my opinion we don't hear any big FUSS "end occupation of tibet" nor complaints that u. n. cancelled "republic of china" because that occupation doesn't serve to camouflage jew hatred. "occupation" isn't something that people actually oppose.
only the false accusation of "jew occupy territory" is useful for camoflage to call their feelings of hate toward jews "anti-occupation".
the opposite of the fuss we hear: we must not corrupt history: israel got land from JORDAN in a defensive war same as france, jew not less rights, than france, in contrast to the true crime of occupy tibet, by p. r. c. china. o emphasize not a defense war just steal , in contrast to innovent israel. china evil occupation continues but only i make a fuss because that occupation deserves protest.
even the area of china, in books, must be fixed not to include occupied tibet. i don't recognize that occupation.
i oppose that occupation by china and also protest u. n. canceling the existence of republic of china, when "people republic china" stole from both.
Most Helpful Opinions