So, Project 2025 wasn't the agenda?

[goaded]

“Now that the election is over I think we can finally say that yeah actually Project 2025 is the agenda. Lol,” right-wing podcast host Matt Walsh wrote.

“It is my honor to inform you all that Project 2025 was real the whole time,” Benny Johnson

“Can we admit now that we are going to implement Project 2025?” Bo French

Only 7 percent of GOP voters had positive views of Project 2025, while 33 percent held negative views.

It calls for banning abortion pills nationwide; using big tech to surveil abortion access; rolling back climate policies; enabling workplace discrimination; and worsening wealth inequality. That's what you voted for.

Updates

1 y

Aaaand, the FCC nominee wrote the FCC chapter of Project2025.

Brendan Carr, who wants to revoke NBC's broadcast licence over an SNL skit.

Updates

1 y

We're (the people of the world) are relying on Republican senators having a spine and self-interest, much like we relied on SCOTUS to not say the president is allowed to commit crimes. We're probably screwed.

[sawno]

Correct, you got trolled by Matt Walsh who owns project2025. com to promote his movie about trolling the left. Someone recently linked me a compelling video that Project2025 is an agenda, and is being offered to the trump team. Its just not THE agenda. Its a think thank result that Trump can use the parts he likes from, its not like they made actual policy verbatim.

If you want the real agenda its right here : https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47

Knowing you I bet you can find plenty of material to disagree with in Agenda47, but at least then your criticizing the real one and not conflating the think tank project with Trump's policy. They have strong overlap in places, but its not 1:1 and some policies Project2025 wants are outright not endorsed or even mentioned by Trump's policies.

[goaded]

Of course Trump doesn't mention it, it's political poison. That's also why he didn't say up front who his nominees would be.

The Heritage Foundation, who wrote Project2025, have also vetted thousands of right-winger Trump loyalists for posts in the government. You think Trump's about to do any work like that?

[sawno]

I find it unrealistic that he would rely on a single foundation for his entire platform, politics doesn't work like that. They always have a large number of people and orgs trying to influence.

[goaded]

Project2025 was written by "a large number of people and orgs". Including well over 100 of Trump's former team.

Trump will do some things by himself because he thinks he's smarter than anyone else, but he'll leave all the implementation to people like the Heritage Foundation have done the work find for him. Just like his federal judge and SCOTUS picks came from the Federalist Society.

[sawno]

I'm not saying they aren't involved and helping since someone showed me decent evidence for that. I am saying it doesn't mean its their agenda verbatim. They can only implement what they are allowed to implement. Trump still has to choose the idea.

[goaded]

Or simply let the people he hired do what they want. That costs him nothing and hurts people. Win-win, from his point of view. Has he picked Skeletor for immigration yet?

[msc545]

2025 or 47 - they are both bad.

[Juxtapose]

Germany would be a lot safer actually a skeletor was in charge of your immigration. You guys really need to clean up over there, I saw fucking foreigners who had no business being there begging and then acting pissy when I didn't give them anything. Fuck that dude.

[Juxtapose]

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47

Man, agenda 47 is fucking badass.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose "Germany would be a lot safer..." Did they have a gun? That beggar you saw that was "acting pissy when I didn't give them anything."? I'm sure there are no entitled beggars in the US.

[Juxtapose]

I have never seen anything like that in the USA before even when I was in NYC.

In Germany I would actually prefer if every single person had a gun, then it would be equalized. Guns are GOOD.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose No, they're not. That's part of the reason you have nearly eight times the murder rate. (And Germany has about 15 million firearms in civilian hands.)

What do you think? You should have shot the beggar for being rude?

[Juxtapose]

Your gun control bullshit is not going to work on me because I already know that Russia and Japan have similar gun control laws but yet the crime rate is very different. There's a reason for that. There's also a reason that for many years, Americans existed just fine with guns and we even had gun clubs in schools. What has been going wrong with America is a targeted campaign by the deep state to destabilize urban areas and increase crime. Look at what has been done to the black family in America and it was done on purpose with no fault on the black people. They are victims of the deep state.

I shot him with a insult after he insulted me.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Russia has literally been letting cannibals and paedophiles out of prison to fight in Ukraine, it's not a civilised country. Japan is. America's between the two.

