Biden/ Harris Allegedly Put Tulsi Gabbard On Terror Watchlist?

[Ladsin2]

According to Tulsi the Biden-Harris administration has placed her on a terrorist watchlist due to speaking out against Harris. Do you think this is true? If it's true is it anti-democratic?

Kamala says she believes in freedom, but I was put on a secret terror watch list after I publicly criticized her. No one will be safe from political retaliation under a Harris administration. I put my life on the line for this country. Now the government calls me a terror threat. pic.twitter.com/3xjgjmrLhD

— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) September 4, 2024

I think it's true, but it doesn't matter

I think it's true, and it's a big deal

I Don't think it's true

I don't care.

[NamerOfStars]

I heard that it had happened, and in light of Tulsi's tearing Kamala apart (verbally) during the 2020 primaries, I suspected she'd come after her in revenge- and was actually impressed that she hadn't; guess I was wrong. On the other hand, I've yet to see actual EVIDENCE of it, though of course that's hard with a "secret" watchlist.

Harris was supposed to slink off into ignominious obscurity and shame, and to give her credit, that's what she'd started to do before Biden called her back in as a literal diversity hire. I have no problem whatsoever in believing she'd do this. But I still don't KNOW that it's true, so...

[Ladsin2]

If true is it problematic?

[NamerOfStars]

It's criminal.

[Ladsin2]

Thanks

[MisterWack]

“ According to Tulsi “
One, It would be a publicly available list and two there would be more sources than “trust me bro”.

[Ladsin2]

I presume you don't think it's true then. What would convince you otherwise? Also if it turns out to be true would that be problematic?

[MisterWack]

@ladsin2 Well look, I go by multiple sources like newspapers, media, radio, etc. and direct sources like govt websites & bills & what have you.
Only sources using actual evidence and the actual evidence being from govt websites or official documents would lead me to believe it is true.

Alex Jones of Infowars claimed Sandy Hook was faked and the children were paid actors along with the parents… He was never right and in this same way, how much is Tulsi playing to the whims of her demographic of supporters by telling them something they would want to be true and has complete disregard for truth.

[MisterWack]

2nd part: She claims to be part of a secret terror watchlist so…. Literally admitting “trust me” is the source. If she knows she’s part of it, clearly she would present real evidence in the form of a document / legal papers / message from DOJ & FBI & CIA themselves not twiddling her thumbs on Twitter.

[Ladsin2]

To see if I understand you correctly. If you don't see it on a mainstream new source, or unless the government acknowledges it as true you wouldn't believe it? My second question was if it turns out to be true, would you have a problem with that?

[MisterWack]

@ladsin2 🙄, did you turn your brain off?
She said it was on a government list so, clearly there would be a piece of evidence. Smoke n gun, you know?
Secondly, it would be reported by someone outside Tulsi’s Twitter Account to be verified.

I don’t go by just one source, I got by many sources especially if it is official documents / other form of evidence.

[Ladsin2]

No. I don't think you read so very good. I'm asking you if those are the only two sources of information you would trust. 1) The Government itself, or 2) major news media. It's a pretty straightforward question.

My second question you also skipped again. Would it be bad if it turned out to be true?