Is the election in the US becoming a battle between Men and Women?

[ManInChains]

Yes

No

[Dongie]

That is exactly what the democrats want. If they can't get your vote or fuck you out of it then they'll settle for just screwing a part of your life up. Because think it, if you ain't voting for them they couldn't care less of your surviaval.

[TonyMetal___86]

Idc what it is!
Trump is the next president!

[TonyMetal___86]

Thanks for the mho!

[sage2021]

Kamala Harris knows that abortion is very high on the list for making campaign promises.

I heard her back a few weeks ago saying that the laws about abortions will change when she is president.
In my eyes, Kamala is for killing babies! And women want a choice. Remember, their body, their rights?
That would be an absolute travesty if winning the presidential election was based on killing babies.
I have said this before and I will say it again

BIRTH CONTROL PEOPLE!!!

[TonyMetal___86]

Every person who allows to kill babies should be allowed to be killed!

[abc3643]

Well, for the past 50 years, it always sort of has been...

The GOP generally supports "conservative" policies and such policies are usually not in the best interests of women. Thus, women have a tendency to vote Democratic because they espouse policies that either help women or are important to women.

[Razp_Sorbet]

the USA is really still living in the distant past. It's insane to me that people will talk about how senile Biden was but then turn a blind eye to the incoherent shit that comes out of Trump's mouth and say someone who thinks Hannibal Lecter was a good guy (and real) and wants to end democracy is better than someone who wants to make healthcare and schooling affordable and accessible...

[handsomelad70]

A half-century of defunding and/or dumbing down schools to pay for wars.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Possibly, most likely due to the fact that Republicans made it that way by attacking women's rights, including abortion, and even some radical Republicans in the private sector even questioning if women should even have the right to vote on social media. When you start forcing children (and I don't even mean teens) who were raped to be pregnant and have babies, you know you're the bad guy in that situation. That's why women are fighting back.

[Chthou95]

Women shouldn't vote though

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

See above for a terrible take that proves my point.

[Chthou95]

Yes i read it and some of the things you brought up that the Republicans are doing is pretty based

[handsomelad70]

@Chthou95 Nice turn-of-the-NINETEENTH century talk, boyo !!!

[Chthou95]

@handsomelad70 She needed rescuing?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Pretty sure that wasn't a rescue attempt as opposed to just calling out your poor stance on women on my post.

[handsomelad70]

@Chthou95 Who needed rescuing, or am I missing something as I sometimes do?

[Chthou95]

How is it a poor stance?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

"Women shouldn't vote"

Your words. It's a god awful stance that eliminates half the voices of this country just so you and others like you can be sexist.

[Chthou95]

And i stand by that. Women shouldn't vote and for a good reason

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

There is no good reason. You are just flat out wrong.

[Chthou95]

They shouldn't vote because in general they make decisions based on emotional responses.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Like I said, no good reason and you just proved it. Thanks for making my point.

[ManInChains]

To add to @Chthou95's point, men are the ones who have to suffer through majority of the things women vote for while women don't have to.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

*yawn* Another terrible point.

[Chthou95]

That is a very good reason as to why they shouldn't vote. In general women operate on feelings, men operate on logic

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Even if that were true, that doesn't mean we don't deserve a voice when it comes to voting.

As I said, it's a terrible reason.

[Chthou95]

Its a valid reason because why should any big decisions be based around feelings? That's dangerous

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

No, it's not, and we use logic as well, so the point isn't even valid.

On top of that, we have the 19th amendment protecting our right to vote, so it's not like you can stop us anyway.

Just because you don't like it doesn't make a difference. Because facts don't care about your feelings on the matter.

[handsomelad70]

@Chthou95 Like the BOYS who vote for Trump?

[Chthou95]

Generally speaking women dont use logic as much as men do. The decisions are are override by an emotional response most of the time. And you do realize men gave you those rights

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Women fought for those rights and will again if "men" ever try to take them away. That's why I believe the democrats will win this election cycle as women are pissed about what men have been doing to their health rights.

[exitseven]

Not all women support the idea of abortion on demand.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

But a lot more do than don't. That's why abortion rights passed in even red states like Kentucky, Kansas and Ohio.

[HighValue]

They include exceptions for abortions when it is from rape, incest, or the mother's health is at serious risk. But democrats constantly LIE about that, so go ahead ms Democrat and keep lying as usual.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Texas abortion laws make no exceptions for rape or incest. Same for Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.

Maybe you should do some research before YOU come on here spouting lies.

Also, I'm not a Democrat, I just speak the truth about the situation.

[Chthou95]

But men at the end of the day grant you those privileges. Society and politics only exist because men have created it and keep the infrastructure running today. Without men, you wouldn't have any rights

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Lmao that's just a pathetic excuse to make yourselves feel more powerful because of your weakening power structure here in Western culture.

