Do you think they should televise Trump's federal trials?

[Anonymous]

I think they should record them, maybe C-SPAN should do it, but not allow transmission until after the verdict, or even wait for sentencing, if guilty. Normal reporting would be allowed as usual.

It's a trial, not a campaign rally, but it will be instructive for historians.

[strateguy632]

the saying no such thing as bad publicity. when people see how they misuse court to nit-pick political rivals... so much NOW near election he will seem like the underdog martyr whether he is innocent or the judge is biassed.

what do we call politicians who arrest opponents near elections?

[Asker]

No politician arrested Trump, the DoJ (via a special counsel, like Durham) did (twice), the Georgia DA did, the NYC DA did (and got a guilty verdict).

[Dargil]

I wouldn't watch them. I wouldn't watch the upcoming impeachments either.

[Anonymous]

No. There’s no reason to try the cases by exception.

[KhunMike]

Absolutely! Why do you think the feds didn't release the Jan 6th tapes until they were sued?

Insurrection my ass.

[Asker]

Do you watch months of gas station video to disprove the five minutes of robbery video? How does that work?

[KhunMike]

That's the lamest thing you could come up with? lol
Why would you not release the months of the gas station video?

This site is boring me to death. It's just full of anon morons who are probably not even American.

[Asker]

No, it's why it makes no sense to look at scenes without violence to "disprove" the scenes with violence. "Oh, but he only shot the victim for less than a second in the entire month!"

[KhunMike]

No wonder you're anon.