What do you think about men getting convicted of historic sexual abuse crimes with no evidence?

[Anonymous]

[DarkLegacy]

It quite clearly is bang out of order. Thankfully this type of thing is rare here in the UK. When it came out about BBCs kids entertainer Jimmy Saville we had loads of false allegations aimed at famous people but thankfully no guilty verdicts. In all cases they were charged without any evidence.

However the feminist MPs want men prosecuted without evidence and they even want evidence showing the guys innocence such as the accusers mobile phone data banned from being used in court.

A footballer actually got convicted after the judge would not allow messages from the accusers phone to be shown in court showing she consented, and he won an appeal against his conviction.

[patois]

It's a sign of a corrupt judicial system. If you have DNA evidence, trauma to genitals, defensive wounds, victim testimony, and possibly other evidence like mobile location data, licence plate/traffic camera to put a person in a location then you have a pretty decent case. He said she said bullshit is just that, bullshit especially when its years later.

[MzAsh]

With convictions there’s evidence.

[DarkLegacy]

Bullshit

[MzAsh]

What makes you say that?

[DarkLegacy]

Read my opinion that i posted and i hope it explains

[MzAsh]

Oh, who is the footballer?

[DarkLegacy]

Ched Evans, i think there was another one as well. You are aware im talking about real football here.

[MzAsh]

Oh I see. Well, these are outliers. Witt most convictions, there’s evidence.

[DarkLegacy]

Yes i know, but with historical sexual offences how can they even find evidence.

[Anonymous]

I think guys need to understand the type of women out there today. This is a very real possibility. This is why you keep your nose clean. If it comes down to your word against hers let your word be good. The type of woman that would do something like this doesn't do it once.

[NamerOfStars]

Ask him.

[bolverk]

The convictions are unsafe and will probably be overturned.

[Venüsyenn]

How do we know there is no evidence?

[BarryLiverstone]

Haven’t thought much about it. It’s in the past

[Anonymous]

Well it's obviously wrong.

[slatyb]

Who?

[Badgirlnatalia]

Unfair and terrible