What do the GOP have to hide?

[OddBeMe]

Cough... he's a pedo

[lightbulb27]

Those in office are not favorable to him and still dropped the charges. I'm sure he isn't a saint and there's plenty of skeletons in the closet... he will never be pope. But ya can't ruin someones life over accusations.

[goaded]

You can decide that they're not right for some of the highest, most powerful, posts in the land based on credible accusations, though.

[msc545]

@goaded @ᗰIᑎᑕᕼᗩᑎ think this guy is a piece of shit, but unsupported accusations are just vicious gossip.

[goaded]

@msc545 Apart from the documented payments.

[msc545]

@goaded I am unsure that the payments alone constitute a problem. Paying someone is not illegal.

[goaded]

@msc545 Payment to young women, including a 17 year old, for what? The opportunity to enjoy their conversation? Get real.

[msc545]

@goaded That is admittedly suggestive, but not conclusive. Maybe it was gifts.

[goaded]

@msc545 How many gifts have you sent to teenage girls that aren't family members?

[OddBeMe]

The fact that he sent payments to a known sex worker would be enough evidence for any reg citizen. They freakin scan offenders computers for what posted publicly on venmo. Lol

[msc545]

Apparently quite a few sex crimes.

[Anonymous]

Something they know would turn the Senate against voting for him or they'd release it.

[Anonymous]

History shows that the Democrats don't needs evidence to find you guilty

[OddBeMe]

Checking... nope there was always evidence

[Opinion Owner]

Basically some chick comes forward from the past claiming you raped her. I could do that ti any of my previous lovers.

[Kingofkings1992]

@OddBeMe yeah, checking your completely unbiased sources, right?

[OddBeMe]

Trump wasn't convicted of rape. He was convicted of business fraud. 34 felonies

[Kingofkings1992]

Yet he still beat Harris in an absolute landslide 🤔

[Opinion Owner]

Exactly 34 coubts of nothing which was a major factor in his reelection

[OddBeMe]

Sure Republicans love law breaking billionaires. And pedo congressman

[goaded]

@Kingofkings1992 Less than 50% of the vote, less than a 1.7% margin over second place, and low 300's in the electoral college is not "an absolute landslide".

For comparison, Reagan got nearly 10% margin over Carter and 489 to 49 in the EC. That was a landslide.

[DrPepper12]

But tell me again who's running an international trafficking ring with pizza eating satanic cabals...

Dems clean house, MAGA elects them to the House

[OddBeMe]

Boom yes.

[Anonymous]

After a three year investigation the FBI declined to prosecute. Citing it was a false accusation. So, I imagine the only stuff in his ethics report is the frat boy behavior he exhibited after getting elected and before getting married. Nothing to be proud of; but since it has ceased, nothing to limit his, or anyone else's, career prospects.

[goaded]

I've seen someone on here cut and pasting that exact same text. "After a three year investigation the FBI declined to prosecute. Citing it was a false accusation."

Total lie, that second sentence.

[OddBeMe]

Yeah it wasn't. Like Kavanaugh, it's just as protecting people in the system.

[goaded]

The Trump White House buried all the messages from the tip line for Kavanaugh. Hid them from the FBI.

[OddBeMe]

@goaded and fbi freely admitted it did a half ass job

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe @goaded The both of you are half-ass jobs.

[Opinion Owner]

@goaded maybe they were "cut and pasting" the same thing because that is what happened.

@OddBeMe you mean the rape that didn't happen because he wasn't there?

@goaded I could be wrong, but wasn't it the DNC that set up the tip line?

@OddBeMe if it isn't entrapment, the FBI isn't interested.

@NYCQuestions1976 no need to stoop to their level.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Opinion Owner Okay fair enough. Carry on.

[goaded]

1. At no point did anyone, not the FBI, not even Gaetz's lawyers afaics, say that the accusations were false, just that the DoJ had "determined not to bring any charges against him". If the charges were false, the accusers would have committed a crime; no charges were brought there, either.

That is why I called the claim a lie. I did not call you a liar.

2. It was the FBI tip line. 4,500 reports memory holed by the White House.

"Washington, DC – In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, U. S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) today received confirmation from FBI Director Christopher Wray that the FBI sent tips that the agency had collected about Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the Trump White House without investigation. The tips were collected through the FBI’s existing tip line as part of a supplemental background investigation after allegations of sexual misconduct emerged during Justice Kavanaugh’s 2018 confirmation process. Wray also confirmed that the Trump White House directed which witnesses the FBI was permitted to interview.

... By the FBI’s own account, it merely “provided all relevant tips” to Trump’s Office of White House Counsel, the very office that had constrained and directed the limited investigation."
www.whitehouse.senate.gov/.../

[OddBeMe]

OP: whatever goad says... you guys are brainwashed

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe @goaded It's you leftists that engage in gaslighting and disinformation. Dingleberries.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 You guys regurgitate every false thing outta trunps mouth. Pet eating Haitians and today the 13000 killed by wandering migrants. Lol

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Protected geese and ducks in public parks were being eaten by illegal Haitian immigrants. So that was an exaggeration at best. You're grasping at straws. You socialist turds got a foot up your ass named REALITY on Election Day. Deal with it with less drinking and more therapy.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 No, they weren't. That's a lie, too.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Bullshit. The only liars here are you and Drinky. Basement Biden and Cacklin' Word Salad Harris deliberately circumvented the law and brought in illegal immigrants from Haiti on fabricated asylum claims. If their circumstances were so dire, why didn't they just cross their border seek asylum in the Dominican Republic? Oh yeah that's right. The Dominican Republic doesn't want illegal immigrants either.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 No, you're definitely the one speading lies here.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're constantly, continually, consistently, and continuously full of dangerous gaslighting socialism disinformation bullshit.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 And you're always truthful and calm.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Truthful? Yes. Calm? Certainly. Your foaming at the mouth delusional socialism based stupidity, albeit extremely dangerous, is hilariously entertaining.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 You're as accurate as ever.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Yes. Just like how I predicted that the Supreme Court would rule 9-0 against removing Trump from ballots, just like I predicted that Trump would win the election, and it probably wouldn't be close, and so on, and so forth. Those are just two of NUMEROUS examples of times where you were so blatantly and stupendously wrong, it becomes necessary to actually pronounce the "w" in wrong when describing your wrongness.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 That one you got right, but they didn't all vote that way for the same reasons, especially not the reasons you think. It was impractical, that's all.