America has never accepted equality between black and white people, it's systemic. Learning how to shoot is OK, learning how to shoot people is not. Again, 15 million firearms in civilian hands in Germany.

[Juxtapose]

There you go, it is the culture rather than the guns. You pretty much just admitted it.

Yes it has. We already had a black president and there is nothing of white person can do in America that a black person cannot. Look at Oprah Winfrey my man.

Are those 15 million firearms allowed to be quickly accessible so you can draw them at a moment's notice if you are in danger? Can you open or concealed carry?

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Why would you want to concealed carry? Nobody else is wandering about with a gun! People's freedom not to be killed is more important than your freedom to kill someone.

[Juxtapose]

Well if some guy and his friend want to get cute and pull knives on me, then I will have a fighting chance instead of being their plaything.

Only an insane person would argue that the government should have a monopoly on lethal force. The government will literally do shit like experiment on black people using syphilis, experiment on people using LSD without them even knowing (not that the people being experimented on using syphilis new either), people be injected with plutonium without them knowing, people will be put in internment camps because of their race during wartime, people will have their animals abducted and killed by the state, etc.

[Juxtapose]

*knew either

[Juxtapose]

[goaded]

@Juxtapose "Well if some guy and his friend want to get cute and pull knives on me, then I will have a fighting chance instead of being their plaything."
And if they had guns instead of knives? I'm not following the "logic", here.

Look up how many people get robbed of their firearms every year in the US. By definition, they were carrying a firearm at the time. Then there's the relative ease of getting firearms into criminals' hands because they're in burgled houses...

"The government will literally do shit like experiment on black people using syphilis..."
All those things happened in a country where everybody has access to guns, and they weren't stopped by people with guns, either, so what's your point, exactly?

[Juxtapose]

I would rather be in a gunfight against multiple people than in a knife fight against multiple people.

People can easily rob you with a knife as well. A gun would at least allow granny to have an equalizer and would allow someone like my very short sister to have a fighting chance.

Ha! It gets way worse when you don't have guns. All the American people need to do is be pissed off enough and the government is going to have a very hard time so they put their thumb on the scale less.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Of course say you would. But it would probably just be taken from you at gunpoint. Or even knifepoint.

Here's the thing. Real popular political movements bring out millions of unarmed people. Numbers too big to ignore and too big to intimidate, just look at Ukraine's revolution. Self-styled militia want minority rule and wouldn't last long in a confrontation with the government.

By the way, you didn't address how people having guns stopped the government from doing all those terrible things you listed.

[Juxtapose]

Literally the reason why America is not like this:



Is because of guns. That is what happened to Australia when they were disarmed.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose You still didn't address how people having guns stopped the US government from doing all those terrible things you listed.

Australia had a total of 24,414 deaths, 937 per million. If they'd done as "well" as the US, it would have been over 70,000 more.

[Juxtapose]

I already did. Look at what happened to Australia when they gave up their guns. One of the first things dictatorships do is disarm the population, you never, EVER let the government have a monopoly on lethal force. EVER EVER!

America would have done a lot better if we did not listen to Anthony Fauci. He's literally the one that fucked everything.

But you're trying to distract how the Australians lost their rights. And now look at people in Britain, being subjugated so horribly by their government.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose No, you didn't address how people having guns stopped the US government from doing all those terrible things you listed. Not at all. You're lying. Quote yourself.

You're also supporting the idea of 4 times as many Australians dying than actually did. 70,000 Aussies would probably disagree with you. Unlike the 800,000 Americans who might have lived, had their country handled it as well.

[Juxtapose]

Omfg it's like you don't listen at all.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Australia's response to Covid quartered the number of deaths compared to the US. Americans with guns prevented or stopped NOT ONE of the atrocities you attribute to the federal government. (How many of them started under Republican leadership, by the way?)

[goaded]

Which one was stopped by armed Americans? Which were started by Republican presidents?

