So she lied about their ethnicity and also lied about standing next to her grandmother because her grandmother's death certificate says she died before Kamala Harris was even born LOL.
1 ySimple, she's lied about everything and will continue too. As a matter of fact she's not legally qualified to be president. Neither of her parents were citizens at the time of her birth. Most of all neither of them are natural born citizens and at least one has to be in order for her to qualify. But the dimoKKKrats got away with it with obammy. They still haven't provided a legitimate birth certificate for that POS. You don't need special software to prove it. All you have to do is look at his race on the one they provided. It says African American. That term hadn't even been invented at the time of his birth. His race would have been N**** at that time. Plus the fact that copy, the legal long form, can't be found online anymore. All that's available is the "certificate of live birth" and that form isn't accepted as a legal form to identify someone. The dimoKKKrats have lied at every turn and they'll keep doing it because they keep getting away with it.
10 Reply
Most Helpful Opinions
18.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Harris’ mother, Shyamala Gopalan, self-identified as Caucasian in her daughter’s 1964 birth certificate.
Caucasus Mountains being a known attraction between east and west Asia.
03 Reply
1 yKamala recently did that slow pitch interview on MSNBC. The next day, Stephanie Ruhle Said that Kamala can’t even answer the simplest of questions. That’s her own team calling her out for her bullshit. So of course she has to lie about her race, because what else does she have?
30 Reply
- 341 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yDon't most people have at least 2 sets of grandparents?
Anyway I rather someone lies about their own dead grandparents ethnicity than about a bunch of alive strangers who will get threatened and harassed bc of the lies (Springfield).
028 Reply- 1 y
Yeah I know, she was referring to a specific grandmother who is dead.
There is actual evidence for what is happening in Springfield. Eyewitness testimony is evidence enough for further investigation and eyewitness testimony can even put people away in prison because of the person testifying. - 1 y
Every single "eyewitness" in Springfield admitted they either lied or just guessed, and didn't have any real evidence like actually seeing it. They just thought a pet was missing & assumed the (legal) migrants must have eaten it! Fr.
- 1 y
"the guy" who? What's his name? Can you provide "direct proof" he's NOT lying? This is America, we do immocent until proven guilty. Take accusations seriously but they don't count as proof unless verifiable. I certainly hope you don't want every nameless accusation to be taken as enough proof to convict someone...
- 1 y
Innocent*
- 1 y
It is being investigated further, and so far they've found: zero evidence.
- 1 y
I've held a goose b4. Show me the photo let's see it, if it is so damning
- 1 y
https://static.toiimg.com /thumb/msid-113329322, width-1280 , height-720, imgsize-1908970, resizemode-6, overlay- toi_sw, pt-32, y_pad-40/photo. jpg
I had to break it up because the website is being stupid. - 1 y
No worries gag is awful w pictures. Thanks for leaving the little watermark in the corner. I was able to find the article about it from TOI
"A viral photo of a man carrying two geese which stirred controversy and confusion after being linked to recent claims by former President Donald Trump. The image, which has been widely shared online, was initially used to support rumors that Haitian immigrants in Ohio were eating pets. However, officials have clarified the real story behind the photograph.
According to TMZ, the Ohio Division of Wildlife has confirmed that the man seen in the photo was not involved in any nefarious activities. Instead, he was simply collecting two geese that had been struck by a car in Columbus, Ohio. The location of the incident is significant because it is about 45 minutes away from Springfield, where recent rumors about Haitian immigrants originated." - 1 y
You could wait for evidence. Like you're usually supposed to do in a country that has a justice system, with claims so huge & ridiculous that there should be plenty of evidence if this is really happening or not. Who am I going to believe? The people who have every reason to try and slander immigrants as a wedge issue, even with NO evidence? Or the people who are saying what the lack of evidence would make seem clear: Haitian immigrants are NOT eating pets in Springfield Ohio.
- 1 y
Actually it is the state officials and the deep state who have the greatest interest in covering this up. Biden and Harris are unleashing criminal aliens all over the United States to fluff up congressional seats. Yes, you can get more congressional seats if your state or district has more people in it even if they are criminal aliens.
- 1 y
@Juxtapose the issue seems to be that you trust random individuals to feed you information but citizen-made journalism is random, unverifiable, amateur and unsupervised so what can you expect when you choose to trust sources like this?
- 1 y
If people were eating pets in Springfield, there WOULD be evidence. People who made the claims would be willing to testify, they wouldn't change their mind a few days later & say "sorry I found my pet after all oops!" They would be posting ACTUAL photos bc there's no way people could be stealing pets all the time & not get caught. There would be legit accusations against specific people for specific pets (pets that are ACTUALLY missing & whose remains could ACTUALLY be found associated with the accused).
It's only a cover up if something actually happened, like when Trump lied about sleeping with a pornstar while his wife was pregnant bc he knew that would look bad & cost him votes in the election. There was EVIDENCE for that, despite very powerful people wanting & at first succeeding in trying to cover it up. Same here, there would be credible, named, non-recanted claims if this was actually happening. People care about their pets at least one person would be willing to name names & tame the stand if their pet was actually stolen & eaten by someone. Don't u think?
