Is this grooming?

[OddBeMe]

Yes

No

A total of 30 votes were cast: 8 girls and 22 guys. See detailed results

[Drewtate]

No, just weird. At least they are practicing trigger discipline unlike Alec Balwin despite his 40 years of handling firearms.

[OddBeMe]

Very interesting family photos you have.

[Drewtate]

So. e are hilarious

[OddBeMe]

Is the last one real?

[Drewtate]

Looks almost photocopied but there is weird pics like that out there

[OddBeMe]

Sure but I guess compared to what gun fetishists do theirs are real. Lol

[OddBeMe]

And to defend Alec Baldwin, I worked on sets and he was handed a “cold gun” and ordered to shoot at the camera for the shot.

[Drewtate]

I was at the book depository, Lee Harvey oswald was shooting at a gunman behind the grassyknowl

[OddBeMe]

You know you’re right. Alec totally wanted to murder that DP chick. Stupid me…

[Drewtate]

There is a video of Alec Baldwin on SNL claiming he could gun anyone down in Broad daylight and escape justice

[OddBeMe]

Funny. If trump actually did it you’d blame the victim for being in the way of the bullet

[Juxtapose]

So parenting is called "grooming" now?

What do you call it when a a parent raises their kid to be a democrat? Or how about a christian? Or how about a muslim? Or have a feminist? Is that grooming too?

[OddBeMe]

Apparently trans story time is grooming, so I imagine that word is meaningless.

[Sasahara]

@Juxtapose If you read other answers here you will see a person considering the photo near pornographic, and asker liked that answer.

[Juxtapose]

"Trans story time" haha yeah when sex offenders read to kids about inappropriate material they should not even know about? Yeah, that's grooming. John Money and founders of trans ideology are straight up pedophiles who molested kids in their experiments. "Fuckology" LOL GTFO with that "science". Especially if you are going to try to make infants orgasm. Fuck off with your false equivalency.

[Juxtapose]

@Sasahara it's because he is brainwashed to surrender to tyrants.

[Juxtapose]

"Quote from John William Money:

If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties,

if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way."

That's one of the founding members of gender ideology. I can show you Alfred Kinsey and how fucked he is too.

"But the native Americans had some two spirit thing bro so trans people have been around forever."

Were they cutting off healthy body parts at the rate they are now? No? Thought so.

[Sasahara]

@Juxtapose Isn’t it fascinating how words lose their meaning or becomes dog wistles when SJWs don’t like how they are used?
Grooming apparently meaningless now, woke is meaningless… Yet people who find the word woke meaningless have no problems with leftists using that meaningless word.

Also, notice how can act like all priests are pedos, but making similar comments about trannies, now thats going to far, despite their pretence to want equality.

And unless there have been trans story times I have not heard about, his comment to you makes little sense, all complainst I have heard regarding story times, were about drag story times. And as far as I have had it hammered in by SJWs, drag queens are like traps, just not feminine. They know they are men, and unlike trannies identify as their real gender. One would think a leftist like Odd would know the difference. Not that he is the only SJW I have seen make that mistake. For all the importance they put on peoples gender and pronouns, SJWs sure have no qualm about turning otonokos into trannies when translating Japanese media. (Otonoko is the Japanese term for traps /feminine guys. Think the reverse of a tomboy)

[OddBeMe]

@Sasahara I find it funny when you fcks just assume convictions or elections are corrupt just because you don’t agree with it.

[Sasahara]

@OddBeMe Since you do read here, why not confirm why you liked a post claiming the photo you posted is near pornography? Do you perhaps agree with it? If so, why the heck posting it?

[purplepoppy]

Wonder which one of them will grow up to shoot up a school?

[OddBeMe]

Or the wife.

[jshm2]

It's retardation of the near second order. But none are holding the weapons primed, so it's probably just a photo taken to appeal to the gun totting masses.

[Redstang88]

It’s irresponsible. I grew up around guns, but above all else was taught they aren’t toys

[OddBeMe]

Agreed. I wish we would stop fetishizing guns and treat them like nail guns or hammers.

[Sevenpointfive]

that's a little too young to get your 7 underage children guns for x-mas. this is grooming. but they look like responsible gun-toting people

[Sasahara]

No its not.
@OddBeMe You liked a comment stating your image is near pornographic. Why are you posting images including children you consider near pornographic?

[Texaskid1]

I believe n the 2nd amendment.

That being said I don't think underage people should be handling guns.

and , yes , the pic, is... odd.

[Hispanic-Cool-Guy]

Not sure but that family picture is extremely weird.

[Static_In_The_Attic]

It’s not grooming it’s your average family photo nowadays.

[Jerre]

Hard to believe kids at an early age holding guns

[OddBeMe]

It’s the kids nonchalance. You can tell every family picture is this gun fetish.

[Jerre]

@OddBeMe Thank you for the Like

[OddBeMe]

Of course.

[Anonymous]

Very American.

[msc545]

That picture is damn near pornography