inflation and cost of living,” Bastian said.
So yes, it did. That's the problem with your "fact checking" you deny what they literally say
@gorydetails no they just put…how do you say…accurately. It’s still prosecuted. What difference would it make as felony? Especially those brazen swarm shoplifters. That’s conspiracy and definitely more than $950 taken.
apnews.com/article/fact-checking-160551360299
Did they make the limit $950 for where shoplifting is still a misdemeanor? Yes or no? Because that's what I stated they did.
We're talking about it because you made the asinine statement that democrats are for law and order. And I, once again, had to prove you're full of shit.
He's literally on camera bragging about withholding a loan unless a prosecutor who was investigating the company his shit-stain son was on the board of for corruption was fired.
You're going off script, you support ukraine, it's not the most corrupt country in that past of the world, remember?
We've established that democrats create fake narratives already, so I'm not surprised you see him as corrupt. Biden told you he was.
Biden…aka the White House…threatened Putin’s puppet Poroshenko that his corrupt prosecutor had to go or no foreign aid. Which every president has done time immemorial.
www.factcheck.org/.../
And it's hilarious how you say Biden is not corrupt.
oversight.house.gov/.../
@Juxtapose Well, that was a really great way to derail the conversation with nonsense.
"You don't know the first thing about [Trump] besides what CNN and MSNBC spoon feeds you."
I don't watch either, and most of the information I get about Trump is in the form of court filings, indictments recommended by grand juries of citizens.
Wow, that oversight.house.gov/.../ link is a impressive example of misinformation. They're obviously counting on people being too lazy to check for themselves.
1. Archer said Hunter Biden enriched himself by selling the Biden "brand", they're pretending that the money was going to "the family" or Joe. That's simply not in what was said.
2. The testimony was that the phone calls in the presence of business partners were smalltalk, it's not "Democrats would have Americans believe", it's what the evidence shows.
etc.
You can read the actual transcript of the interview here: oversight.house.gov/.../...n-Archer-Transcript.pdf
@goaded hahaha wow you really believe it was small talk?
I don't know man that seems like a bad faith argument to me. I don't think you really believe that Hunter would put his father on speaker 20 times just for small talk in the middle of a meeting. That's suspect and you don't have to be a genius to figure out why.
@Juxtapose Dude, my dad hops on my business calls all the time to shoot the shit about the weather and the Giants.
Not only do you not have to be a genius, you can read the testimony from the person who was there. oversight.house.gov/.../...n-Archer-Transcript.pdf It's on page 39, at the bottom:
"And so in certain circumstances, when you're in -- you know, if his dad calls him at
dinner and he picks up the phone, then there's a conversation. And the, you know, the
conversation is generally about the weather and, you know, what it's like in Norway or
Paris or wherever he may be. But that was -- yeah, that happened."
As to @gorydetails' moronic message, he was never on "a business call", he was making a phone call which happened during business meetings. I don't expect gory's dad wants to call him every day, either.
@gorydetails and if I ran a city and downgraded shoplifting of $950 to a misdeamor I would imagine that’s to stop housing and feeding people in jail for a year. Instead have them do community service.
Then when there’s “swarm burglary” there’s additional charges to make it 10x the felony.
And how do you know Cali isn’t investigating misdemeanors? Actually shoplifting at major stores is high on cop’s list nation wide as they’re job employers and have pull.
@gorydetails At what point did I ever say Hunter Biden was a good person? He's traded on his father's name most of his life and cons people out of a lot of money. That still has nothing to do with the president, and Hunter has never been in government.
Tell you what, just don't vote for Hunter Biden.
@gorydetails yep, Joe Biden has never voted correctly on pretty much anything and even Obama told people not to underestimate his ability to fuck up.
The fact that these two "progressives" are cheering on corruption while knowingly turning a blind eye to it for the sake of political expedience is disgusting. Just because someone in a position of authority put out a transcript doesn't mean anything, and frankly those transcripts are not convincing. You don't call during business meetings and get put on speaker, especially when you hold such a high office. They are 100% dealing in dirty dealings.
@Juxtapose They 100% have dirty dealings? What’s the proof of that? Just a few quick links please…
@Juxtapose let's not forget they're now the warmongers and shills for billionaire pharma companies and who are the "establishment"
Did you see Zelensky at the UN? Could you imagine Churchill leaving England while it was being bombed to shit to go lecture the world about the weather? What a bunch of fucking clowns.
BAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA Holy shit... I've never seen anyone this incredibly stupid. No wonder you're easy to brainwash with propaganda.
"The fact that these two "progressives" are cheering on corruption while knowingly turning a blind eye to it..."