MK Ultra: 1953 Eisenhower, Republican
Operation Northwoods: 1962. rejected by President John F. Kennedy
Operation Paperclip: 1945-1959 Taking extremely qualified German scientists, terrible!
Operation Fast and Furious: 2006-2011 Bush-Obama.
Operation Mockingbird: alleged
Tuskegee Syphilis Study: 1932-1972 Herbert Hoover, Republican
Waco: cultists, like you
Ruby Ridge: Legal
...

[Juxtapose]

You are lying to get people to give up their rights for no goddamn good reason. You should be ashamed of yourself.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose I'm not lying as anyone can see.

Which one was stopped by armed Americans? Which were started by Republican presidents?

MK Ultra: 1953 Eisenhower, Republican
Operation Northwoods: 1962. rejected by President John F. Kennedy
Operation Paperclip: 1945-1959 Taking extremely qualified German scientists, terrible!
Operation Fast and Furious: 2006-2011 Bush-Obama.
Operation Mockingbird: alleged
Tuskegee Syphilis Study: 1932-1972 Herbert Hoover, Republican
Waco: cultists, like you
Ruby Ridge: Legal
...

[Juxtapose]

Dude you are so elementary you can't even see the deterrents factor of an entire population being armed. Americans being armed has literally deterred other nations from invading us, but you wouldn't know that.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose It obviously didn't work, though, did it? Not one of those things was stopped by people with guns. Just by common decency of a Democratic president or journalism exposing them.

MK Ultra: 1953 Eisenhower, Republican
Operation Northwoods: 1962. rejected by President John F. Kennedy
Operation Paperclip: 1945-1959 Taking extremely qualified German scientists, terrible!
Operation Fast and Furious: 2006-2011 Bush-Obama.
Operation Mockingbird: alleged
Tuskegee Syphilis Study: 1932-1972 Herbert Hoover, Republican
Waco: cultists, like you
Ruby Ridge: Legal
...

[Juxtapose]

You can put any list in front of me you want but it will not change the reality that the second amendment has prevented the United States from descending to such a state as Australia where they can force you to take medicine without even showing you their credentials. If Australians had guns that would not have happened.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose It was your list of things that happened that you claim wouldn't have happened if people had guns. In the US. Where people had guns. And they happened.

"The government will literally do shit like experiment on black people using syphilis, experiment on people using LSD without them even knowing (not that the people being experimented on using syphilis new either), people be injected with plutonium without them knowing, people will be put in internment camps because of their race during wartime, people will have their animals abducted and killed by the state, etc. "

[Juxtapose]

I never claimed that lol. That was a list of why I don't trust the USA government, get a grip man.

Do you not think I realized when I made that list that the second amendment has been in full force this entire time? Get real.

[Juxtapose]

You can't judge things for shit, that's why you don't know what a woman is and why you believe the very fine people hoax.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose So, why did you give those lists of things that the US government has done when talking about "guns are GOOD"? All guns do is make life more dangerous. How many people get accidentally shot in a year? How many intentionally?

It's not hard not to list things that have nothing to do with guns in a conversation about guns.

People with guns couldn't do anything about the government doing those things, so why bring them up?

[Juxtapose]

Because guns is what has kept the USA government in check. They can only put their thumb on the scale so much and if guns were not in the equation they would go full totalitarian just like Australia did.

[Juxtapose]

And you will notice how the British are being arrested over social media posts.. and the Germans are too. But not US citizens.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose No, guns don't keep the USA government in check, laws do. Did.

[Juxtapose]

You're deluded.

[Juxtapose]

"In a 1789 letter to John Adams’ son-in-law, Williams Stephens Smith, Thomas Jefferson stated, “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” Jefferson also famously stated, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.” The Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment to protect our right to exercise violence against any force threatening our liberties, including and emphasizing the U. S. government."

amherststudent.com/.../

[goaded]

@Juxtapose In 1789, the government didn't have drones and attack helicopters. He was also wrong. The people don't need to take up arms, they just need to turn up in numbers too high to ignore or kill.

[Juxtapose]

Guns are what has stopped America from enduring the kind of tyranny Britain, Germany and Australia go through.

[Juxtapose]

Civilians should have drones and attack helicopters as well.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose There's no tyranny in any of those places, and I have family in each and every one.

[Juxtapose]

In Britain, you can literally go to prison for typing on social media: "It is okay to be white."