[HighValue]

1. Nationally there are always exceptions for the mother's health, rape, and incest.
2. People can just go to the next state over if they don't like it. It is a state's rights issue because abortion has NEVER been in the constitution.
3. The other man is correct. MEN did create the infrastructure and almost everything in society and women would have nothing if it wasn't for men. Women contributed very little to society by comparison for thousands of years.

[Chthou95]

How is it a weakling power structure if its the same one that's still implemented today?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Some states are locked by other states that have the same laws, like Louisiana, for example. Plus, not everyone has the money to just travel like that. It can be expensive for food and gas.

Men only had power then because it wasn't illegal to beat your wife to keep her in line and under men's control. That doesn't exist anymore, thankfully. So anyone claiming men created everything and that men can take it all away are living an incel dream.

[Chthou95]

Incel blah blah blah. You really believe that women would be able to establish anything or create a set of laws without the help of men?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

I believe men and women work together in their own ways to make a society. It's not just me who create a society and as I said, anyone who says otherwise is an incel

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Men*

[ManInChains]

Actually, it is still legal to beat women. You just have to claim to identify as a woman and join women’s boxing leagues 😂

[ManInChains]

Women encourage their own beatings

[Chthou95]

It's always been men who built society. Men built society for people (Men, women and children). Without men women would still be living in grass huts right now. Women need men more than they think they don't. Not just for rights and amendments. But just to survive they need men

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Incorrect. As I said, we all built society in our own ways. And we certainly don't need men for our rights or for survival. For example, you can watch Naked and Afraid and watch women outlast men and build their own shelters and survive off the land. We really don't need men outside of procreation and companionship. However, it's nice to have them around to help build a society together.

You are mistaking men's physical strength compared to women as a precursor to them being the dominant gender, but women have not only fought for their rights they control other aspects of both the relationship and other parts of society. Sure, men can build a house, but women can make it a home.

[Chthou95]

Men built society. You're delusional if you think women built the infrastructure with men. A rare few women here and there helped but Exceptions don't disprove the general rule. Men not only built 99.99% of everything but also dominate in most of the jobs that keep the society running. (Construction, sewage, electrical grid, military, law enforcement, coal mining, logging, architecture etc). Hell guns wouldn't even exist if men weren't here which are a practical and important tool for keeping societies safe. All the rights you have and the ability to be able to choose what you want to do wouldn't be a thing if men didn't allow you to. Men are the backbone of society as much as feminists want to deny that

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

*yawn* Again, this is what you need to believe to make yourself feel superior, and you simply are just not. And honestly guns were a terrible invention so I wouldn't go bragging about that one

[Chthou95]

That's your rebuttal? A personal attack rather than attacking the argument which is factual. And disagree. Guns are amazing and the 2nd ammendment is important. Its a Man made tool that every civilian should have the right to own.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

I'm not saying everyone should have the right to own one.. im saying the shouldn't have been invented in the first place. It only led to escalations in war and led to the crime violence and mass shootings we see in this country today.

I also ignored your list because you left out inventions that women either self created or helped create. It also ignores the inventions women created that men stole credit for.

[Chthou95]

Majority of inventions were created by men. In general men make up the ideas and make them come to life. And the invention of guns is genius. They serve multitude of purposes. And war was already here before guns. Bows, arrows, swords, fire etc. Guns were the evolution and will always be here

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Men create war and conflict and only escalate that with inventing weapons of war. It's stupid and just terrible inventions.

[Chthou95]

Bad people create wars and others stop them. But guns are great inventions. The genius and innovatiom that comes with creating those things is amazing. Long live the 2nd ammendment

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Bad people who are men no doubt. Don't forget to claim that one for men. Same ones who are creating all the mass shootings in our schools and our streets. All mostly men.

[Chthou95]

Okay and the people stopping bad men are other men. Without good men, you wouldn't be able to overpower bad men or be able to stop them

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

It took you 3 days to think of that? 3 days? You could have just let this conversation end but no you took 3 days to think of a rebuttal.

Both men and women stop bad people or did you forget there are female officers, female members of the military, female politicians?

Talk to you again in 3 more days if you have a new rebuttal.

[Chthou95]

Relax, I wasn't on the site n just got back on today. And most of military and law enforcement is made primarily of men. If women weren't allowed to be soldiers or police officers, it wouldn't effect the two jobs any differently

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

And yet women still exist in those positions which still makes my point valid. Stop trying to make your point a thing.

[handsomelad70]

He likely IS an incel.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Yep!

[Chthou95]

Because my point is a thing. You have a hard time thinking in generalities. In general most men make up the military and law enforcement. If women weren't allowed to be in these areas of work anymore, it wouldn't hinder or effect those jobs in anyway shape or form since men were already doing them

[Chthou95]

@handsomelad70 Incel blah blah blah. That word is used now for any kind of disagreement or arguments men have

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Incel is fitting for you though.. you are so desperate to make men seem way more important than they are because you hate women for some reason. Guys have their purpose, but they aren't the end all, be all of society.