Except we're not. It's just a pack of lies to distract from Trump's genuine legal woes. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE of Joe Biden being corrupt, Hunter Biden was NEVER IN GOVERNMENT, and Republicans in Congress are simply lying about what their "star" witness told them because they know there's nothing there.
It's all projection with you idiots.
@gorydetails They're still hunting and indicting Jan 6 rioters. Compiling comprehensive criminal cases takes time, especially if they're going to stick against an ex-president and there almost too many crimes to count. Ironically, Trump sped up the process by declaring his run for office, Garland was extremely timid, the Special Counsel isn't.
Then there's the documents case, which only really started when the FBI found all the documents Trump stole, just a year or so ago.
@goaded wait the indictment that was printed on the GA county website before the grand jury voted? That one? The one where the one grand juror foreperson said she wanted to subpoena trump so she could meet him?
People who advocate for millions of illegal immigrants to pour into a country unfettered, allow cities to be burned in bullshit riots, and decriminalize shoplifting don't get to lecture anyone about the rule of law.
As I said, you're a bunch of clowns and will be treated as such.
*her.
@gorydetails Of course nobody in the history of the world has accidentally posted something online. Trump is facing 91 counts in court, many of his former lawyers have been disbarred for supporting his lies. The indictments have all passed through one or more citizen juries, passed muster with multiple judges, and Trump's lawyers aren't even claiming there's no case to answer. Because there is.
@Juxtapose part of me kinda thinks they’re like the flat earthers and are just trolling. Because no one can be that stupid.
@OddBeMe see, that’s the thing. You and your nazi friend are clowns. You’re not to be taken seriously. At no point does anything you say approach rational thought. So you will continue to be mocked for the fools you are.
Because if you even knew what the term “logic” meant, you’d be able to follow this little ditty. IF the crackhead son of a vice president was on the board of directors of an energy company, AND a prosecutor was investigating corruption in that energy company, AND that same vice president withhold loans to the country in which they all operate unless the prosecutor was fired, THEN we can conclude that the firing of the prosecutor was beneficial to the vice president’s son’s income.
@Juxtapose The projection is strong in you. You'll disbelieve court documents because a serial liar tells you to.
@goaded you are putting words into his mouth and that is reprehensible. He was defending free speech in regards to the Holocaust and yes, it should be 100% legal to deny the Holocaust all day long.
The Holocaust did happen and you have to be really stupid to deny it but people have the right to be stupid.
You are right, just not the way you think you are.
Letting Holocaust deniers do their business unmolested shows your integrity and the strength of your argument. Trying to shut them down on the other hand betrays your weakness and lack of conviction.
If a pedophile wants to agree with me that the sky is blue then they can have at it dude, I don't give a fuck 🤷
@Juxtapose For God's sake, man, there's a difference between "unmolested" and "uncorrected". Have you never heard of "the Best Answer to Unwanted Speech Is More Speech"?
His speech was that Holocaust denial is neither evil nor immoral, mine is that it is both.
I'll remind you that he had the gall to call us Nazis, and he's also the character you called to assist you in this conversation. Consider what that says about your integrity and the strength of your arguments.
The problem is that you two spout endless amounts of bullshit and don't accept facts.
I just looked up Daryl Davis. Clearly, it worked because he was talking to ignorant but rational people. Do you really think speaking reasonably with Joel would cause him to stop acting like he does? Trust me, I've tried it. I'm all but certain he knows what he's doing, and he does it anyway.
@Juxtapose See what I mean? Nothing but insults and projection.
@gorydetails So, have you changed your mind about whether Holocaust denial is evil or immoral?
@gorydetails You're only here for the chance to throw insults. If you're going to call me a Nazi, I'm going to bring up the fact that you think there's nothing immoral or evil about Holocaust denial. You can always retract that statement and say you were wrong, or that you were just trying to be edgy. I'd never mention it again.
@goaded lmao. You can do whatever you want. But let's remember you wanted to exclude people from society because they were 'unclean'. Not me. Let's remember that you were fine with putting people in quarantine camps because you were scared of a cold. Every bit of jack-booted authoritarianism you were right in line with. So shut the fuck up with your fake moral outrage.
@Juxtapose See? A constant stream of lies and insults to divert from anything he finds uncomfortable, and you invited him in because you like it. What does that say about your integrity?
@gorydetails "Where was the lie?"
I said "lies and and insults to divert...". We were discussing your tendency to call me a Nazi when you think there's nothing immoral or evil about Holocaust denial, remember? Then you told me to "shut the fuck up with your fake moral outrage".