In Germany you cannot deny the Holocaust in front of a police officer and if two or more people testify that you have denied the Holocaust, you are in trouble. You also can get your house raided by what you post online.

In Australia you could have medical procedures done against you without your consent by people not required to show you their credentials to do so.

Yeah.. no.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose In America you can get arrested for driving away from a bank.

[Juxtapose]

America lets me have free speech and guns. Those are the rights I look for first when I am moving somewhere. All other rights are pretty much secondary.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Woo! You can shoot people if you want to, and so can your neighbours! I get to not be shot by anyone. I win.

[Juxtapose]

No, that's not actually how it works. Americans have existed with guns for hundreds of years and we have been fine. Nobody has even pointed a gun at me.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Then why did you need a gun? Did you ever point yours at anyone?

People exist with millions of guns in all those countries you mentioned. They just don't lean on them as a crutch.

[Juxtapose]

I have not needed to. But if I get surrounded by five people with baseball bats? A gun is going to be my only fighting chance besides getting away.

If my little sister who is almost the height of a midget gets accosted by someone taller than Michael Jordan and more ripped than Arnold Schwarzenegger? One of her only hopes is going to be her gun, which she does have. She's a hardcore leftist who is into the woke shit but she makes sure to stay strapped.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose And has your "little sister who is almost the height of a midget" been "accosted by someone taller than Michael Jordan and more ripped than Arnold Schwarzenegger"? No? Then maybe she only needed a gun in your fevered imagination.

[Juxtapose]

If you are not prepared then you are prepared to fail. Especially as an extremely short person you should be prepared for multiple assailants.

[Juxtapose]

Or ones that are significantly bigger than you. Rapes and whatnot can happen and the last woman I lived with was forcibly raped.

[Juxtapose]

Thankfully she found trust in me and had me walk her to work for protection.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose I don't know why she didn't just hug a gun, like you do.

Is that what it's like to be an American, to walk in fear every day of your life? What a sad existance that must be.

[Juxtapose]

Safety is an illusion and your own self-defense is your personal responsibility. If you think you should walk around not being able to defend yourself in a bad situation, you live in la la land.

Little old ladies that can barely move need some sort of equalizer if five men want to brutalize her. That's just how the world is man. Doesn't matter where you live.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose That's your world, and it's sad and delusional. I pity you.

[Danzigdawson]

https://www.youtube.com/embed/51JKSpmjSko

They'll have to get rid of Trump! 😆 (They won't, of course)

[Danzigdawson]

@Phraseology is one of those idiots who believes that "nazi is socialism" bullshit.

[Danzigdawson]

*nazism is socialism bullshit. He's blocked me too when I dared to challenge him about the lack of facts behind everything he's saying.

[goaded]

Regarding the "no convicts" part, Hitler wasn't exactly the vision of an Aryan super man, was he? Hypocrisy is their natural state.

[Danzigdawson]

@goaded Indeed! Neither was Goebbels with his small stature, deformed foot, his terminal sycophancy and his total lack of morals and responsability (not to mention his weak chin and his hate-filled, despicable personality). The rules don't apply to them, but they'll make damn sure that everyone else will follow them to a tee.

[mandyfire98]

Who is the border czar trump appointed?
What did he help co-author?
But Trump said he doesn't know them or have anything to do with the heritage foundation. Now boom, he's the border czar. Funny how that works.

It was always the plan.

[goaded]

It was obvious to anyone paying attention. It explains the spikes in searches for "Can I change my vote", "What is project 2025", etc.

[Twalli]

Trump hasn't read it. I guarantee that. Yet, we know what he didn't like white POTUS the first time, Project 2025 removes most of that, plus with the SCOTUS presidential immunity ruling combined with Project 2025, he's steps away from becoming an autocratic dictator.

[goaded]

@Twalli You're right, too long and not enough pictures.

[mandyfire98]

By the way... Here are the replies from people in the coming year. I'm freaking clairvoyant.

Project 2025 is happening

"No it's not, fake news, no it's not"

Everything on the list starts happening. "No it's not, fake news"

Over half the list has happened.
"No it's not, fake news"

The entire list happens.
"No it's not, fake news"

Social security and retirement age is pushed back. "No it's not, fake news" as they're still working years later at 75 years of age.

