Do you think that there is something wrong with people who constantly lie?

[msc545]

[lightbulb27]

Yes, but that's different from admitting what is true. Some people won't let other facts displace their beliefs. so it isn't lying to them.. they hold to their view, even if it's flawed... and will defend it. Perspective, ones answers, are projected from within. This why I've said before, this is emotional control, not necessarily logical fact.

In the political theatre, it's worse because admitting to faults, showing weakness, is not acceptable. Do that... and you are finished. So a mountain of BS can be generated. Clinton lead the way demonstrating what "teflon" was like... if something doesn't stick... it isn't true and tuned out. If one accepts blame or fault, then they are forever tagged and demeaned. Thus in court of law and opinion, you never confess.

Such is the power games played. It's unfortunately, but we don't honour what is true in such theatre.

[goaded]

Have you been following some of my conversations on here recently?

Yes, I do.

They lie, then they ignore proof that they're lying and move on to another lie. It's interminable. Ignoring them, of course, just means the lies stay there.

[msc545]

good points. I appreciate that you confront people about their lies on here. I haven't the energy for it very often.

[goaded]

If it's not clear to everyone, I'm mostly referring to the idiots tag-teaming me on another opinion on here.

[msc545]

Just keeping up with Juxtapose and his constant inveterate lying would be a huge task.

[goaded]

I think that's the point. The other guy won't admit gravity exists, if he's claimed it doesn't.

[msc545]

I think its a contest between NYCQuestions1976 and Juxtapose to see who can lie the most per day...

[goaded]

@Juxtapose You certainly are winning the competition for most lies, yes. Not hard, when we're not lying.

[PBandJ_Nerd]

Possibly? Sometimes people lie but they don't mean to lie, so for that I'd say maybe they have something like anxiety or another mental health issue that needs to be addressed. But if they're a person, who does it and see's nothing wrong with it, then that's something else.

[Flower7]

Yeah, for sure. They seem very disturbed and not normal.

[exitseven]

yes, some people cannot help themselves. They even lie when they don't have to. Like telling people that your uncle was eaten by cannibals.

[ProbablyClueless]

Very wrong. Serial liars and grifters pose a huge threat to society.

[slatyb]

I've known a few. It's very sad, a result of deep insecurity. It's intolerable in a partner and barely tolerable in a friend.

[DrPepper12]

Yes and no.

Yes. Constant lying to known persons is sociopathic behavior.

No. Constantly lying is an evolutionary advantage over strangers.

[Anonymous]

just look at feminists and tell yourself there's nothing wrong with them

well telling yourself that would just be you lying to yourself lmao

[KrakenAttackin]

Absolutely. Most people do lie on some level or another, but pathological liars are in their own league.

[Dargil]

Yes. They have some kind of neurosis. Hillary and Shiff qualify.

[seeyounexttuesday]

It's apparent if you watch corporate media. They're mentally deranged.

[NYCQuestions1976]

Far-left liberals, socialists, progressives, and the woke do nothing but lie. Gaslighting people with their divisive disinformation is part of their con and grift.

[msc545]

you just managed to lie... about who lies!

[msc545]

Prove it. Offer some real evidence.

[NYCQuestions1976]

Sure. I'll start with three:

Exhibit A: The last 4 years. Biden is "just fine". The left and the left-leaning mainstream media covered for him until they were all forced to face the reality that people with common sense, intelligence, and critical thinking knew all along: Biden has had beer farts between his ears for a long time.

Exhibit B: DEI. The only thing that DEI really stands for is "Didn't Earn It". The entire leftist DEI grift undermines meritocracy and promotes incompetence and failing upwards.

Exhibit C: "The election is close." The mainstream media and the pollsters were all wishcasting. I explained ad nauseum on other threads on this site how Trump was going to win and it probably wouldn't be close. The tells were all there. Al you had to do was follow the money. I'm still waiting on numerous apologies for this one.

[NYCQuestions1976]

Hmmm... apparently when you put "C" and ":" next to one another on this site, you get C: . Interesting.

[msc545]

These are just your unsupported opinions. Do you have any idea what EVIDENCE actually is?

[NYCQuestions1976]

Unsupported opinions?

A.) Biden dropped out of the race after the debate where he declared, "We finally beat Medicare!" Democrats and the mainstream media did an immediate 180° after that debate, going from covering for Biden for years to "Drop out now!"

B.) The default core mission of DEI is to prioritize hiring and promoting people on factors other than meritocracy when meritocracy should be the one and only consideration for any and all professional positions. DEI = Didn't Earn It.

C.) Trump did win the election, and it wasn't close.

D.) Try it out. When you type "C" and ":" next to one another on this site, you get an emoji.

These are all actual factual reality that happened/are happening, not "unsupported opinions".

[goaded]

It's literally the smallest popular vote difference since 2000, and before that the 1960s. C:

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded The majority of voters who voted for President in the 2024 election voted for a regime change:
youtube.com/shorts/RK6oC4oM2fA?si=QNc0y6RtVWEwoNPp
www.google.com/search

[goaded]

The majority of voters didn't vote for Trump. Trump's popular vote margin is tiny compared to almost all presidential elections in the last century (there were just 3 closer out of 25).

Oh, and that stupid map shows land, not people.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded The majority of voters who voted for President in the 2024 election voted for a REGIME CHANGE, and not 4 more years of the same Basement Biden bullshit via Word Salad Harris. That's well over 79.3 million votes and counting, and over 5.1 million more votes than Harris received.

Of course a map of the United States shows land. Duh. That's called GEOGRAPHY. Specifically geopolitical geography. Where do over 99.999% of people on Earth live? News Flash: People live on LAND.

@Juxtapose ⬆️ Get a load of THIS nonsensical @goaded insanity now! ⬆️😂

[goaded]

Land doesn't vote, dumbass, people do. So you think counting everybody who didn't vote for Harris is OK and says something about her, but counting everybody who didn't vote for Trump (over 50%) doesn't say anything about him.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded Trump still received more votes than Harris did so I don't really see what your point is here. She would have received less if all states required voter ID.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Do you see me denying that? What I'm saying, which is absolute fact, is that Trump received fewer than 50% of the votes cast, and that his under 1.7% margin is very small. You two, on the other hand, are painting this objectively very close election as anything but, or pretending it would have been bigger if reality matched what you think should be. It doesn't.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded she did not win a single state with voter ID id. I suspect that if voter ID was required in every state, she would have won two states.

[Juxtapose]

But rest assured, this will be investigated in the future.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Ah, yes, the promise of weaponising the DoJ, based on the lie that the Democrats already did. Same as the lie that Democrats supposedly removed the filibuster on SCOTUS picks (which McConnell promptly did).

Voter ID is just a marker for whether the state is run by Republicans or sane people. It's not even a 100% correlation.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded nope, the DOJ is going to go after real crimes now. These criminals are going to reap the consequences of their actions.

Voter ID is an IQ test. You have failed it.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded It states that nearly 80 million people who voted for President in the 2024 election voted for change over statis quo.

@Juxtapose I've got a really good educated guess as to why @goaded is so obsessed with a "margin" that's "very small". 😂

[goaded]

Yes, it's because it's a fact that the margin is very small. 1.7% is very small. It's not a large number. It's 0.017. That's not a big number, you absolute idiot.

[Juxtapose]

He can deny it all he wants but the fact of the matter is, is that Trump has a public mandate. He had a massive victory against incredibly unfair odds that were stacked against him by the establishment. He is a hero and deserves to be put on Mount Rushmore.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose "massive victory"? 1.7% is very small. It's not a large number. It's 0.017. That's not a big number, you absolute idiot.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded 1.7% out of 100% is still 1.7%. 0.017% out of 100% is still 0.017%. 1.7% and 0.017% are two different amounts. That 1.7% translates into over a 2.5 million vote advantage for Trump over Harris. You don't understand how numbers, percents, and mathematics work.