The election WAS close, you fool! 1.7% margin is nothing. There have only been 3 elections closer in the last century. Reagan got 489 EC votes to Carter's 49, with a 10% margin over him in the popular vote. That's a landslide. Trump got in the low 300s, that's a typical close win. You're just going to keep repeating the lie until everybody gets sick of correcting you, aren't you?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're absolutely delusional. Trump swept all 7 of the swing states, was competitive in New Hampshire, New Jersey, Virginia, Minnesota, and New Mexico (even MSNBC didn't call New Jersey for Harris until the polls were closing on the west coast), and only California trended more left in the election, where Harris got over 12.3% of her national popular vote. Every single one of the other 49 states trended more right. Whether you like it or not, Trump's win was a NATIONAL LANDSLIDE.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded "ThAt'S lAnD! tHaT's NoT pEoPlE!"

Hypocritical ironic idiot.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 It's almost every state, moron. 489 EC votes to 49.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Reagan blew out Carter in an election that was never predicted or expected to be close in the first place. Trump blew out Harris nationwide (sans California) in an election that was expected and predicted by "experts" to not only be close, but some morons were actually expecting a Harris landslide. Hilarious!

In what was supposedly going to be a toss-up election slightly favoring Harris, Trump swept all 7 of the swing states, was competitive in New Hampshire, New Jersey, Virginia, Minnesota, and New Mexico (even MSNBC didn't call New Jersey for Harris until the polls were closing on the west coast), and only California trended more left in the election, where Harris got over 12.3% of her national popular vote. Every single one of the other 49 states trended more right. Whether you like it or not, Trump's win was a NATIONAL LANDSLIDE.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Again: smaller popular vote margin than 22 of the last 25 presidential elections. Fairly normal EC win. Polls said it was a toss-up throughout. YOU EVEN ADMIT THAT: "... what was supposedly going to be a toss-up election slightly favoring Harris"!

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded I pointed out the "experts" stupidity. That's not an admission of anything. I stated ad nauseum all over this site that Trump was going to win, and that it probably wasn't going to be close; I stated ad nauseum to monitor the betting markets and money lines; and I stated ad nauseum to watch New Jersey on Election night. All of those predictions/observations turned out to be accurate/true.

Again, with even more details:

In what was supposedly going to be a toss-up election slightly favoring Harris (according to "experts" and the left-leaning mainstream media), Trump swept all 7 of the swing states, won 24 additional states (all 24 of them CONVINCINGLY), was competitive in 6 MORE states (Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey*, Virginia, Minnesota, and New Mexico), and only California trended more left in the election, where Harris got over 12.3% of her national popular vote. Every single one of the other 49 states trended more right. Whether you like it or not, Trump's win was a NATIONAL LANDSLIDE.

*Even MSNBC didn't call New Jersey for Harris until the polls were closing on the west coast.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Once again, get a load of the socialist Balloon Head @goaded on this thread. 😂😂😂

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 yeah haha he wants to diminish this huge win but we Americans understand what Trump overcame.

If there was voter ID nationally, I think she would have only won California.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Out of the 19 states Harris won, she only convincing won 13 of them (and still performed worse than Biden in just about all of them), and was 0 for 7 in the swing states. You've got to be clinically insane to believe that the election was close. California was her only election bright spot.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose @NYCQuestions1976 You guys are a comedy duo. A 1.7% margin is tiny. More people voted against Trump than for him. The House majority will be the smallest since Hawaii joined the Union. Amd Gaetz just quit.

files.mastodon.online/.../3c0b13544b7b59e0.jpg

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Boy @goaded sure is very obsessed over tiny shrinking things. 😂

@goaded Gaetz's district is like 99% Republican, and he's going to be Florida's senator now. Over 80 million people who voted for President in the election voted for a REGIME CHANGE.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 you're still being a racist fuck at least. Your friends are hiding it.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Less drinking, more therapy.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 I'm not the idiot who thinks black people eat ducks.

[goaded]

Everybody eats ducks, they're delicious. The point is that his new (incorrect) story is to make up for the obvious lies about pets being eaten.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Why didn't the Haitians just cross the border and illegally immigrate into the Dominican Republic? Oh yeah that's right. The Dominican Republic doesn't want illegal immigrants either.

Less drinking, more therapy.

@goaded Go lie somewhere else, Sociopath Socialist.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 because biden saved their lives by granting them refugee status. And DR ain't doing much better.

Your racism is getting quite loud. I mean I get it, you won with racism... but take a break.

[Juxtapose]

What a ridiculous claim. You claim racism so frivolously.

[OddBeMe]

@Juxtapose yes when you pick out black immigrants... thats racist.

[Juxtapose]

That's not on purpose.

[OddBeMe]

@Juxtapose so where are the white immigrants eating pets? You voted for the guy who kept a racist lie going to win. Congrats rscist.

[Juxtapose]

What "white country" has cannibal tribes?

[goaded]

@Juxtapose I bet you think New Guinea cannibals used to eat their enemies.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded @OddBeMe It's the two of you that are the racists. Illegal immigrants don't belong here, and their shade of skin is completely irrelevant to that fact. Only you sniveling leftists bring up racism and skin color in conversations, and you do it whenever you're blatantly wrong and your arguments are patently false.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Do you know what DARVO means? ↗

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Go fuck yourself. You're a very dangerous narcissistic individual. You lose arguments, and then cry whatever identity politics/faux victim act topic you need to in an attempt to save face.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 DARVO. Look it up.

When they're rounding up (mostly) illegal immigrants, do you think the raids will be in poor areas or silicon valley? What do you think an illegal immigrant "looks like"?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're a paranoid lunatic, along with being a dangerous narcissistic socialist. 😂😂😂

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 You could try simply answerinf the question: When they're rounding up (mostly) illegal immigrants, do you think the raids will be in poor areas or silicon valley? What do you think an illegal immigrant "looks like"?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Hey check out @goaded 's latest paranoia. Did you know the Trump is going to round up Silicon Valley? Amazing! 😂😂😂😂😂

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Sorry I read that too fast. My bad. It's still another one of his stupid post though.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 So you can admit mistakes! Keep it up.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 he's just trying to scare people and undermine Trump but it's not going to make a difference. Trump is going to do what he's going to do and people will see how wildly successful it is.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Unfortunately, our dingleberry friend @goaded doesn't seem to understand that if you're going to look for illegal immigrants, all you need to do is go to all of the illegal immigrant shelters that popped up like warm yeast during the Basement Biden administration. Also, nearly 2 out of 3 citizens in the United States currently support mass deportation of illegal immigrants.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 "About 54 percent of respondents" is not "nearly 2 out of 3".

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 and they prop up a candidate that can literally only win in states without voter ID and they got no votes in the primary that should have decided that actual candidate. That really tells you something.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded From June:

https://youtu.be/4stmyYHr4C8?si=R_47T9nmUazODChG

62% is nearly 2 out of 3. Learn how percentages work. Also, the end of the video aged perfectly.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Not just that, but of the states that Harris did win, she still greatly underperformed in 6 of them and only overperformed in California.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded So... you're pointing out another poll that still shows very strong support for deportation of illegal immigrants, and doesn't help you out at all.