The lies included: "you were fine with putting people in quarantine camps because you were scared of a cold. Every bit of jack-booted authoritarianism you were right in line with." (colds don't kill millions of people around the world, there were no quarantine camps in the US, and Australia's death toll was a quarter that of the US, saving around 66,000 lives.)
Now you pretend "to exclude people who refused the covid shot from public" is the same as "putting people in quarantine camps [and] jack-booted authoritarianism".
@Juxtapose "saying that he is less reasonable than a Ku Klux Klan member is [] pretty absurd."
Not really. The ones who left the KKK were reasonable. They realised their hate was based on lies and nonsense. @gorydetails (@joeldalton) isn't going to change.
@Juxtapose and notice he's trying to distract from the fact he WAS ok with excluding people who didn't get the leaky covid shots from public.
@Juxtapose yup. They are all trying to gaslight how horrific they were. They thought it was fine to put a toddler in a mask and arrest a guy paddleboarding on his own in the ocean. The increase in substance abuse, suicides, lost incomes, domestic abuse, depression, etc is all ignored like it never happened.
@gorydetails it doesn't even occur to them that the cost of these lockdowns are actually greater than letting the virus run its course. These lockdowns and other measures have virtually no evidence to support them and I constantly post proof. I'll post some more proof of a doctor speaking about this:
https://youtu.be/ZIk7lbSJz9o?si=4Cie6RU_6EBvOTLQ
And then I have some more!
https://youtu.be/RaLxhFiOBYk?si=GVUYViId6Uhea-Wj
@Juxtapose that and the facts that lockdowns did not save lives, and masks have no scientific proof that they work.
@gorydetails yeah they didn't even run the proper studies on masking before putting all these edicts out and the methodology for the vaccines is so gross that numerous people in the FDA have resigned over this. It's a giveaway to big pharma and you would think liberals will be all four sticking it to corporations who are ruining the world.
@Juxtapose especially if you consider big pharma's likely in the top 3 of most corrupt industries in the world.
" @goaded yeah, it is jack booted authoritarianism and was wildly unconstitutional. "
Have you never heard of public health emergencies? If the US had done as well as Australia (which was never going to happen, but anyway...) fewer than 300,000 Americans would have died in the pandemic. That "cold" has killed more than one in every 250 people in 16 states, twice the death toll of Germany.
And, of course, now the guy who says there's nothing evil or immoral about Holocast denial and the guy who invited him to the party are tag-teaming their lies and distractions in order to Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender.
Senators were afraid of what Trump supporters would do to them or their families.
None of this was about covid or Nazis until you two brought it up.
@Juxtapose @gorydetails Just double-down, why don't you?
You both know you haven't a leg to stand on.
@Juxtapose let's bet on whether he's getting the latest booster... we already know he's one of those who still wears a mask,
@gorydetails @Juxtapose Sorry gents…but I thought this covid conspiracy shit was over.
Did over a million Americans die from Covid? (Probably more in Europe, @goaded to tell us)
And the lockdowns and mask mandates could have been unconst. But there’s no court decision. So it is literally NOT unconstitutional.
@OddBeMe we don't know. Because we know that the stats are made up because there was a financial incentive to do so. We also know if you had a heart attack and had covid that was called a covid death. You'd think you'd understand this by now being someone who pretends he's smart.
Let me guess, you'll be lining up for the new booster, too.
Again: of course, now the guy who says there's nothing evil or immoral about Holocast denial and the guy who invited him to the party are tag-teaming their lies and distractions in order to Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender.
Senators were afraid of what Trump supporters would do to them or their families. Unsurprisingly, since the supporters happily believed the lies you keep passing on.
None of this was about covid or Nazis until you two brought it up.
@Juxtapose You talked to medical people? How many? Those out back for a smoke? You think that stacks up against scientific data.
Liberal Jux! If you’re in there come out!
You admitted you didn’t give a fuck if an entire generation of children suffered negative academic, mental, and social consequences due to lockdowns. So spare me your fake moral outrage,, you piece of shit.
They were absolutely not necessary.
@gorydetails www.factcheck.org/.../
@gorydetails "Neguse asks Clay Higgins if he thinks COVID is dangerous. Higgins says “I would put a virus along the lines of the flu far down my list of priorities that I would consider dangerous.” Neguse introduces an article titled “Clay Higgins: Covid almost killed me” pic. twitter. com/6kpAazq3lv"
@gorydetails Here's the "healthy American" anti-mask, anti-vaxx, CCP "biological warfare", "natural immunity" Republican admitting that flu-like covid "nearly killed" him one of the two times he caught it. But it's totally not dangerous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Cd1HWfZJjs
You're not what he does in his free time, are you?
