Do you think that Democrats are willing to start World War III nuclear war as long as it keeps President Trump out of the White House?

[RingOfFire]

Under the Harris-Biden administration:

• Open borders with thousands of known terrorists already inside the country
• Two escalating wars started in two of the most dangerous parts of the world with no end in sight costing American taxpayers a fortune in taxes and putting their lives in grave danger.

• Democrats tried to sabotage President Trump's 2016 campaign to stop him.
  When that didn't work they tried to sabotage his presidency to stop him.
  When that didn't work they tried to impeach him to stop him.
  When that didn't work they tried to put him in prison to stop him.
  When that didn't work they tried to kill him (TWICE).

They cannot beat him so their only hope of staying in power is to eliminate him. And it seems like they will stop at NOTHING to do it.

Experts say that the United States is in the most dangerous national security crisis in its history under the Harris-Biden administration facing a catastrophic event if someone doesn't get our security under control.

Do you think the Democrats are willing to let the entire country be destroyed and Americans be killed as long as it prevents President Trump from being reelected by the people? They would rather see the American people dead than let them reelect him?

[razelove]

I think Democrats are willing to burn through money and all our munition and fuel stockpiles to win.

How many people do you think are ruining their financial future banking on Biden to win, and defaulting on their student loans? The consequences for paying them got removed as long as he's in office, and there are some people dumb enough to stop paying them.

They are never going to be "forgiven" and they're letting the interest outrun the principle by doing so. All for that belief in a magic solution, they're making it so they can never retire. 12 years of payments turning into 15 or 20.

If you're willing to screw over your supporters like that, what other bridges wouldn't you be willing to burn? What comparable butt fuckery have Republicans done to their supporters?

[ProbablyClueless]

It seems pretty obvious that they are; it all boils down to an issue of control.

One of the most ardent anti-Trumpers I know has expressly stated that he has no problem with starting wars to "protect the world from Trump." He totally ignores the reality of any of Trump's policies. It's literally just Charlie spewing hatred and venom. At this point, his problems with Trump are purely about his own ego and not wanting to admit that he was wrong.

Charlie prides himself a great deal on having the insights no one else has and seeing the truth through the noise. Unfortunately, he's gotten everything wrong about Trump, Covid, social issues, etc for the last 7-8 years, at least.

It's really sad to see, but a whole lot of the left wing of this country has decided that the country is a shit hole and will burn down, and they are fully dedicated to making that happen.

[Anonymous]

young men have been trending conservative for the past few years

a military draft is exactly what the Democrats need to delete the number of young conservative voters for future elections when they get sent off to die in a war

with less male conservative voters, they can outnumber the small number of female conservative voters with their sheer number of female liberal voters

sure, male liberal voters would get caught in the crossfire under the military draft too but that's a small price they're willing to pay

[CuriousHubby]

Definitely yes! They will believe any lie they are told just to keep Trump out of the White House.

She has shown she is not good at doing her job! So we make her president!

She is clearly a suck up power hungery woman. Honestly I'd take Hillary over her!

[bluesparrow]

It's pretty fucked up that you would take Hillary over Kamala, but I agree with you.

[CuriousHubby]

@bluesparrow maybe but one is not a suck up to old men.
Just wish there would have been a 3rd choice. Both suck

[buzzword]

Not solely because of Trump, but yes they are willing to nuke an American city in order to blame another power and instigate a war with other nuclear powers in order to maintain control over people.

[RealLifeHarleyQuinn]

Its really sad that all of what you said makes perfect sense. Its also come to the fact that we are being taxed to death and that is why we left England and now we are the very thing we fought to stay away from.

[RingOfFire]

It's painfully sad, you are not alone.

For centuries, people have fled socialist and communist countries and dictatorships to come to America where they would be free.

And now only to find that the Democrats are turning America into a communist third world dictatorship with confiscatory taxes and a Draconian iron fist.

https://youtu.be/jJnShBMG3uY?feature=shared

[DextroShade]

I 100% believe they would burn the country down to keep Trump from having it. These people are deranged and should have never been allowed anywhere near any form. of power or authority.

[Tstrbrainer]

Definitely not a nuclear war, there's no money in that for anyone

[RingOfFire]

Good one! 😂

[Tstrbrainer]

I think the profitable ones are the kinds of which are happening currently.

[ManOnFire]

I think it is far more likely for Putin to start nuclear war - and a lot sooner - than it is for passive Democrats. And I am one by the way.

[RingOfFire]

The war was started because the Democrats enabled Putin to make hundreds of billions of dollars from selling its oil after Trump had Russia on the verge of bankruptcy by cutting off their energy sales. Among other things Trump stopped the Nordstream 2 pipeline and when Harris-Biden got in they removed Trump's ban on it. And just like Iran is using the money they made when Harris-Biden reversed Trump's restrictions on their oil exports, Putin is using that money to fund the Ukraine war.

