Go ahead, I'm curious to see what you think.
Because it's not their fucking problem.
Think about it. Gaza is right next door to Egypt. Egypt has a lot of Muslims, if Gazans want a "two state solution" you might think that Egypt could annex Gaza, Egypt could take over government functions and everybody could chill the fuck out.
But why would they do that? What's gonna happen if there's STILL a residual Hamas supporting sentiment, and they continue to attack Israel? Now Egypt is harboring terrorists. Is Egypt gonna take responsibility for policing Gaza? What's the president of Egypt gonna say if that were to happen? Sorry bro, we policed them as best we could but you know how they are? We completely denounce our citizens and they don't represent the Egyptian people?
The simple answer is that everybody that is an established state has their shit sorted out, and nobody wants get involved in a dicey situation when there's literally ZERO upside. The legitimate governments of the Arab world have actual practical responsibilities to their constituents and pie in the sky dreams of a renaissance complete with a Caliphate isn't something that's gonna get them reelected, or help them maintain their power base.
Most Helpful Opinions
I can only talk about my time in Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, UAE and another country, but the locals always said Palestinians are filthy dogs that do... sexually deviant things that involve feces. Not just the typical Iranians hate Iraqs and will tell you in no uncertain terms. Mentioning Palestinians usually made them spit. I never got a good answer why. It was "yay they kill jews" and everything but the one Palestinian that I worked with... they wouldn't even shake his hand. It was something to see, truly.
They tried to in the past.
Assassinations, coup attempts, suicide bombers - Hamas and other terrorist militias within the civilian population just can't not attack. Even countries which try to ally with them.
Last time Egypt let in refugees from Gaza, their King was assassinated.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
14Opinion
because they don't want to weaken the claim to the land by allowing people to leave. it's a fairly callous political decision giving priority to the stakes of abandoning the land over the safety of human people
so essentially they aren't accepting refugees because if they abandon the land they may lose the claim to it
Because they are feral savages. Even Jordan and Egypt where they originated don't want them. Just like the criminal aliens invading out southern border.
Because only white countries should get refugees, let's not avoid the subject.
Countries that share ideology with the Palestinians will not accept refugees, but it is expected of Europe who does not share common culture/community/religion to take them in.
Look at what they did when Lebanon and Jordan hosted them in decades past. They also supported Saddam Hussein in the first Gulf War, which got them kicked out of the Gulf countries.
Hypocrisy at a guess. They're usually fast enough to complain when Western Europe doesn't want to take them in and brand them as "oppressors" but won't accept Muslim refugees themselves.
Good question, either they know a population raised on propaganda to hate is dangerous, or they want that population to remain and fight.
Because the world economy is in big trouble and these people are infested with terrorists and on the anti-america side of a global conflict involving China.
The same reason Christian countries (50+) will not accept American immigrants.
No one can stand them, but will allow them if they have a case.
Because they bring a lot of baggage which creates problems in the host country as previously seen in Jordan and Lebanon. With no right of return, there’s also no chance for them to ever go back.
Because they’re problem starters.
because they don't speak arabic?
Only God knows 💔💔💔❤️🩹😥
Are there 50+ Islamic run countries?
Nobody wants them
Because they belong to their country...
Learn more