[Chthou95]

They are important. Feminists are delusional thinking can survive without men. They crumble at the first sign of trouble. And do i hate women or do i just not kiss women's asses and push back on a lot of their arguments?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Yeah, I figured you were arguing, just to argue. You haven't had a real point this entire time. Nobody said we can survive without men. They are kinda needed in procreation, for example. They are just not as important as you are making them out to be. Society will collapse if men and women stop working together. However if all men disappeared, society would still go on until we eventually all died out

[Chthou95]

And they're needed beyond pro creation. If women went extinct, society would still function and operate, however men would simply stop trying and not feel as motivated. What would be the point if there's nothing to work for.

[Chthou95]

One needs the other to survive and one needs the other to have a purpose

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

We don't need men to survive outside of procreation that's what you don't get. We can do just fine as a society of women. You say men keep us safe from other men, but if men didn't exist then we wouldn't have a problem in the first place, would we?

[Chthou95]

Its easy for you to say that when you've never been in a situation where men weren't running and maintaining the structure of society. There has never been a matriarchal society that has ever survived. Without men, no buildings, no electricity, no cars, no houses etc. Feminists gotta cope with this but they need even though their delusional brains won't accept it

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

There have been matrilineal societies in history where men and women were equals. And there was one matriarchal society in China. Men just stomp through and try to claim everything is theirs which proves my point that there wouldn't be those issues if men weren't around. Society would be fine.

Here read this and see if it helps you realize that.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

www.nationalgeographic.com/.../angela-saini-patriarchy-matriarchy-gender-equality

[handsomelad70]

Didn't you read that this Algerian boxer is a WOMAN, boyo?

[Chthou95]

And that proves my point, that women wouldn't be able to do anything if bad men wanted to take over. That matriarchal society didn't last. And also were men still a part of that matriarchal society?

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

If men didn't exist then it wouldn't have happened, now would it? Good or bad. We were doing just fine up til then.

[Chthou95]

Who's to say, women haven't been in positions of leadership or authority that long for that to be the final conclusion

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

So we are in agreement that men fucked up our opportunities to find out? Good to know. So what I said stands.

[Chthou95]

They don't want to see the risk. Besides why change something, that's been working for hundreds and hundreds of years now

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

It's not working with male driven societies. Tons of men dying in wars and violence. You don't get that with female leaders. Women are better leaders because they foster peace and order. They create instead of destroying. We communicate instead of fight and kill each other.

[ManInChains]

@Ez-Bri-Z_v2 Throughout history, queens were more likely to wage war than kings - qz.com/.../throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

What your article also mentions and I've also found in other locations is that unmarried queens were often forced into wars because of men trying to claim their lands due to perceived weakness. For example, King Frederick II of Prussia, declaring no woman should hold power over anything. So again my point stands that men are the cause of wars. If men didn't try to ruin female led societies, then this stat wouldn't hold true.

[Chthou95]

If that's the case, why do women prefer to work with men or have a male boss over a female?

[Chthou95]

"We communicate instead of fighting"

Women dont even do that. In general women are afraid of confrontation

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Where did you pull that information from? I have no problem who I work for gender wise.

And we aren't afraid of confrontation, we just do it more politely.

[ManInChains]

I thought women hated each other. While men tend to get along better with other men

[Chthou95]

Congrats, that's you. Im talking in general womem prefer male bosses/leaders. Womens way of dealing with confrontation is simply avoiding it

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

What is me? I just said I don't care who I work for gender wise. It could be a man, woman, or anything in between.

[Chthou95]

Again that's (You). Im talking in the general sense. Why do women have a hard time thinking in general

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

I don't agree though. I believe most don't care.

[Chthou95]

Most do care. Women would rather work for a man. With other women, the likelihood of drama goes up

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Hard disagree.

[Chthou95]

Be my guess. Im not gonna lose any sleep over this

[lightbulb27]

no but it may be spun that way as abortion rights becomes key issue again and people have their "hills they will die on".

some women are hard this side or that... so no.

[normalice]

Republicans are trying to make it into one because they know otherwise no one is stupid enough to vote republican based on merit. But men have the option of not falling for it.

[handsomelad70]

But many are dumb enough to fall for it.

[CuriousHubby]

No just a pissing contest like normal. Most of the women don't even want her as president.

Not like hilery

[HighValue]

People would have to be very immoral and low quality to vote Democrat after recent years. Anybody that votes for them is a lost cause.

[Dargil]

It's a battle of good and evil.

[ManInChains]

Are there more good or evil men?
Are there more good or evil women?

[Dargil]

We are all capable of evil. Why G0d gave us free will and a path to salvation.

[Chthou95]

That could be a part od it but its going to be a battle for other things. Not solely just gender wars

[DrPepper12]

I think its even between trump and kamala BUT its the independent suburban women that will decide this

[exitseven]

I think black voters will play a bigger role in this.

[exitseven]

No it is a battle of Normal and Crazy.

[mrkdvsn]

More like a battle between Good and Evil.