[Anonymous]

Yes this what we voted for. You are just going to have to suck up democracy

[WindAtMyBack]

It was the agenda during Biden also. It was the agenda during Trump before that, and Obama before that, and Bush before that, and Clinton before that. That group tries to influence EVERY president and every Congress regardless of who it is. Same with hundreds of other groups who try to influence government.

Of course they have an agenda. So what else is new? Last time I checked, those guys aren't in charge. They just try to influence whoever is in charge, regardless of their party.

[goaded]

They didn't just write a paper for Trump, they have also vetted thousands of people for loyalty to the cause in the hope that they will be placed in positions to take over the government. Do you think Trump would put in the work to vet people personally? He's far too lazy.

[goaded]

And they only write for the Repubicans, no-one else.

[WindAtMyBack]

They try to influence ALL presidents and politicians. Obviously since they are conservative, they will have more receptive ears from conservatives, even if they are moderate conservatives. But they try to influence everyone. Just like every other group tries to influence everyone.

Keep in mind that they didn't even want Trump. They tried to stop his nomination. They were pushing for Ted Cruz who is far more in line with their agenda.

[exitseven]

There is some things in Project 2025 that are good ideas. The sections on illegal immigration, education and some of the economic and foreign policy items are good ideas. It is not a blueprint for the Trump administration. It is not like this insane document that was used to destroy America and very well almost succeeded.

Microsoft Word - Press Release -- Unity Task Force Recommendations 7_8_2020. docx

[exitseven]

joebiden.com/.../...TASK-FORCE-RECOMMENDATIONS.pdf

[goaded]

I recommend anyone who thinks you might be right about something go and read the document.

[exitseven]

I read parts of it and some parts are better than others. It is not Trump's do it yourself guide.

[goaded]

I meant the one you linked to, calling it an "insane document that was used to destroy America". joebiden.com/.../...TASK-FORCE-RECOMMENDATIONS.pdf

[exitseven]

If people actually took the time to read this 4 years ago Biden would have lost in a bigger landslide than Harris did

[goaded]

Again, I ask people to read, or just skim, this document that you call an "insane document that was used to destroy America" joebiden.com/.../...TASK-FORCE-RECOMMENDATIONS.pdf

[Avicenna]

Ah, Goaded Xi continues to bitterly gaslight everyone. As if some drag-queen loving far left layabout who doesn’t even live in the US and isn’t a US citizen would be privy to what the Trump Administration’s policy planning is. Interestingly, you never had a word of complaint about the extreme policies and personnel of the Biden Administration.

But keep the conspiracy theories coming, goaded, while you get trolled and fall for it.

[Danzigdawson]

@Avicenna , my old ISIS-supporting friend! You never gave an answer on that other thread... How does it feel to be proudly Jewish and to support a man who will not condemn white supremacists or christian nationalism? Are you conflicted or cool with it? I gather that you are OK with those hitler-esque "vermin" and "poisonning the blood" quotes from Trump? Again, are you going to justify them? Claim that he's never said such things, without any kind of proof? Say it's AI deepfakes? That his words are taken out of context? How are YOU —the proud Jewish man that you say you are— going to defend the orange führer's right to use nazi-inspired rhetoric?

[Avicenna]

@Danzigdawson: I see they’re allowing you Canadian mental patients access to the internet again.

Anyway, Trump did better with Jews than any Republican candidate ever (or at least a very long time), so that tells me that we see through the leftist propaganda you and others spew.

You can rant and rave about Trump all you like but you can’t dictate to others what to think and people aren’t going to fall for your BS. Anti-Semitism
Is much stronger among leftists these days, to the point where the harassers of Jewish university students aren’t even prosecuted or even suspended. Some are even given university teaching jobs. All are leftists and/or Islamists. And then there are these Democrats in Congress that really hate Jews. Do you have the same problem with your “Liberals” in Canada?

Canada has a huge problem with ISIS members planning attacks on Jews, including across the border in the US, so don’t coddle these ISIS supporters- if you think someone is ISIS, turn them in. I do wonder if it’s a crime NOT to turn in these ISIS supporters. Would be funny if you hoisted yourself up on your own petard.