Another recent poll shows that to this point, 59% of people approve of Trump's appointees and transition team. Do you now want to post a different poll that basically shows the same results, but with just a slightly less percentage again?

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Only if you actually link to that poll. I don't believe you.

[goaded]

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded www.cbsnews.com/.../

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 www.axios.com/.../trump-transition-cabinet-approval-rating-poll

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded That a different source about the same thing. You're being pointless and redundant.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Also the image you posted doesn't help you either.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Really? Because it shows there's little enthusiasm for deporting most immigrants, much as you'd like to pretend most Americans are as heartless as Trump supporters.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded No, look at the two bottom lines compared to the other seven lines. It clearly shows that the vast majority of citizens in the United States understand the difference between ILLEGAL immigration and LEGAL immigration (of which you continue to deliberately blur lines in an effort to spread propaganda and disinformation), and understand the difference between a few people with expired paperwork slipping through the cracks here and there every year and dangerously wide-open unchecked borders thanks to Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 They're ALL illegal immigrants, idiot. That's the point.

[Juxtapose]

Deport ALL criminal aliens, starting with the hardcore criminals. MS13 vs the USA military won't go well for MS13 xD

I don't care what the sob stories of criminal aliens are. They are here illegally and that can't be tolerated or my society will be overwhelmed by them because every inch will be taken a mile by the insane Democrats who deeply wish to flood America with criminal aliens. If they do that, they can inflate their Senate seats & through military service or other loopholes, get them to be citizens. And as an added bonus, foreigners in your military are more willing to commit brutalities upon your citizenry so you can be more of a tyrant ruler.

And these illegal crossings are fueling human trafficking. Sex trafficking. This shit is really bad and we need a very strong border to secure against this.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Oh, you want American cities to look like Gaza. What could possibly go wrong?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Lines 1 through 6: No one important and/or intelligent cares. Regardless of made-up excuse, they're ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!

Line 7: "... overstayed their visa..."

Again, the two bottom lines (8 and 9) increased because of Biden: Approximately 70% for both say "DEPORT!", and rightfully so.

Also, the source "Data For Progress" is liberal propaganda.

IMMIGRATE TO THE UNITED STATES LEGALLY, OR DON'T COME HERE!

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Thank you for confirming that your position is that every undocumented immigrant should be deported, no matter if 60%+ of the country disagrees with you in many cases. I expect you'll be leading the charge for Musk to be denationalised for lying on his immigration papers.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Undocumented? Stop gaslighting people with your disingenuous dangerous socialism bullshit disinformation. The proper, non-agenda, non-propaganda terms are ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION and ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.

The last two lines greatly outnumber the other seven lines, thanks to Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris.

Why don't these illegal immigrants ever illegally immigrate into other countries (other than using those other countries as travel conduits) in the Western Hemisphere, like they do with the United States, and to a lesser extent, Canada? Oh yeah that's right! Other countries in the Western Hemisphere don't want illegal immigrants either.

A strong majority of citizens in the United States support mass deportation of illegal immigrants. PERIOD. Come to the United States via LEGAL immigration, or DON'T COME HERE.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 No, what the poll shows is that most people aren't assholes like you and Trump and think certain categories of people, whatever you want to call them, shouldn't be deported (especially as there's nowhere to deport them to).

"Why don't these illegal immigrants ever illegally immigrate into other countries"#
Because the USA is #1!

A strong majority of citizens in the United States support mass deportation of SOME illegal immigrants, not all.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded No, your propaganda backfired and shows exactly what I stated.

"(especially as there's nowhere to deport them to)"

WRONG! The illegal immigrants go back back to their country of origin. If I illegally immigrated to Canada, the United States can't say "No!" to Canada deporting me back to the United States. The same is true for every other illegal immigrant from every other country.

The number of illegal immigrants from lines 8 and 9 greatly outnumber all of the illegal immigrants from lines 1 through 6 (thanks to Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris), and a strong majority of citizens of the United States (more than 2 out of 3, according to YOUR propaganda) support mass deportation of ALL of those illegal immigrants from lines 8 and 9.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 How can you tell what country someone comes from? If I got rid of every means of identification and told Morocco's border police I was American, would America let me in? You are so stupid!

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 just an aside.. why are you so mad at illegal migrants? Lots of people here break the law (like the next pres)

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded That's what Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris have been doing! Violating federal law by letting illegal immigrants in with no means of identification! You are so stupid!

There are plenty of ways to scientifically/medically identify a person, Dingleberry.

If you lie about who you are and/or where you're from as an illegal immigrant, then you go to jail. Problem solved.

@OddBeMe Only citizens of the United States and legal immigrants belong in the United States.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 thats not an answer. WHY are you so passionate about illegal migrants instead of say speedsers or road rage?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe The United States has plenty of citizens in need who are born here, naturalized, and who immigrated here legally that are being pushed aside for illegal immigrants. It's completely unacceptable.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 "Pushed aside for illegals". How so... and please prove that.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Any and all time, resources, and taxpayer dollars spent on illegal immigrants is time, resources, and taxpayer dollars not being spent on poor people who were born here, legal immigrants, homeless veterans, citizens with ongoing mental health issues, and natural disaster victims. That's completely unacceptable.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 As if Republicans would allocate money to that!

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Oh good. The subject changer is here.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 If the cap fits. Feel free to prove your claim: "Pushed aside for illegals". How?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded I already did. Absolutely NO allocation of time, resources, and taxpayer dollars for illegal immigrants. 0%. ZERO PERCENT. You just don't like the answer. That's a YOU problem, and luckily, no one important and/or intelligent cares about what YOU want and/or believe. Either immigrate to the United States LEGALLY, or DON'T COME HERE!

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 That isn't an answer to the question.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded It's not only 100% an answer, it's also 100% the CORRECT answer.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Your claim: "The United States has plenty of citizens in need who are born here, naturalized, and who immigrated here legally that are being pushed aside for illegal immigrants.", the question: "How so... and please prove that.", your "answer" doesn't explain how anybody's being "pushed aside for illegal immigrants".

But you don't admit mistakes or correct yourself (except that once).

Just for fun: how do you spend "zero taxpayer dollars for illegal immigrants" and still have a border patrol?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Any time, resources, and taxpayer dollars being spent to benefit illegal immigrants illegally within the borders of the United States aren't being spent on citizens in need who are born here, naturalized, and who immigrated here legally, Dumbass. Also, Border Patrol agents aren't illegal immigrants.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Which explains my earlier response: do you think Republicans would spend that money on poor citizens?

Do you want the border patrol to kill immigrants on sight? Using a knife, of course, because bullets cost money. Or should the government not spend any money on detaining them?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're being ridiculous. Forging quality knives also costs money.

Don't try to come to the United States illegally. That completely solves the problem.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 You're the one pretending saying "the problem should go away" is a solution to any problem.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded That IS the solution. Don't try to illegally immigrate into the United States.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Great! Let's solve all problems like that! Don't murder! Don't rape! Don't steal! Don't cut down rainforests! Don't burn fossil fuels!

All done and dusted. That was easy!

Fool.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Translation: "We can't fix all issues, so we should fix no issues." Well done. 😂

You're such a dramatic idiot. Only a socialist deals in absolutes.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 You: "Only a socialist deals in absolutes."

Also you: "Absolutely NO allocation of time, resources, and taxpayer dollars for illegal immigrants. 0%. ZERO PERCENT."

And: "It's not only 100% an answer, it's also 100% the CORRECT answer."

You're a joke.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded If there are 0% of illegal immigrants here, then that's 0% of time, resources, and taxpayer dollars being spent to benefit illegal immigrants. Don't blame me for your stupidity.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 You think just saying "don't come to America" will solve the problem. That's stupid.

But I'm glad you're embracing socialism!

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded No, it's "Don't illegally immigrate to the United States." Nice attempt at trying to blur the lines again between illegal and legal immigration.

If you don't like it, here's what you can do. Go claim that piece of unclaimed land in the Sahara Desert between Egypt and Sudan, start your own country, and then you can have all the illegal immigrants you want living off you tax dollars.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 And as I said, that's as sure to solve the problem as "don't murder", or "don't rape"... I've said nothing to "blur the lines... between illegal and legal immigration", that's just your fantasy of what I'm saying.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded No, it's your history of exactly what you're posting. Deliberately not distinguishing between illegal immigration and legal immigration.

As I mentioned previously, go claim that piece of unclaimed land in the Sahara Desert between Egypt and Sudan, start your own country, and then you can have all the illegal immigrants you want living off your tax dollars.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 I've not said a thing about that, as anyone can see. Of course you're just lying about what I said to distract from your laughable "solution" which is to magically wish the problems away. Your "Don't illegally immigrate to the United States." is as sure to solve the problem as "don't murder", or "don't rape" does.

The closest I've come is the poll about what classes of undocumented immigrants (you'd call them all illegal immigrants) people think should be deported which shows support for your position drops off a cliff for a large proportion of them.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded I call them illegal immigrants because they ARE illegal immigrants. All you leftists trying to rebrand them as something else in an attempt to gaslight people doesn't change that reality.

Not illegally immigrating to the United States is most certainly the solution, along with actually enforcing the border and the mass deportation of illegal immigrants, which a strong majority of citizens of the United States support.

You falsely assume that lines 1 through 6 outnumber lines 8 and 9. Thanks to four miserable years Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris, that's not the case.

As I mentioned previously, if you don't like making illegal immigrants rightfully go bye-bye and also rightfully keeping them out, go claim that piece of unclaimed land in the Sahara Desert between Egypt and Sudan, start your own country, and then you can have all the illegal immigrants you want living off your tax dollars.

Proper border enforcement and mass deportations of illegal immigrants can't start soon enough.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 OMG, I should know by now how dense you can be when you need to be. You're the one who's saying they should all be treated the same, which is often the minority opinion. (And I challenge you to quote anywhere I said "lines 1 through 6 outnumber lines 8 and 9", once again you're making stuff up.)

Then there's your "solution" people should simply stop committing crimes (because you say so) and that if people didn't commit crimes there wouldn't be any crime. That's simply ridiculous.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded "... which shows support for your position drops off a cliff for a LARGE proportion of them."

Wrong. A "large proportion" of illegal immigrants fall in the category of lines 8 and 9 (thanks to four miserable years of Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris), and not lines 1 through 6. Approximately 70% of citizens of the United States want the Illegal immigrants in lines 8 and 9 GONE according to YOUR propaganda, and that's finally going to start happening very soon.

If you don't like making illegal immigrants rightfully go bye-bye and also rightfully keeping them out, go claim that piece of unclaimed land in the Sahara Desert between Egypt and Sudan, start your own country, and then you can have all the illegal immigrants you want living off your tax dollars.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Proving you don't understand the difference between a "large proportion" and a majority. A majority of those same Americans DON'T want people with roots in the community gone, but you don't care about that, you want them all gone, because you're an extremist.

And, according to you ("Only a socialist deals in absolutes.") a socialist.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're backpedaling and playing semantics because you're wrong as usual. Illegal immigrants have roots in communities the same way weeds have roots on a lawn. Time for a weed removal, and many Hispanic citizens of the United States agree:

https://youtu.be/1MyUqxS5B1M?si=XP3fAIZIbtKTchyg

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 "Any and all time, resources, and taxpayer dollars spent on illegal immigrants is time, resources, and taxpayer dollars"

Prove it. Only funds are for enforcement. They work without benefits and pay sales tax.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe So illegal immigrant shelters aren't funded with taxpayers' dollars? They don't take time, money, and resources away from other areas of need? You're full of shit.

Less drinking, more therapy. The weeds are getting pulled soon.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 in very disparate charity fundings. I'm tired of being the googler for all you fucks. I know I posted a link before showing the little fed money going to humanitarian resources. Which does help illegals. But that's it.

No snap, ebt, or housing. No Medicaid. If they're living in low cost housing the govt subsidized it's again humanitarian not funding illegals

And the tax they pay to survive certainly covers that

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe There are currently numerous illegal immigrant shelters in New York City alone. They're all over the country in metropolitan areas right now. Are they all funded with rainbows and unicorns? No, they're all funded with TAXPAYER DOLLARS. So fuck off with your nonsense. The mass deportations are starting soon enough.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 please prove that claim. I just googled NY immigrant shelters and charities popped up. Again fed money is given several ways to charities but it's a teaspoon

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Prove what, exactly? That government programs for illegal immigrants are funded with federal, state, and local taxpayers dollars? All you leftists are insanely delusional. You think all of your stupid, community-crippling ideas are just funded with unicorn farts. You're also outright lying. I Googled "illegal immigrant shelters" and all sorts of links came up describing how New York City is currently using around 25% of hotels in the city as shelters for tens of thousands of illegal immigrants.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 "You're backpedaling and playing semantics"? No, you're lying about what I say, and about who's "Deliberately not distinguishing between illegal immigration and legal immigration." - if you're being put up in a hotel, you're a documented asylum seeker or have temporary protected status, both of which are LEGAL immigrant status. MOST people disagree with you on many categories of undocumented immigrants, most also agree with deporting recent arrivals.

Your "solution": "don't illegally immigrate" is ridiculously stupid. I mean, really really stupid. And you must know it. But you're an extremist who believes in absolutes, which is why you lie so much and project yourself onto others "Only a socialist deals in absolutes."

Real solutions involve things like appointing more judges to deal with the claims more quickly (which was in the bipartisan deal Trump had killed) and diplomatic solutions to get Mexico to dissuade people from crossing the US border without violating their human rights (organised by Biden and leading to low numbers of crossings right now).

[Juxtapose]

@goaded remain in Mexico was a superior policy implemented by Trump and that bill had only a small percentage of itself designated towards the border and it would have made permanent several Biden era changes which would have made illegal immigration much, much worse.

You have been corrected on this numerous times but you keeps spewing out these lies.

[Juxtapose]

*keep

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Oh, look, Tweedledee's come along. Do you agree with @NYCQuestions1976's "Don't try to come to the United States illegally. That completely solves the problem.", or do you agree it's stupid?

Do you even know what's been happening in Mexico because of Biden's diplomatic efforts? Numbers are way down because Mexico has been convinced to assist the US. How willing do you think they'll be to help if they've been hit with tariffs?

[Juxtapose]

@goaded Trump had better border numbers. Boom.

Looks like Tweedledee has come to say hi to Tweedledum 🤣

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Do you agree with @NYCQuestions1976's "Don't try to come to the United States illegally. That completely solves the problem.", or do you agree it's stupid?

[Juxtapose]

@goaded in the sense that the criminal aliens are creating the problem for themselves? Yeah, they have nothing to bitch about because they created the problem themselves.

If you are referring to illegal immigration in general, well that is going to necessitate mass deportations and a whole bunch of other things to solve that problem. So it's not just on the criminal alien to solve the issue because you can't mind control the criminal alien to do what you want so you have to prepare for them to break the law and disincentivize them accordingly.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose No, in the sense that "Don't try to come to the United States illegally." is not a solution to the problem of people coming to the country illegally at all. Any more than "don't murder" is a solution to murder.

The solution to the problem of deaths on the roads is not saying "don't have accidents", it's regulation and speed limits, and it's never completely going to go away.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded we can go full Poland and solve the problem.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Basically @goaded is saying, "The faucet is leaking slightly when it's turned off, so let's just leave it open it all the way and drown everyone." He's an idiot.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose So you're not going to admit that "Don't try to come to the United States illegally." is not a solution to the problem of people coming to the country illegally at all, any more than "don't murder" is a solution to murder, and @NYCQuestions1976 is going to keep ignoring that he said that and lie about what I'm saying.

I'm going to have a few days off from your trolling and lies.

You both know that your extremist views on immigrants is very unpopular with the US population.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose See? Amazing! @goaded did it again!

"You both know that your extremist views on immigrants is very unpopular with the US population."

He deliberately doesn't differentiate between ILLEGAL immigration and LEGAL immigration so he can continue to gaslight people with his dangerous socialism bullshit. Yet he'll continue to whine, "I dIdN't SaY tHaT!" What a balloon head.

Meanwhile, his own propaganda shows that approximately 70% of citizens in the United States want mass deportation for the millions of illegal immigrants let in during the four miserable years of Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris.

@goaded I hope your time off includes deep psychological corrective therapy and possibly a lobotomy to help treat your mental disorder known as socialism.

"The faucet has a slight leak when it's off, so let's just turn it on full-blast and drown everyone." - @goaded

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Ha! He blocked us! HA HA HA HA HA! Just another socialist loser.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 geez, I answered his damn question, took a nap and now he's fucking blocked my ass.

He's getting too emotional and needs to go for a walk or something. People are nuts.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose His unnecessary emotional behavior doesn't really bother me. It's actually sort of hilarious and entertaining. It's his dangerous and deliberate stupidity that's beyond annoying. He projects to no end, demands that you answer his completely nonsensical questions when you refuse to be gaslit by his socialism bullshit, and when you give him answers that shove his pompous arrogance in his face, he then claims that you're not answering his questions, because your answers publicly and intellectually humiliate him. He also claims that he didn't post things that he clearly posted (like when he purposely doesn't differentiate between Illegal immigration and legal immigration), and then calls you a liar when you call him out on it by pointing out verbatim it's exactly what he posted. He's a dangerous clown. He's like the Kim Jong Un of GaG.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 you're talking about trump?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Less drinking, more therapy. Socialism rightfully lost. Stop being obsessed.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 socialism was defeated rightfully.

[OddBeMe]

Socialism was never on the ballot. Oligarchy was. And you voted for it

[Juxtapose]

Keep telling yourself that.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Just 44 days until illegal immigrants start going bye bye and border security is properly enforced again. 👍

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 ok. Maybe then you'll see how much your economy needs them

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe You mean the millions of illegal immigrants being housed in hotels and other housing developments in sanctuary jurisdictions nationwide via hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars that Basement Biden and Word Salad Harris illegally let in over the last 4 miserable years? The correct answer would be "0%" (that's "ZERO PERCENT"). Thanks for playing.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 complete bullshit.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Nope, and they're all going bye bye very soon. Don't like it? Go claim that piece of unclaimed land in the Sahara Desert between Egypt and Sudan with the other stupid dangerous socialist on this thread, start your own country, and then the both of you can have all of the illegal immigrants you want living off your tax dollars. 👍

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 do you feel empowered blaming all your woes on the most vulnerable?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe They're not vulnerable. They're tax leeches and burdens on society that created their own consequences by illegally immigrating here. I'm not interested in your manufactured leftist sob stories and stupid excuses. Illegal immigrants don't belong here. Period.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 please provide proof of that bullsuit claim.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe It's not a bullshit claim. It's factual reality, and finally it's all coming to an spectacular end very soon. Housing illegal immigrants in hotels in sanctuary jurisdictions isn't free, Dumbass. It costs MONEY, via citizens' TAX DOLLARS. The only ones full of bullshit are you and the rest of the sniveling leftists who treat illegal immigrants like they're cute loveable animated characters from Disney movies that are living off of unicorn farts. Just 43 to go.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 then it should be easy to show me evidence confirming that bullshit. Because when I look it up, I get this:

Not even legal immigrants get much fed money genius
www.nilc.org/.../

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Leftist gaslighting propaganda bullshit. There are currently numerous hotels housing illegal immigrants in hotels in New York City and in other sanctuary jurisdictions nationwide that are being funded with citizens' tax dollars, including with state and local tax dollars, not just federal tax dollars.

www.nytimes.com/.../...ls-prices-migrants-nyc.html

Seven weeks, and they all start going bye bye. If you want your tax dollars being wasted on illegal immigrants, go start your own stupid country.

