Is it justified?

[vj0090]

People who r 75 or even 80 can become member of parliament or can become prime minister or even president.. can enjoy unlimited benefits / perks (basis the position they hold).

On the other hand a middle class family person who is a bloody tax payer... who is running family of 4..5 or even more... is the only earner in family... has to retire and cannot work after retirement age (58 or 60 - whatever that is in respective country)

Why these politician don't retire at 60.. why not they just go out and give way for new blood to come and lead...

[katiesmuff]

Obviously you are not US as retirement age here is many years more than that for most.
Lot of things to wonder about with our horseshit politicians with ego's

[vj0090]

by the way what's the retirement age there?

[RavVid]

Well it would be constitutional change in my country. It is undemocratic to exclude specific classes of people from the democratic process.

Plus the 60+ will start rioting and burning down cities.

[Billlewis]

No, we won't. We'll just move away, thereby cutting the available tax dollars for the stuffed shirted tribal antagonists and network talking heads.

[RavVid]

@Billlewis A tax revolt would be effective. I was watching a YT on Baton Rouge last night.

[Billlewis]

Exactly.

[Aubrey97]

There's a minimum age for a reason so there really ought to be a maximum age for the same reason.