So Harris-Biden and the Democrats are already to blame for both wars and anything that happens because of them.

But now, Biden is talking about supplying Ukraine with long range missiles it can use to fire deep into Russia. Putin has threatened that it would be an act of war and that he would consider it a war with America... putting nuclear war on the table.

So even if it is Putin who fires the nukes first, it is the Democrats who would be the ones who caused it.

[ManOnFire]

@RingOfFire I would say Yes and No. I do 100% blame Biden for Putin invading Ukraine, because Biden was pretty much baiting him in the weeks leading up to it. Biden was probably thinking that the war would backfire on Putin - which it has to some degree - and that he would be utterly destroyed, causing Communist Russia to collapse. But this still does not mean Democrats would've caused WWIII. You're forgetting that the EU has also played an enormous role in helping Ukraine, and some of those leaders are the European equivalents of Republicans.

Trump did more damage to Russia by cutting off Nordstream 2, and if he was the president right now and Putin still went into Ukraine, I don't think he would've done a much better job at handling that. Putin takes Trump less seriously than he does Biden, he knows Trump doesn't know what he's talking about half the time, so he probably would've felt even better about going into Ukraine.

[RingOfFire]

"Putin takes Trump less seriously than he does Biden,"

Which clearly explains why Putin invaded Ukraine while Obama was President and stole Crimea from them. Did nothing while Trump was President for 4 years, and as soon as Biden got in office Putin invaded Ukraine again.

I think you've got that all wrong. Between Nord stream 2, sanctions Trump put on Russia and their oil sales, and Trump's supplying Eastern Europe with long-range missiles that could hit targets in Russia, Trump was the toughest president against Putin since he's been in office and one of the toughest on Russia ever.

Russia was on the verge of collapse until Biden took office and reversed every one of Trump's policies which ended up allowing Russia to become stronger than it has been in decades.

[ManOnFire]

@RingOfFire Definitely a true point that Putin did nothing while Trump was in office. However Putin was only biding his time. He was going to do what he wanted anyway. What's to say he still wouldn't have if Trump was still in office on a second term?

[RingOfFire]

Because:

1) Putin didn't have the money to invade Ukraine when Trump was in office because Trump's policies drove Russia to the brink of bankruptcy. By Trump's second term Russia would have had an economic collapse. The last thing on his and the Russian peoples' mind was war.

2) Putin feared Trump. He has no respect at all for Biden and even less for Harris. He watched them bungle the Afghanistan withdrawal, tolerate the Chinese spy balloon while it invaded our airspace from coast to coast collecting top secret information, and say to Putin "Well we wouldn't mind if you just make a small incursion into Ukraine." Putin knew he was weak and he could step all over him. Not so with Trump. He wouldn't have dared invade Ukraine even if he was able. Trump infuriated Putin when he sent missiles and missile defense systems to eastern Europe against Putin's warnings. He knew that Trump was no one to mess with.

President Trump is the only president in half a century not to get America into any new wars. Instead he used economic leverage to prevent war and strengthen the US economy at the same time. His strategy was both brilliant and effective. He kept world peace until it was completely destroyed by Biden and Harris.

[RingOfFire]

PS:
At the same time that Biden undid President Trump's ban on the Nord stream 2 pipeline bringing in hundreds of billions of dollars that allowed Putin to fund the war against Ukraine, he canceled the Keystone Pipeline in America which cost Americans hundreds of billions of dollars in lost economic growth and higher energy prices.

And you think that Putin would rather have Trump in office and Kamala Harris?

I think he is salivating over the prospect of Harris winning the election. He will walk all over her and all over you and the rest of the people of the free world at the same time if she wins. And so will China, Iran, North Korea, and some of the most dangerous people in the world.

The result will be a catastrophe for world stability and very possibly a world war unlike any other before it.

[ManOnFire]

@RingOfFire I will definitely agree that Biden fucked up big time on the Keystone pipeline. A thousand percent. And I do also believe the world will walk all over Kamala. I imagine most of her actions in needing to be aggressive on the world scene will not be her own but very likely at the behest of her male peers.

[onedarkcloud]

NOBODY WINS WE WILL BE ALL DEAD!!! Mutually assured destruction.

[Kingofkings1992]

You betcha. They are legitimately that psychotic about Trump. They know that they cannot defeat him

[Anonymous]

Yeah they'll end the world to say they've won from space

[ABC1x1x]

The Democrats are willing to destroy everything to stay in power no matter how undeserving they are

[bluesparrow]

Yes.,

[bluesparrow]

[RingOfFire]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Anonymous]

I don't see the poll, but I'd say probably.

[nolabels]

So it seems.

[Dongie]

Yes.