Yeah these books like the book written by one of Trump's accusers that also claims that everyone raped her.
The evidence was flimsy coming from a woman trying to sell her book and said book listed a long list of tall tales. No times or dates. Perfectly honest I can't imagine any guy ever assaulting the woman in the Trump case, Trump a guy who be banging pornstars, models, playboy bunnies, cheerleaders, beauty contest contestants etc and he's apparently raping some 40 year old liberal journalist in a clothes store? Doesn't seem likely.
Hunter has also admitted guilt, as a means of getting the rest of the charges dropped.
@drewtate
If you want to be honest here, she didn’t actually sue Trump for rape. 🤷♀️
@RainbowMarinade yeah sued for defamation because he said he didn't rape her. Only in America can you accuse someone of rape in a book with no evidence a long with 20 other guys and no conviction or admission of guilt and then sue them when they deny this is true and then take them to court again for protesting their innocence.
@drewtate
Lmao. Gotta love the civil justice system. 🤷♀️
Trump has used it to fuck over many people over the years, so you’ll excuse me if I don’t have much sympathy for him here, fair or unfair.
I was only pointing out that she didn’t sue him for rape like you said.
@drewtate
I didn’t say I supported it. Why do you think i find Trump so detestable? He’s used the civil law system to bankrupt people. Many people. She’s playing Trump’s own game against him.
Why is it suddenly an issue when he’s on the losing end?
@drewtate
I’m not sure I follow. It’s an issue because the rich guy who has used the system against others is on the other end of the stick?
But it wasn’t an issue when the rich guy was using that very same system to bankrupt everyday, hard working Americans.
Square that circle for me. 🤔
@drewtate
Just answer my one question.
Why is it not an issue for you that Trump used civil law to bankrupt hard working Americans?
@drewtate
“.. you mean business?”
Okay, so you don’t know what I’m talking about. That’s fine. I don’t find many Trump supporters who do.
Just know that Trump has used this very same system, and taken advantage of all the ins and outs, to bankrupt people along the way. The fact that that very same system is working against him now? Meh 🤷♀️
And you can stop with the outraged cries of “it can happen to you.” Trump is not an example of it can happen to you.
The people he stole from, however. They are perfect examples of “it could happen to you.”
@drewtate
LMAO.
Stay ignorant ✊
Mitt Romney is jealous that Trump won and he lost. He will say anything to discredit him. He is not running for re-election because he knows that he will be "Cheneyed".
Oh, they know. They want their politicians to respond to threats of violence, since that's all they understand.
I don't think it Trump was ever acquitted of anything.
Also, Mitt Romney is a snake. I don't believe him in the slightest.
acquited? when did senate do that? what year?
How is politicians fearing repercussions from the voter base inherently a bad thing? I think the system would run a lot better for the masses if they were all taught to fear the masses
You are really trusting what Romney has to say? You are looking at the hard hitting sources all right.
The utter lawlessness in the cities that democrats run. BLM burn down buildings and the only people that the media wants charged are the people who tried to stop them. This still rings true today with Daniel Penny (AOC cheered for his prosecution by the way) and many stores are seeking to close down their branches in cities like San Francisco and Chicago because they kept getting robbed and the police doesn't do anything about it. I don't remember what came of it but NYC tried to crack down on wood stoves used to make their specialized pizza for climate reasons and I cannot imagine that would go well even for the citizens of that city.
>Your side wants to hang illegals
Who said that? We just want security to actually exist on the border, that's it. Apparently that was such a difficult task for the US government that they didn't bother to close it even during covid when you'd think such measures would take place. I guess covid wasn't that serious huh?
>go back to the gold standard
Ironically it was a republican who took us off that standard and decided to tie it to oil. The only reason I can think of is to use as an excuse to go to war in the Middle East. We should have gone back a long time ago, or never went off in the first place, because now BRICS has launched their gold-backed currency and now our economy is fucked. Give it time and we will really feel the pain of that.
>make divorce illegal
What? Are you talking about removing no-fault divorce (that was, again, ironically introduced by a republican)? If so, then that is not even close to being the same thing. With no fault divorce, the state essentially profits under broken marriages using alimony and child support. What is even the point in a marriage if your spouse can just leave you just by simply waking up one day and suddenly didn't love you anymore? You are better off just being in a relationship.
Funny that Bible Belt cities have the same crime rates as Chicago. And majority of overall crime is the south
worldpopulationreview.com/.../crime-rate-by-state
bahahahahah you fall for this shit every time, don’t you.
I'm not even a little bit surprised.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions