Guys, Is it still a Satanic or naughty hand gesture if a Democrat does it?

[OldBlue]

------------------------------------------------------------- start here :24 ------------------------------------------

(If a concerned parent at a school board meeting questions the school curriculum, the corrupt justice department lists them as domestic terrorist. If a pro-Palestinian protest group tells the governor of California that he can't have his annual tree lighting ceremony outdoors... Gavi folds like a cheap suit.)

[sawno]

Yes, the question would be if its always intended as a satanic one or if it can also he comfortable but I have seen politicians do different ones to both democrats and republicans.

[OldBlue]

It's a classic case of making something out of nothing.

[sawno]

I don't agree with that, they show their allegiance since satanists believe you have to show it. Its both a virtue signal and a warning sign so it is considered consent.

I have seen politicians do specific hand gestures as they walk on stage that aren't somewhat natural like the one in your post.

[OldBlue]

I'm not talking about the two people making the hand signs. I'm talking about the liberal media. Will the liberal media call out Newsom the same way they called out Trump?

[sawno]

Its corporate media they only care about advancing the interests of their shareholders. So the only candidates they fairly support are sellouts.

[OldBlue]

That's true, but I don't see why the viewers can't see it.

[sawno]

Their viewers are highly sensitive to authority, if its an established authoritative source such as a big TV network it must be true. Especially if they are citing other authoritative sources such as scientists.

[Astarlessnightsky]

Thats not satanic, thats Angela Merkels signature move.

[OldBlue]

Maybe she is satanic.