Who Should Be President?

[TheRealPepperPotts]

Would you vote for Natalie or Gal?

Since the tensions are rising around politics in this election year, I thought I'd toss this out here for fun. Stay tuned for more presidential candidate options!

Natalie Portman

Gal Gadot

Updates

1 y

This is for the U. S. presidency, but if you're from across the pond, cast your vote for your own country!

Updates

1 y

I specifically chose non-natural born to emphasize the non-seriousness of the question. It's just for fun, so have fun with it!

[HawkPerception]

I don't know much about either other than some of the movies they've acted in as I don't really care to follow celebrity life. I did happen to look up their personality types to answer this question though. Gal Gadot is evaluated as an ENFJ and Natalie Portman is evaluated to be an INTJ.

Just my personal opinion, but I think an ENFJ would be a slightly better candidate as a president. ENFJs are known to be empathetic, decent with public engagement, and have the ability to build consensus. I think those traits are slightly better for leadership and addressing the needs of the people.

I'm gonna go team Gal

[BCA6010]

Neither of them are eligible to become president because they were both born in Israel.

If that were not a factor, or if this was to become president of Israel, then Gal Gadot and it's not close. She's far closer to being more in line with the needs of the traditional family, and doesn't have a history of random psychotic/emotional breakdowns under pressure. She also has life experience outside of the entertainment industry bubble.

Now if this was a vote for who's the better actress, it's Portman by a lot.

[abc3643]

That's false. Portman's mother has US citizenship and thus Natalie also inherits US citizenship.

[BCA6010]

@abc3643 Nope. She would have to first renounce her Israeli citizenship, as she is a dual citizen. Ted Cruz had to do the same thing for Canada before running in 2016.

[abc3643]

While, personally, any dual-citizen should have to renounce, it's not a Constitutional requirement and thus there is no such law. If a state required that to admit a candidate on the ballot, it would be overturned in SCOTUS as a violation of Article II Section 1 Clause 5:

"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

and the Supremacy Clause, Article 6, Clause 2:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

Ted Cruz wasn't required; he just did.

[northerngal]

Well my guess is either one (if they are eligible) are better than the choices you presently have. One is too old, One is a wack job and one is a Tyrant in waiting. I feels sorry fro voters of the USA.

[strateguy632]

the tyrant... we ALREADY hav look at what is happening to biden political opponent!
better trump who already showed how good he was and...
that the "worries" were false fear mongering.

[dustybiker2]

@northerngal Agreed

[Lynx122]

I'd definitely vote for Portman out of these 2, she seems a lot more intelligent. Some of her movies also have some depth, like Black Swan and V for Vendetta. Listening to Gal Gadot speak is painful.

[Neatfinity_YT]

Nothing because they don’t have political views that would help the country thrive. They wouldn’t even pass to be on seat. But then again, no one who has ever been voted was ever fit to be president in the first place I’m not sure who these people are. I am Canadian so do with that information as you will

[RebelinSteel]

The person who is best for the party and country.
Its ability not gender or colour that decides who would lead a party.

Also here we vote in a party, it’s really only when the leader is a fuckwit do people really care overly much.

[strateguy632]

for me gal gadot activism is less annoying than natali portman.

they are skilled and beauties but neither for leadership... from these 2, gadot.

[AviatorTom]

If these are the only two choices...

I'd have to write-in a candidate. Neither is qualified. They were both born in Israel, and US Constitution requires a native-born Americsn.

[abc3643]

That's not correct. The Constitution requires a "natural-born citizen". Portman is a "natural-born citizen" due to birthright citizenship via her mother who is a dual American-Israeli citizen.

[strateguy632]

idealy but obama didn't have to show his birth certificate!

[abc3643]

@strateguy632 That's right; he didn't need to because it's not a constitutional requirement to show your birth certificate to be president. However, ultimately, to put racist "birther" issue to rest, he did give permission to let the State of Hawaii release his birth certificate. Obama, born in Hawaii, was a natural-born citizen, but he could have been born in M31, The Great Galaxy of Andromeda, because his mother was an American citizen and children of American citizens are themselves American citizens no matter where they are born.

