Who stands the best chance of actually serving in the role for which President-elect Trump has nominated them?

[DrPepper12]

Pete Hegseth - DefSec

RFK JR - Health human services

Tulsi Gabbard - DNI

Matt Gaetz - AG

Updates

1 y

WOW!!! RFK? REALLY? My money is on Tulsi

[BCA6010]

The defense spending lobby hates Pete Hegseth, so I think that's the one you're most likely to see "unexpected" opposition to.

RFK likewise has a lot of enemies from the pharma lobby, but is probably less likely to face serious opposition with the appointment due to having a range of bipartisan support.

Matt Gaetz is easily the one that the swamp itself is most afraid of, with good reason. He's also arguably the single most important one to get approved in the short term.

Tulsi will have the easiest time getting approved because the opposition will be performative nonsense while she enjoys broad support.

[DrPepper12]

Great informed answer!! TY

[Anonymous]

RFK Jr which will be awesome that America will finally be healthy again.

Jillian did a good take on RFK Jr being selected.

https://x.com/JillianMichaels/status/1857461093310046353

[DrPepper12]

No...

[Opinion Owner]

Yes, RFK Jr has good ideas for making America healthy again such as getting chemicals that are banned in other countries out of our food. If you're worried about RFK Jr taking vaccines away? That's just a paranoid conspiracy theory, he isn't taking vaccines away, what he is doing is is making sure vaccines goes through the same safety testing as other drugs and manufacturers will no longer be immune to liability which is a good thing as big pharma will less likely put profits over safety which is what they do know.

[Kayleigh2005]

Fox News - all of them through recess appointments!

But, what's the 10 day rule?

[DrPepper12]

Be careful what you wish for...

[Kayleigh2005]

Really the country voted, u should focus on rebuilding ur party first

[KrakenAttackin]

With the absolute idiots Biden instilled, I don't want to hear a word from liberals about Trump's picks.

[DrPepper12]

They're universally dangerous and unqualified.

[Anonymous]

Matt Gaetz easily

he pisses off liberals and neocons the most

[DrPepper12]

Becuz he's trying to avoid indictments like his boss on TOP of being unqualified and subject to manipulation. He was chosen for his fluffing ability to protect Trump's crime spree

[Opinion Owner]

or they're afraid he'll expose them for their false indictments and blatant weaponizing of the DOJ

[blueonblack22]

I like all the choices except Matt Gaetz.

[DrPepper12]

I'll buy that but why Tulsi & RFK?

[blueonblack22]

Tulsi was targeted as a “domestic terrorist” which absolutely insane. She’s a veteran and former democrat. She knows how it feels to have her country betray for partisan deep state bs. She can clean out the NSA and other deep state agencies of bad actors. And again given she’s a former democrat it’s not she’s going to order the deep state to go in the other direction.

RFK can be a bit nutty on some issues. Namely his belief that vaccines cause autism. But he isn’t wrong about chemical additives in our food. They are outlawed in Canada and Europe. But why is that fine here?

[Jennz6]

He will be the best Defense Secretary

[Kayleigh2005]

Hot 🔥 too

[DrPepper12]

You're joking right?

[DrPepper12]

@Kayleigh2005 Agreed there but I don't like so many tattoos

[Kayleigh2005]

🤣🤣🤣

[robocop666]

I want RFK to look into vaccines.

[DrPepper12]

They're safe. Next?

[robocop666]

They are so dangerous they need special indemnity laws to protect them. Name any other product that has this? no company would dare enter the market without these laws.

[DrPepper12]

They're so dangerous they need special indemnity laws to protect them. Name any other product that has this? No company would dare enter the market without these laws.

Easy answer: Guns. Next?

by the way, they're still safe & efficacious.

[robocop666]

they paid out $5,000,000,000+ in the USA for illnesses like autism, epilepsy and narcolepsy and thats why special indemnity laws. They pay out money on a regular basis and this is what the laws are for. We had vaccines for 90 years and nobody went near them without the indemnity laws. We eradicated smallpox and polio without them.

Would you trust a product so dangerous that it needs special indemnity laws? Also would you give them to your kids with that level of danger?

[DrPepper12]

$5B? Lol I'm sure you have a source for that.

I guess I'm in favor of injuring kids because every U. S. state requires vaccinations for children to attend school from kindergarten through 12th grade. These requirements typically include vaccines for diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTaP), measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), polio, and varicella (chickenpox). While specific vaccine requirements can vary by state, all states have mandatory immunization laws for school attendance

[robocop666]

its against most forms of international law to enforce a person to undergo a medical procedure against their will. Yes I have the source its updated regularly as there is so many lawsuits. They are so dangerous that no doctor would prescribe them without indemnity laws and no company would dare enter the market for 90 years till these laws were made. See the link below its updated regularly and yes they have paid out compensation for autism and epilepsy.

https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/data

[Dongie]

RFK, Jr.

[Anonymous]

All of them.

[DrPepper12]

You really think Senate will bend over for all of them? It's like a perverse Trump loyalty test tbh.

[Opinion Owner]

[DrPepper12]

WINNER!!! 🏆✌🏻

[seeyounexttuesday]

All of them.