How is blackfacing wrong but replacing white characters with black actors right?

[genericname85]

just wondering. cause essentially, it's both racist.

[BuckCannon]

Neither of those are racist, unless you're a woke libtard.

Joy Behar and Justin Trudeau are the most liberal scums on Earth, but they both did the blackface thing. They will lie to your face and deny it, but they're full of shit.

But changing characters in the way you suggest, is simply done by cowardice wimps.

Batman is white... end of story.

[genericname85]

if chosing the employee for an acting role according to their race isn't racism, I don't know what is.

[BuckCannon]

I just told you that the biggest libtards on the planet did the backface thing. It's only racist if a conservative does it.

[genericname85]

which is ironic, cause the KKK was founded by the democrats and slavery was defended by the democrats xD

[BuckCannon]

Yes, of course. But they want you to forget that. Ask about that in your next question. They will tell you that back then, conservatives were the slave owners. They do that to trip you up. Democrats were the slave owners, and they know it.

[genericname85]

actually i did ask that question believe it or not. one person said something along the lines of "at historical event xy, the democrat/republican ideology flipped, so it's todays republicans who were democrats then". something so insanely dumb i don't even recall their argument completely.

[BuckCannon]

I'm glad that you're too smart to fall for that shit.

I keep a list of future questions. I'm adding this one to my list...(feel free to ask it if you wish)

"Had the civil war never happened; would Democrats still own slaves?"

That will rile up the Dems.

My next question is locked and loaded, and will be asked in a few hours...

It basically is..."Is it OK to just like women with vaginas?"''

I don't even think the libs will touch that one. lol

[genericname85]

you should also ask if christians are still fine with slavery cause the bible promotes it xD

[BuckCannon]

You should ask it right now!

[Chayce]

Dude what. Blackface originally was done nitpicking black stereotypes. How could that not be deemed racist or offensive

[Chayce]

“if chosing the employee for an acting role according to their race isn't racism, I don't know what is.”

It wasn’t until the 80s-90’s that minorities were getting really big name roles in movies, tv shows and even commercials. It was literally all white people prior.

[genericname85]

@Chayce both of us agreed that it IS racist. what are you on about?

"It wasn’t until the 80s-90’s that minorities were getting really big name roles in movies, tv shows and even commercials. It was literally all white people prior." yes and today more and more white people are intentionally excluded from such roles.

[Drewtate]

I only ever have seen white Liberals in blackface.

Replacing white characters is studio's trying to gain a bigger market. They did the same with budlight. They keep hiring these women People and never learn.

[Anonymous]

Its not. Neither are actually racist, but sjws will ree about the first one. They are hypocrites

Also take notice that people who defend this as an argument

Will not do the same if you make the same argument about "blackface"

[Likes2drive]

Yeah I never understood that either, seems racist either way but they do it a lot replacing white characters with black but not the other way around