[abc3643]

Gal Gadot is not a natural-born US citizen and, thus, cannot be President.
Natalie Portman is due to birthright citizenship.

[KostasKouvalis]

Well, they were both born in Israel, so they can't. But assuming they could, Gal by a longshot. Gal went from being a self-hating Jew to seeing the light and condemning Hamas, while Natalie appears to be a full fledged Libtard

[mb120101]

I don't know but I’m leaving the country if that happens

[MisterWack]

I wouldn’t vote for either.
I’d vote Amy Klobuchar or Elizabeth Warren over these.

[MisterWack]

Context: Question was only for non national born women because it was for fun, didn’t see the update until now…

[ohsheeT]

I don't know them and so you ased the question I'm just going to vote for you

[exitseven]

Natalie Portman. She is hotter than Wondr Woman.

[abc3643]

and her kids can use The Force!

[OptimusThyme1050]

Neither should be, but if I'm forced to choose, I would say, Natalie Portman, and only because she didn't start the thankfully short-lived Beetles' "Imagine:" tend.

[Massageman]

I've thought about having a "gal" for prez. Can't do worse than slo jo.

[Iron_Man]

President of what the home owners association?, I don’t even know them

[LadiesFavoriteToy]

Non of them... I vote for people who are smart and not stupid retards like the current people. Nor based on their gender.

[Dongie]

No competition. That Gal one. The second one. Smokin eyes.

[Dongie]

I'm not talking election. I picked the prettiest and most sexified one.

[Anonymous]

Neither. But if I had to choose Gal. Natalie would be too far to the left.

[Enginn]

Hard to decide. Both of them look hot. I'll go with Natalie

[Anonymous]

wonder woman > she thor

[Rieper893]

The one with bigger ASS! Sorry I am perverted fuck, and one who gives the best blow job

[Anonymous]

Nah, I'd have to vote 3rd Party (Randall Terry) if these were the options

[OddBeMe]

Def nat over gal. Smarter is better.

[Siri137]

A couple of fanatical Zionists? Get lost!

[strateguy632]

hilarious! they criticize israel. just kuz someone is jewish doesn't mean they are zionists...
but your equation shows... anti zionist stretches to any jew... so really racism.

[Siri137]

@strateguy632 So I'm racist. Big deal. I don't care that you don't approve of my opinion.
For the record, I haven't heard either of them criticise the Israeli government, and one of them (Gadot) was actually in the Israeli Army, was she not?

[TonyMetal___86]

None, i'm against women for presidency!

[sage2021]

No and I mean NO woman should ever be President of the United States of America 🇺🇸 EVER!

Look at what happened to Liz Truss
the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
She quit after only 6 weeks because people didn't like her policy's. She triggered turmoil and financial ruin for the people.

THIS IS A VERY GOOD EXAMPLE WHEN A WOMAN WANTS TO BREAK THE GLASS CEILING BUT DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL SHE'S DOING!

KIND OF LIKE AMERICA'S VIP KAMALA HARRIS. SHE SHOULD HAVE RESIGNED AFTER HER FIRST WEEK IN OFFICE.
THE WORLD IS STILL LAUGHING AT OUR TWO TOP LEADER'S
MUTT AND JEFF 🤡

[strateguy632]

to tony i agree each one made some awful decisions but we can't group all... it should be case by case i woulda liked condaliza rice!

[TonyMetal___86]

@strateguy632 there are some women who are better than males for presidency but why do we have to accept or choose between these two, give me option 3 which is a real man so i'll pick him over the others!

[AngryCarl]

They're both as bad as each other.

[loveslongnails]

George Carlin

[Anonymous]

Jewish women?

This ain't Mexico

[MacDaddyRico]

Neither if they support Israel

[msc545]

Neither. NO woman ever.

[DrPepper12]

Huh?

[Anonymous]

When women have power evil things happen.

[SotiCoto]

No. Just no.

[Wise4myage]

Natalie.😊

[HurremSultan]

Horrible choices

[Anonymous]

Neither