What do you think about this video on the moon landing?

[Juxtapose]

Be careful what you comment so quickly because I will know if you watched the video or not.

Updates

3 mo

Some of you people really need to see a psychiatrist.

[Telekinetic-Potato]

Adam is annoying and I don't like him very much but everything in that video about the moon landing is true.

The lighting would have been basically impossible to get. The parallel lines is one thing but the edges of the shadows are razor sharp. And no, a lens can't really do that.

Unless they built a light bulb the size of a large barn, those shadows. Even then it would be a huge MAYBE. For reasons like the way the light bounces off the ground, and the way it darkens across distance.

The inverse square law says that any distance light travels, it's square is how much it's brightness drops. So even a light of that size would have to be really bright and really far away.

The earliest we could have produced an image like that would have been in the late 90's and even the, it probably would have been relatively easy to spot for a modern vfx artist since grain matching technology wasn't so great back then.

[BoopBoopBeep]

The thing is, the people who don't believe it are just going to say "these people are in on it so they're making up science". Most of us don't care because we already understand reality and the others won't find this compelling. That's why we still have flat earthers. As such, i wonder who the target audience is, other than those of us who want to laugh at the conspiracy theorists, but really most of us don't see them as relevant enough to laugh at.

[Juxtapose]

No man, you can talk a conspiracy theorist out of it. I used to believe in the 9/11 conspiracy theory until I looked into it more and then I realized yeah, it was fucking Middle Eastern terrorists.

[Juxtapose]

Science doesn't lie and people interested in the truth can verify the science.

[BoopBoopBeep]

Guess you've had better luck than me then. I've never met a moonlanding/flat earther that was interested in science. They always saw that as "part of the conspiracy"

[Juxtapose]

The entire reason to believe a conspiracy is that the person telling you the official story is compromised and you have some reasonable reason to believe so. It should be based in reality, not blind suspicion.

[Juxtapose]

I believe a lot of the events surrounding covid-19 was in fact a conspiracy but I am open to being proven wrong by reputable sources who are not compromised and can actually show me step-by-step why they are correct.

[GoodGuyBreakingBad]

Not so sure about this one...

[nonyabeez-wax]

The 2016 comment shows their political biases, even after that was debunked.

The whole thing feels like its a straw man argument, setting up the other sides viewpoint, then knocking them down one by one.

Even if I dont believe the moon landing was faked, the video itself feels disingenuous.

Which is part of why I stopped watching their videos.

[Juxtapose]

Did you miss the part where they explained the parallel light rays and how faking that would have been impossible at the time?

What about what they said was wrong and a straw man?

Yeah they made a Trump/Russia joke.. they're modern liberals. I am a Trump supporter but that doesn't poison the whole video.

[nonyabeez-wax]

I said it feels like, as they set up specific outlandish arguments to knock down.

Not necessarily that the counter arguments were wrong in the first place.

Didn't I say that I DONT believe it was faked? I didn't miss the light rays part. They would have needed millions of small white lazers to get that right. Which didn't exist.

Still feels disingenuous.

[Juxtapose]

The reason the opposition looks ridiculous is because they are in fact ridiculous. They could have gotten away with making them look a lot stupider but they actually gave them a fair amount of respect.

[Juxtapose]

I mean what else do you want them to even address? The claims that astronauts could have not survived the radiation when they did in fact have protection against radiation and its documented?

The whole moon landing conspiracy depends on people being stupid and not understanding science. So of course deconstructing their arguments is going to make them look stupid.

[nonyabeez-wax]

No, its the format I think. Of the videos themselves.

They are set up, just like straw man arguments.

Which makes them seem disingenuous. Even when they're not trying to be.

[nonyabeez-wax]

Or when the other arguments are just that outlandish.

[Juxtapose]

To be fair dude it's supposed to be an informative comedy video. You would see the same type of thing on Saturday night live or on The Colbert Report. Colbert used to be so good during the Bush years but now he has woke brain rot.

[Juxtapose]

If you want to see good debates, look up YouTubers who are informed debating each other with a decent moderator at the helm.

[nonyabeez-wax]

I don't watch those shows either. Lol

Even normal political commentators usually do a better job of representing the other side.

Both Tim Pool and Steven Crowder are exceptionally talented at playing 'devils advocate'.

'Comedy' fair enough, that's subjective. Although in my opinion they are failing at it. Lol

[ImHere22]

Nope. I don’t need to watch a stupid movie on youtube to know whatever you’re trying to articulate is trash.
“Moon landing”, “YouTube”, “watch the whole thing”
These words that all together spell: Red Flag.

[Juxtapose]

You probably mistakenly believe I support the moon landing conspiracy, thereby showing me that you are making a false assumption and proving my point.

[Juxtapose]

I do not support that conspiracy and your assumption just makes you look like an ass. Stop being lazy and look into things more in the future.

[normalice]

You should summarize it if you want people to watch it. You tend to bring right wing misinformation here so it's hard to give a click to anything you provide.

[Juxtapose]

Yeah because TruTV is such a hot bed of conservatives xD

JFC you people are dense. You could literally look up where the source comes from without giving it any clicks but you are too lazy to do that.

No, I'm not going to summarize the video.

[normalice]

I can't look up the source without clicking, on this device. Unless I'm going to just trust the thumbnail of whatever you provide, which I do not, i need follow the link to see the channel.

[Juxtapose]

You could literally look at the freaking title and Google it in another tab dude.

[normalice]

But that takes effort. I'm saying if someone is unwilling to put effort into helping you with your reach, a summary might head that off.

[Juxtapose]

If you are really that lazy then quite frankly I don't want much to do with you.

[normalice]

You're asking me to do work you are, yourself, unwilling to do 🤷

[Juxtapose]

You're the one unwilling to CLICK ON A VIDEO because.. you're paranoid about Right Wingers from a liberal entertainment venue 🤣

[normalice]

Nope, just don't trust you because you have never even attempted to give me a reason to.

[Juxtapose]

Good for you.

[Exterminatore]

I’ve never researched into if the landing was faked. The reasons for saying it wasn’t faked in this video don’t seem like great debunking. A lot of that can be overcome fairly easily.

[shortster]

I enjoyed the show when it was on the air.

[Zestyassmf1997]

I think it’s a video.