Do you know the story of china occupying tibet? which year?

[strateguy632]

my opinion we don't hear any big FUSS "end occupation of tibet" nor complaints that u. n. cancelled "republic of china" because that occupation doesn't serve to camouflage jew hatred. "occupation" isn't something that people actually oppose.

only the false accusation of "jew occupy territory" is useful for camoflage to call their feelings of hate toward jews "anti-occupation".

the opposite of the fuss we hear: we must not corrupt history: israel got land from JORDAN in a defensive war same as france, jew not less rights, than france, in contrast to the true crime of occupy tibet, by p. r. c. china. o emphasize not a defense war just steal , in contrast to innovent israel. china evil occupation continues but only i make a fuss because that occupation deserves protest.

even the area of china, in books, must be fixed not to include occupied tibet. i don't recognize that occupation.

i oppose that occupation by china and also protest u. n. canceling the existence of republic of china, when "people republic china" stole from both.

[genericname85]

i don't know the exact year but it has been a thing for quite some time. i guess we hear nothing about it in the media, cause for our government, that has no strategical relevance. so no propaganda to legitimate war to "help" tibet.

[strateguy632]

try to contrast all the "end occupation rallies" and news companies making a fuss about occupation pretending they oppose "occupation" , but only the valid one, not the evil occupation by china.

[genericname85]

there's a bunch of occupatins going on in the world. media only cares about the ones that are of strategic relevance to the country. because don't have to craft a narrative to "help a nation" that they wanna invade anyway.

[genericname85]

they don't wanna invade anyway.

[strateguy632]

about media they all "pretend virtue" should make a fuss.
news companies are not controlled by the state department, only if strategic, are they?

[genericname85]

the state can override the freedom of press, if they can make it a matter of homeland security.

[genericname85]

and when it's about which countries you wanna support militarily, that's a matter of homeland security. media is a means of propaganda and psy ops.