Both sides have reason tk lie about this bc if it's true it looks bad for dems (even tho they're trying to pass a stricter border bill anyway) & if it's false it looks bad for Republicans (bc they have to have scary "illegal" immigrants to claim dems are soft on the border, even tho rn they literally tried to pass a strict & bipartisan bill & the Republicans killed it). - 1 y
You just lost all credibility because you referenced that Stormy Daniels thing which was completely disproven. Her own previous lawyer said she's a liar @GOLDFISH_smile
And yes, I trust citizen journalism more than corporate journalism. Any fucking day of the week. - 1 y
@Maybe_Maybe_not corporate journalism is less reliable than going up to a random crack addict and asking them to give you the news.
- 1 y
Ok so u think there's NO evidence in that case (despite all the evidence enough to prove in literal court). But u think that evidence doesn't MATTER on this case bc u believe the people claiming it even tho they've all changed their minds & said they were wrong? Sounds like these people claiming Haitians ate their pets are just as unreliable as stormy Daniel's. So y are you believing them & not her?
- 1 y
Who IS to be trusted? Citizens? Like stormy daniels?
- 1 y
@Juxtapose okay, assuming you are not paranoid, when I say that citizen-made journalism is random, unverifiable, amateur and unsupervised, what is the part you disagree with?
- 1 y
@GOLDFISH_smile you have a false narrative. You say that literally everyone who claimed the Haitians did that changed their mind. That is not so. Stormy Daniels is a proven liar, fuck that bitch.
I trust citizens generally so long as their record is pretty good and the context of the situation supports them being truthful.
@Maybe_Maybe_not the very concept of "amateur" journalism is gatekeeping. Journalism is supposed to go straight to the hands of the citizens, not these big corporations that are in bed with the government.
It's not random.
It is verifiable, independent journalists are perfectly capable of sourcing their material. First amendment auditors in particular do a wonderful job. I don't see any corporate lap dog running any first amendment audits on cops. I wonder why? 😂
Unsupervised.. well good! Citizens are not cats or dogs that need to be supervised by an owner. - 1 y
Who has claimed it (specific claim) and not changed their mind? Give me a name. I will look it up & see if they've changed their mind since u heard about it.
- 1 y
@Juxtapose okay then I've found another point of philosophical disagreement with you, this time about the mission of journalism. Since this disagreement is about philosophy, then I will not push it further lol
- 1 y
All of them. All the names u have of people who made claims, those ones changed their mind & said they were mistaken.
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
13Opinion
- 3.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yto be fair, she probably is part black. she's a dark woman. why does she have to lie about it? i don't know? you think americans want a black female in office? no. they don't even want a white female
10 Reply According to someone hete, when Kamala does it it's not lying. She'd being sly and cunning, luring all who oppose her into a trap. Isn't that a hoot?
10 Reply27.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. She lies about everything. She was a middle class kid, she worked at McDonalds, she was raised by a neighbor because her mother was a working mother. It would be easier to list all the things that she HAS not lied about.
20 ReplyI didn't watch it, but I know the answer is that people lie about their race and ethnicity to gain favor with PoC demographics and to get preferential considerations in hiring, loans, grants, academia, etc... Nothing new.
20 Reply- 5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yJust going to leave this here.. Yeah she's a liar like most leftists.
30 Reply 5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. She lies about everything, all the time without batting an eye. This is what happens when you spend your entire life in politics.
00 Reply- 8.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yDo you have a reputable source for this? Until then...
01 Reply - 1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yTrump said his dad was born in Germany. Why did he lie?
Trump said he was on the honor roll at Wharton. Why did he lie?
14 Reply- 1 y
really? I asked a question about Trump's obvious mental decline and all Maga shouted "Biden!"
- 1 y
Otter, if you allow whataboutisms on your threads, that’s on you.
3.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Maybe she was channeling Joe. He is loaded with crap.
10 Reply- 710 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yKamala would not know the truth if it jumped up and bit her on the ass. She has not told the truth from day one why would she start now even about her grandparents?
00 Reply 1.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. It's her nature. She lies so much she can't tell what truth is any more.
00 Reply- 3.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 ySame reason she lies about everything else. Because it's convenient for her, and she thinks she can get away with it.
00 Reply - 5.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yWHO THE FREAK CARES?(Oh, I forgot;the Trump groupies !!!)
03 ReplyI'm a Canadian; I can't vote in the American election, though my mother was a Detroit, Mich. native. (I'd vote for Cornel West anyway, and anyone who'd vote for a man convicted of THIRTY-FOUR crimes, including s*xual assault, and who's a lifelong grifter, racist and general POS has no right to talk about anyone else's morals.) Look in the mirror, Juxtapose;at least I can think for myself, boyo !!!
- 1 y
"A local prosecutor magically turned a single state misdemeanor into 34 federal felonies in a state court in front of a judge with direct ties with the Biden administration, and whom also instructed the jury that they could still find the Defendant guilty even if they couldn't "find" or "identify" the crime. Stop gaslighting people with your disingenuous dangerous socialism bullshit and stop deliberately spreading disinformation."
A quote from @NYCQuestions1976 that fits you perfectly.
That's all Harris does
00 Reply
Harris double talk, did she manage to fool you?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News