[exitseven]

If there was anything besides the pimp and two hookers the democrats have as star witnesses we would have heard it by now. I cannot wait to see ho the democrats try to derail Trump's next pick.

[goaded]

Venmo payment records.

[exitseven]

@goaded very easy to fake.

[goaded]

Not really. Do you think someone just printed out a table and said "these are his Venmo records", or they got them from Venmo?

[exitseven]

@goaded they could be made on Photoshop. I have made fake documents on Photoshop. Its very easy to do.

[goaded]

Then Gaetz would be suing various newspapers for defamation, wouldn't he?

[OddBeMe]

@goaded he doesn't understand blockchain, be gentle...

[msc545]

Try faking them to find out how difficult that is.

[Dargil]

Indictments, trials? Anybody can make up allegations. Gaetz was a Tactical move. Bondi will be confirmed.

[OddBeMe]

If he was convicted you'd just say lawfare or some dumb bullshit.

[goaded]

The report must be really bad.

[goaded]

In other words (not mine):
“Today I am announcing that I amd withdrawing from AG consideration to spend more time with someone else’s children.” –Matt Gaetz

[goaded]

"Matt Gaetz had to drop out because the number of days since his nomination was quickly approaching 18"

[Juxtapose]

No conviction = I don't care. Literally all you have against him is a witness who won't name themselves.

[goaded]

Would you broadcast your name and have to leave your whole life, like the women Guiliani defamed? And, no, there's the victim, a witness, and a co-conspirator who's in prison for sex trafficking, at least. Oh, and documentation: Venmo payments made by Gaetz using a boy's phone to pay for sex.

And why isn't paying for sex and taking illegal drugs disqualifying for high office?

[Juxtapose]

@goaded there is no conviction, this is all bullshit. I don't believe a fucking word you say about Matt because you regularly defame Trump and support total kangaroo court bullshit against him. Stop spreading socialist disinformation and stop gaslighting people with your bullshit nonsense.

[Juxtapose]

The case was fucking dropped, it's over. He was never convicted, just give it up.

[Juxtapose]

After a three year investigation the FBI declined to prosecute. Citing it was a false accusation.

[Juxtapose]

“We have just spoken with the DOJ and have been informed that they have concluded their investigation into Congressman Gaetz and allegations related to sex trafficking and obstruction of justice and they have determined not to bring any charges against him,” Gaetz attorneys Marc Mukasey and Isabelle Kirshner said in a statement.

NBC News had reported in October that the investigation into Gaetz had stalled, according to attorneys who have represented witnesses and people who have been subpoenaed or have spoken to investigators. The attorneys briefed about aspects of the case said the probe stalled over concerns about the credibility of two key witnesses or a lack of direct evidence implicating Gaetz, who has denied all wrongdoing."

www.google.com/.../rcna70839

[Juxtapose]

Yep, the investigation is concluded and there was concerns about The credibility of the witnesses and a lack of direct evidence implicating him. You have been fucking lying to me, AGAIN!

@NYCQuestions1976 see how he does it here as well? We need to fight his disinformation campaign.

[goaded]

Your hypocrisy is amazing. Here's an absolute lie of yours: "Citing it was a false accusation.".

Quote me the FBI saying "it was a false accusation". Not defence lawyers, or news reports (neither of which say he didn't do what he was accused of).

And why isn't paying for sex and taking illegal drugs disqualifying for high office, regardless of the age of the women?

[Juxtapose]

@goaded the case was dropped and they found the evidence severely wanting. Sounds like a false allegation to me, otherwise they would have kept investigating it to determine if it was true or not.

He didn't, those allegations have not been proven in a court of law.

[Juxtapose]

The witnesses were determined to not be reliable and there is no direct links connected to Matt.

[goaded]

Firstly the lie is a lie, because it is not about anything the FBI said, just your biased opinion. Secondly you are claiming that crimes never happened unless there's a conviction in court. How stupid is that?

[Juxtapose]

Uhhh yeah, they dropped the case so that is a false allegation. If they believed it was a real allegation they would still be pursuing it.

In America you are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. That's the foundation of our legal system. Your court of public opinion can suck a big, fat, veiny dick. You LOST.

[Juxtapose]

So get over your bullshit hysterics and stop gaslighting people with your dangerous misinformation and lies.

[goaded]

"bullshit hysterics"? "gaslighting"? You're the one claiming that not being able to prove a case means the crime didn't happen.

Remind me, why isn't paying for sex and taking illegal drugs disqualifying for high office, regardless of the age of the women?

[Juxtapose]

@goaded Matt is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Once again, your court of public opinion can go suck a dick.

Do you have video evidence of that? Do you have a rape kit? Do you have anything besides a few people talking shit with no physical evidence? No? Then yeah, you have no credibility. The more you push this, the more your credibility sinks.

[goaded]

Of course you don't apply that standard to the witnesses. You're claiming they're making criminally false allegations, when there's not even a hint of an investigation into that possiblity.

Face it, you only think they're guilty because they're not on your side and Gaetz must be innocent because he is on your side.

Typical.

Remind me, why isn't paying for sex and taking illegal drugs disqualifying for high office, regardless of the age of the women?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose All of the socialists like @goaded are just annoyed by the fact that people here in the United States and all over the world are no longer falling for their socialism grift. They're all just throwing their toys like petulant toddlers after you tell them they can't have more dessert and it's their bedtime.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Sure, you totally know what we're talking about.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded The FBI found the accusation to be false, Toddler.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 yep, the FBI found the accusations to be false and yet he is still throwing a fit and insisting guilt where there is none. All he has is subjective personal opinion and no fact.

[goaded]

No, they didn't. That's another lie of yours.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded People around the world are finally rejecting the paranoid socialism bullshit that you and your fellow Marxists have been peddling for decades. Give it up. It's over for your nonsensical insanity. Get a hobby and therapy.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 You keep saying that. That doesn't make it true.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded It's 100% true. Justin Trudeau is the next one to be voted out on his ass.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 I wish Matt stuck in.

[goaded]

Me too. I'd like to have seen Republican senators given the chance to forever put their names to supporting a regular purchaser of sex for the top law enforcement position in the land.

[Juxtapose]

The best way to handle people like you with fake bullshit is to never give them a single inch, never give up and never capitulate. Never give them any sort of credibility because they don't deserve any.

[goaded]

What "fake bullshit", exactly? The best way to handle people like you is with the truth.