[Juxtapose]

You do realize the comments by those guys were satire, right? Nobody is pushing this boggyman.

https://youtu.be/1B8HXq63qeM?si=Zx2W3Hns2NcpHsqf

[goaded]

Sure.

[Juxtapose]

Yeah yeah cope more lol. This is desperate, even for you.

[Juxtapose]

https://youtu.be/xHQXPUBxZow?si=_ipPH_kMFwljXvKw

[goaded]

Just like nominating a child molester for AG?

[Juxtapose]

I don't really care about your whataboutisms.

[Juxtapose]

lol someone censored a comment of mine for "spamming". Coward!

[Anonymous]

I just Googled those guys and only one is a politician and it's some county level thing apparently. I don't think he has enough power to implement any of the suggestions from Project 2025. It would have to come from higher up, like with Trump or Congress.

[goaded]

Google Project2025.

[Anonymous]

While I am not against Project 2025 and would support most of it provide its done at the proper level of goverment. Appointing people to run executive branch offices who also support it doesn't mean you are implementing that policy. Implementation would require congress and the whole executive branch being on board and probably the states.

[Anonymous]

And Matt Walsh has a diaper fetish too. The fetish Ben Shapiro was ranting about. I wonder what other laws he's going to try and get pass eww.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/-0qCVowCa4g

[Still-alive]

Matt Walsh this turd here sums it up. All i can say is ‘we fucking warned you!’

[Still-alive]

Update: Yeah if i were you i would start deleting anyone intentionally posting misinformation. i been doing it with all my questions

[msc545]

We knew that all along. They kept lying about it as they do about many things.

[msc545]

Project 2025 itself may not be the agenda, but everything it says definitely is, so the distinction doesn't matter and cannot be used as an excuse unless one cannot think clearly or is simply a liar.

[lightbulb27]

Rather than live in a state of anxiety, I'll await what their policies and agendas are, and decide then. same as did for Biden.

[sawno]

Sane thing to do, especially since Trumps agenda is called Agenda47 not Project2025.

[goaded]

Did you read that Trump just selected Gaetz to be the US attorney general? ↗

[lightbulb27]

yes. I will refrain from reacting to that one... no opinion. I'd rather see more central player in that role.. but I suspect none such human exists in that pit hole of DC. If he does job well... fair... reasonable... so be it.
As I said elsewhere, there is risk to Trump. He's in effect... got full power, there is no division of power now. He is a King... the people voted him that way. Just like... ughmm... I'll shut up.
If he is a fair King, maybe were better off and a lot many were concerned about is fixed.
If he's a vindictive King... not on right and wrong but on punishment, then some peoples fears may be legit.
I favor not reacting right now. I really think about what I can control rather than what is going to control me.
I voted for him, if I was wrong, I'll take responsibility. At this point, I still like what he's doing, what he says... mainly.

[Anonymous]

y'all are dumb if you think trump is for project 2025 or that he has anything to do with it. you're also dumb if you think it can even be fully implemented. this requires overcoming significant political, legal, and practical obstacles.

[goaded]

So, everything will be just rainbows and unicorns as long as some of it doesn't get implemented?

[Opinion Owner]

sigh

[goaded]

"“The Reagan administration implemented nearly half of the ideas included in the first edition by the end of his first year in office, while the Trump administration embraced nearly 64% of the 2016 edition’s policy solutions after one year,” the Heritage Foundation said in a press release announcing Project 2025.

“In fact, at least 140 people who worked in the Trump administration had a hand in Project 2025,” a CNN review found."
www.factcheck.org/2024/09/a-guide-to-project-2025/

They literally have training videos on how to avoid paper trails. Why would you do that unless it's to avoid accountability?

[WatchedPot]

They can't tell the truth. It was transparent all along. Only the brainwashed followers believe them. And now they are sidestepping "Wait a min... this is what I votes for?"

[Anonymous]

It's kinda like "we have to pass the bill to see what's IN the bill!" lol!

[goaded]

"We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."