Do you think that there is something wrong with people who constantly lie? ↗

[Juxtapose]

You go around assuming guilt based on what the deep state tells you. You're a deep state puppet.

[goaded]

Ah, that's some fake bullshit, right there. But it's not coming from me.

[Juxtapose]

If you are not a paid agent you could not do better for the deep state than what you do now if you were paid agent.

[goaded]

There is no deep state, that's just another lie you believe as a Trump meat puppet.

[Juxtapose]

HAHAHAHA 😂

https://youtu.be/jY1MiNfwcRg?si=Yy5rX8ygzhA6uI9-

[Juxtapose]

Eisenhower explains it as well:

https://youtu.be/SEGpTu8sVKI?si=JzXUeqbwXHi6w1sE

[goaded]

Greenwald is probably living off the Russians like your hero Pool was. $100,000 a week for a couple of videos?

[Juxtapose]

Edward Snowden explains it:

www.marketwatch.com/.../ed-snowden-talks-with-ron-paul-about-the-deep-state-and-whos-really-in-control-2017-06-21

[Juxtapose]

Do you really expect me to take your random "probably" with any seriousness?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Socialism is based in fear and lies. You have absolutely no moral, legal, political, and/or factual ability to call anyone a liar, unless you're looking in a mirror.

[goaded]

If you think that it's the MIC, fine, let's fight that. Do you really think Trump is going to do so, or just demand a cut of the action? The DoJ is not the MIC, nor is the DoE. They're just roadblocks on Trump stealing as much money as he can from you.

There's a reason a state's education secretary demanded bibles for every school and wrote the requirements that only Trump's $3 Bibles matched and will be bought for $60.

Wake up! He's a con man.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded The only con here is you and your socialism bullshit.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 $3 bibles printed in China and sold for $60 to people like you.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded I've never bought a Bible. The only con and grift here is you and your socialism bullshit.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 OK, so what is "socialism", to you?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose See how @goaded tries to pivot away from his fear mongering lies?

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 If anyone's still reading this thread, just scroll up.

[NYCQuestions1976]

Yes, scroll up and see @goaded show off his ignorance and Tourette's.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Suits me.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're foaming at the mouth over marked up Bibles printed in Communist China when billions of people worldwide buy billions of dollars worth of marked up smart phones made in Communist China every year.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 ^^ exactly 💯

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 I'm not "foaming at the mouth" about anything, I'm pointing out that a POTUS shouldn't be enriching themselves using their office (it's against the law), and that you trust absolutely someone who's pretending to be 100% USA while he rips people like you off with Chinese made tat. Anyone can scroll up and see.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded anyone can scroll up and see that you are delusional and hysteric.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Unfortunately because of direct personal experience with someone like this, my educated guess would be that @goaded has "narcissistic disorder, borderline personality disorder, histrionic tendencies, hypomania, sociopath", or some combination thereof.

@goaded Billions of people around the world spend hundreds of billions of dollars on marked up smart phones every year, and then do it again every 1 to 3 years, on average. At least the Bibles are biodegradable with little to no refining/processing necessary and last more than 3 years. Go wah about expensive Bibles somewhere else.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 They're not being sold by the President-elect of the United States. Don't you think your president should have a modicum of dignity?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded I vote for POLICY, not PERSONALITY.

[Juxtapose]

Trump has the right to sell whatever the fuck he wants after all he lost while fighting for America. He should have restitution paid to him for the lawfare waged against him and the assassination attempts.

[OddBeMe]

Even if he was convicted you'd say it as rigged. Right wing insanity

[Juxtapose]

If it's a legitimate trial that's not kangaroo court style, I would not contest it.

[OddBeMe]

If you read your own posts like we do, I think you'd be fucking shocked.

[Juxtapose]

I would need to bash my head against the wall in order to think at that level.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Stop day drinking (at least on weekdays) and get therapy.

[OddBeMe]

So district of new york court is now kangaroo? Listen to your bullshit

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe You mean when a local prosecutor in a state court brings federal charges on a single expired state misdemeanor that magically (illegally) became multiple felonies? Yes, that's the EPITOME of BULLSHIT.

As for the other nonsensical New York case, that's in the process of being overturned by the New York State Appellate Court.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 ^^ this

[goaded]

Not federal charges, and they were found reasonable by a grand jury, an appeals court, and an actual trial jury.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded What Appellate Court? WRONG! Both New York cases are nonsensical lawfare bullshit, and both will be overturned by the New York State Appellate Court. The James case is already in the process of being overturned, and the Alvin Simon Theodore Bragg case will also be overturned. That's why he wants his case to be suspended until 2029.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Appeals courts ruled time and again that the case should remain in Merchan's court, that there were no grounds for dismissal, and so on. I wasn't talking about appealing the conviction (which has to wait until after sentencing).

[OddBeMe]

@goaded they just keep parroting fox news bullshit.

@NYCQuestions1976 Did trump commit a felony?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded No, Dumbass. Motions aren't appeals. The New York State Appellate Court has yet to hear ANY oral appeal arguments on the Merchan/Bragg case. Any motion (s) filed DURING the case (on either side) don't go to the Appellate Court. They're heard by, and argued in front of, Merchan. The Appellate Court doesn't receive the (any) case until such case is concluded. Then an appeal is filed with the Appellate Court. If I remember correctly, in the state of New York, it's called an Article 78 across the board (criminal, civil, traffic appeals). That's how it works.

@OddBeMe No, and I clearly explained the numerous reasons why numerous times, here and elsewhere.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 they won't ever listen, they will continue to conveniently ignore your corrections and repeat the same lies. And then if you get tired of correcting them, they will declare themselves the victors because surely if they are wrong you will be willing to disprove them.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 I didn't say he'd appealled the conviction, I'm talking about the various parties who decided the charges were valid (grand jury and trial jury, plus the lawyers for both sides - I don't think the defence ever tried to argue the charges weren't valid in court).

However, I made a mistake: it was the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct that dismissed the ethics complaint Trump filed regarding the case, not an appeals court, and they wouldn't have considered the indictment.

But of course Trump did commit 34 felonies in that case and has only avoided conviction in the other cases by running out the clock, rather than letting a jury hear the evidence.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded they literally magically turned some misdemeanors into felonies. You absolute fool.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose An EXPIRED misdemeanor.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 I should really jot this stuff down in my notes so I can throw it in their faces whenever they come up with this bullshit.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded A local prosecutor in a state court brought federal charges on a single expired state misdemeanor that magically (illegally) became multiple felonies. That's the EPITOME of BULLSHIT, and that's why Bragg asked for a nonsensical 5 year continuance (postponement). He knows that his case is going to be overturned by the Appellate Court.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Funny how no lawyers or the judge noticed what you did. The trial could have been over before it began!