" Imagine an economy where people could follow their aspirations, where they could be entrepreneurial, where they could take risks professionally because personally their families [sic] health care needs are being met. Where they could be self-employed or start a business, not be job-locked in a job because they have health care there, and if they went out on their own it would be unaffordable to them, but especially true, if someone has a child with a pre-existing condition. So when we pass our bill, never again will people be denied coverage because they have a pre-existing condition.

We have to do this in partnership, and I wanted to bring [you] up to date on where we see it from here. The final health care legislation that will soon be passed by Congress will deliver successful reform at the local level. It will offer paid for investments that will improve health care services and coverage for millions more Americans. It will make significant investments in innovation, prevention, wellness and offer robust support for public health infrastructure. It will dramatically expand investments into community health centers. That means a dramatic expansion in the number of patients community health centers can see and ultimately healthier communities. Our bill will significantly reduce uncompensated care for hospitals.

You’ve heard about the controversies within the bill, the process about the bill, one or the other. But I don’t know if you have heard that it is legislation for the future, not just about health care for America, but about a healthier America, where preventive care is not something that you have to pay a deductible for or out of pocket. Prevention, prevention, prevention–it’s about diet, not diabetes. It’s going to be very, very exciting.

But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy."

[DryGermanGuy]

Well, I am shocked! „Lol“, indeed! 🙄

[OddBeMe]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TnkJ8_BmSI

[onedarkcloud]

Project 2025 was written so THE DEMOCRATIC COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA could blame Trump for it. The left keeps shouting WOLF.

[goaded]

It was written by Trump staffers.

[onedarkcloud]

Kamala staffers Oh I am sorry Obamas people

[goaded]

Your lies are pathetic. Your trolling is worse.

[onedarkcloud]

Yeah I guess so but not as bad as your DEMOCRATIC COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA trolls like you and Goldberg

[onedarkcloud]

I see that the truth hurts, but you will keep on denying the truth like all good Democrats. As for trolling, I guess that you have not looked in the mirror lately. If you did you would see the chief troll looking back at you!

[Dargil]

If its true, its headed our way especially some parts of it.

[grega239]

Never looked into it but from what I've heard, its bs

[goaded]

How do you mean? That it's a terrible plan, or that you don't think Trump's going to implement it?

"A key ally to former President Donald Trump detailed plans to deploy the military in response to domestic unrest, defund the Environmental Protection Agency and put career civil servants “in trauma” in a series of previously unreported speeches that provide a sweeping vision for a second Trump term.

In private speeches delivered in 2023 and 2024, Russell Vought, who served as Trump’s director of the Office of Management and Budget, described his work crafting legal justifications so that military leaders or government lawyers would not stop Trump’s executive actions.

He said the plans are a response to a “Marxist takeover” of the country; likened the moment to 1776 and 1860, when the country was at war or on the brink of it; and said the timing of Trump’s candidacy was a “gift of God.”

“Their Entire Apparatus Is Exposed to Our Strategy”"
www.propublica.org/.../video-donald-trump-russ-vought-center-renewing-america-maga

[Staximus]

Keep sucking up that libtard demo rat propaganda

[goaded]

Thank you for your well considered and thoughtful response.

[Staximus]

You believe everything you hear from the media is absolute truth? Do you question anything?

[goaded]

No. Why do people like you assume that someone who disagrees with them must believe everything in the media? Apart from anything else, that would include believing Fox News and other right wing propaganda channels.

You clearly believe nonsense.

[Staximus]

https://youtu.be/WuRvBVmGvYI

[Anonymous]

Do they apologize to all their brainwashed voters now too? Do they get their votes back?

[beefcakebradybatson]

Trump's waiting for the appropriate time to spring Project 2025 on the U. S.

[Anonymous]

Most of it was stolen from your plan 2030 I mean we left out the wealth confiscations

[NewWaves]

It's a troll 😆

[goaded]

That doesn't mean it's not true.

[NewWaves]

I suppose let's wait and see

[goaded]

It might be too late, then. Hitler managed to convince parliament to give him the power to make laws independent of them; just four months later all other parties had been made illegal and elections suspended forever.

Trump wanted the Senate to abdicate their constitutional authority to advise and consent to presidential nominations. Would that have been much less?

[noohair]

Not my agenda..