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Funny how Bragg is so confident that his case won't be overturned by the Appellate Court that he asked for a FIVE YEAR CONTINUANCE. 😂😂😂😂😂

[OddBeMe]

No one can turn a misdemeanor into a felony dumbass.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 they are so ignorant they don't even know how the misdemeanor was turned into a felony.

[goaded]

Falsifying business records to cover up a crime is a felony in New York State. It's not a misdemeanour. You're not ignorant of that, you're simply lying.

[OddBeMe]

Show me how a misdemeanor can be turned into a felony. Show me.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded there was nothing of the sort done. The banks that did business with Trump testified on his behalf and enjoyed doing business with him.

[Juxtapose]

"A Deutsche Bank executive says the bank followed its own guidelines — which include independently verifying information — when deciding to lend Donald Trump’s company hundreds of millions of dollars"

"A Deutsche Bank executive says the bank followed its own guidelines — which include independently verifying information — when deciding to lend Donald Trump’s company hundreds of millions of dollars"

www.usnews.com/.../banker-involved-in-big-loans-to-trumps-company-testifies-for-his-defense-in-civil-fraud-trial

[goaded]

Now you're pretending to not understand that the criminal case, where Trump was found guilty of 34 felonies is the same as the civil case where Trump was found liable for fraud. You're not ignorant of that, you're simply lying.

[OddBeMe]

We're not posting transcripts of his case. You can read his convictions and appeals denials.

Still waiting for how a misdemeanor is turned into a felony.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded they're all different flavors of bullshit.

[goaded]

You should know the different flavours, what with all of it that comes out of your mouth.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded @OddBeMe You're both lying obstinate socialist dumb fucks gaslighting people and spreading disinformation.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 it's you guys who are either lying or stupid as fck. Everything we said can be backed up with evidence.

You fucks just toss around lthw terms aw fare and deep state to get out posting evidende.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Far-left circle-jerk sources are only evidence of your gullibility.

Less drinking, more therapy.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 far left circle jerks = accredited news agencies top afraid to print bullshit. Your circle jerk is some right wing youtube channel

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe More therapy, less drinking. You're turning your brain into soup.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 more learnin' and you'd have better comebacks.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe No need to stress for my light work.

[OddBeMe]

Oh i dont. can't blame irrationality and xenophobia for winning an election.

I stress my libtard side can't get off their asses long enough to vote.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe You mean liberals are lazy? No!

Over 155 million people voted for President. Over 80 million people who voted for President in the election voted for change.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 258 million americans can vote genius. So, this wasn't a mandate by the majority. It was a loss by laziness.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Around half the electorate don't vote in every election. Been that way for decades. Nice try though.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 2020 election was over 66% turnout. People have short memories and get misinformed a lot.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded the dead didn't vote this time like in 2020 😂

[goaded]

Like that Trump voter who voted for the dead wife he's murdered and claimed it was proof of voter fraud?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're a lying sack of shit, or @OddBeMe is a disingenuous sack of shit. Just under 160 million people voted in 2020. Just under 153 million voted this year (the tally so far, and fucking ridiculous it takes this long). That's only a 7 million difference in voter turnout. Eligible to vote, registered to vote, and actually voting are 3 totally different things, and at no time were there ever 258 million people registered to vote. As of September 2024, 186.5 million people were registered to vote. So only about 33 million people who are registered to vote didn't vote this year.

usafacts.org/.../

The two of you can't count, and you both need to get your shit together.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Look! @goaded is back harping on the one or two or three voter fraud (s) again, and still willing to ignore the thousands of illegitimate voters that had to be purged!

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 What's wrong with you (and Trump) that you can't accept a win without having to make out it was bigger than it was?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded I didn't bring it up. You're the one denying that it was a landslide. 80 million people who voted for President voted for a REGIME CHANGE.

Statistics, again:

States expected to win that were won convincingly (by 10% or higher) compared to states that were just won:

Harris: 13-6
Trump: 24-0

Swing states results:

Harris: 0-7
Trump:7-0

States expected to lose, but the losing candidate over-performed and/or performed well:

Harris: 0-24
Trump: 6-13

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 I appreciate your attempts at spin, but none of that says Trump got more than 50% of the vote. What's wrong with you (and Trump) that you can't accept a win without having to make out it was bigger than it was?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded Spin? Those are factual statistics. Check the map yourself, Balloon Head.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 I know they're facts, and you're doing a good job of spinning them to cover up the fact that Trump still got fewer than half the votes. I just wonder why you're bothering, when you could just take the win.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You're the one who brought it up, and Google disagrees with you.

[Juxtapose]

@NYCQuestions1976 so much for him only blocking us for a few days, huh?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose He'll unblock us. He's too pompous and arrogant to keep us blocked. 😂

[NYCQuestions1976]

No, the FBI found it to be a false accusation. Stop day drinking and get therapy.

[OddBeMe]

Fbi didn't find anything at all. Except for his pal who was convicted. Like all repubs they're spared.

[NYCQuestions1976]

Less drinking, more therapy.

[noohair]

If we arrested every man over 18 that had sex with a 17 year old we would have 40 million men in prison...

[OddBeMe]

I'm ok with that. Illegals would take your jobs and do better at them.

[Snakeyes7]

Probably because there are no merit to the allegations placed against Gaetz and they'd rather not say that he was not guilty.

[goaded]

So, why did the Republicans in the House vote not to release the proof of his innocence?

That's what the report must be, right?

[Snakeyes7]

@goaded Probably because they all hate him and would do anything to not see him become AG.

[goaded]

Thanks for the laugh! Republicans didn't release the report documenting Gaetz's misdeads because they hated him. Presumably Democrats voted to release them because they loved him!

[Snakeyes7]

@goaded The dems are asking for it because they are sure there is something there and the republicans don't want his innocence to be proven, that's my guess anyway. He is very anti-establishment in a sea of establishment politicians so they would do anything to not see him take power.

[goaded]

The people on the committee know exactly what's in it. Don't be ridiculous.

[Snakeyes7]

@goaded Oh you do huh? Are you a part of it?

[Snakeyes7]

*oh they do huh?

[goaded]

Of course they do, they write it as a committee and vote on the final report. How can you vote on whether to release, or not, something you haven't seen?

[OddBeMe]

@goaded i would say they do vote on shit they don't read. Most bills are written by lobbiests. But anythjng that exposes their corruption like insider trading they'll decline

[goaded]

Massive bills on the House floor, perhaps, but not in situations like this. Not engaged people on committees.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Justice department investigation was two years and found nothing.

[RedInnocent69]

It’s tough when the leadership of your party is dominated by sex offenders