[Juxtapose]

@goaded I know that you are trying to use technicalities to diminish his incredible victory but it's not going to work on me. People in America know what Trump was up against and how he miraculously overcame it. He even survived attempts against his life, he almost died for America and he is a hero. I should reiterate that he deserves to be put on Mount Rushmore for fighting so faithfully for America.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose By "technicalities", you mean simple maths and comparisons with other elections, yes. 1.7% is better than 2000, 1968, and (ircc) 1960, but that's it for about a century. Nothing to write home about.

Again you prove my point that you're in a cult: "how he miraculously overcame it".

Trump doesn't even have a scar. I've been injured worse many times.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Yeah, what's wrong with you? @goaded has been injured far worse. He dropped his phone on his toe when he saw that Trump won. 👍😂

[Juxtapose]

@goaded he does have a scar on his ear. You're insane.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Show me. (By the way, you two are being excellent examples for this question!)

I asked you both on another question:
"For anyone else, this would be an easy question to answer, probably not for you two:

Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien? Yes or no."

I have one answer: " @goaded dude lol no they're not but they also CANNOT vote. ", thank you, which is an amazing admission. I'll just wait for the answer from the person who called me "blatantly batshit insane".

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded You simply don't like my response because it proves that you're tremendously wrong, and when you're wrong, as usual, you change the subject, invoke misdirection, and/or move the goalposts.

[goaded]

The other answer: "Your question is irrelevant, pointless, and stupid" doesn't really fit into yes or no.

"The word "non-citizen" was invented and used by the far-left to deliberately blur the lines between illegal immigration and legal immigration" is just ridiculous.

It also looks like I've trapped the fleshbot into a loop:
"Your question is irrelevant, pointless, and stupid. The word "non-citizen" was invented and used by the far-left to deliberately blur the lines between illegal immigration and legal immigration, and so they can push unconstitutional illegal voting legislation on actual citizens of the United States.

Furthermore, "a person living legally in the United States" isn't the Constitutional criteria for LEGALLY VOTING in ANY election. So once again: ONLY CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES ARE LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY ALLOWED TO VOTE IN ELECTIONS ACROSS THE BOARD IN THE UNITED STATES. "

[goaded]

Oops, we overlapped.

Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien? Yes or no.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded The topic at hand is "Legal Voting In United States Elections". You attempted to change the subject to "Legal Non-Citizens In The United States That Happen To Exist", which has NOTHING to do with legal citizens legally voting in elections all across the board in the United States. I don't placate "dog catcher" morons like yourself who were proven wrong, and then pivot away from the conversation in an attempt to save face.

[goaded]

It's literally: "Do you think that there is something wrong with people who constantly lie?", but do go on...

I don't mind if you answer the simple question "Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien? Yes or no." here, or elsewhere.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@goaded All you do is lie, because your belief system is built on lies. It must be a form of the yips. You were proven wrong with your "dog catcher" comment and refuse to admit that you're wrong yet again. That's the bottom line.

[msc545]

@Juxtapose His is a mentally ill criminal who managed to con a lot of people because his only outstanding skill is grifting. He got you, didn't he

[goaded]

Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien? Yes or no.

[goaded]

No. Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien? Yes or no.

[msc545]

@goaded That depends on the person's skin color, according to the Right.

[goaded]

@msc545 Please don't do that. I like their idiocy to be recorded for all time.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@msc545 It has NOTHING to do with skin color. You're either a citizen of the United States, born here or through legal naturalization, or you're an illegal immigrant. Only the far-left wants to deliberately blur the lines between illegal immigration and legal immigration, and citizens and non-citizens, and only the far-left are concerned with skin color, as your comment proves.

[goaded]

Again: Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien? Yes or no.

[Juxtapose]

Guys lol don't argue for NON-CITIZENS (tourists, etc) to vote 🤣 Are you serious?

[Juxtapose]

I shouldn't be able to vote in Germany if I am not a citizen.

[Juxtapose]

You can be a legal visitor but not a CITIZEN. There isn't ONLY citizens & illegals.. we have tourists homie.

[Juxtapose]

And then bringing race into it is just bait.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Do you really see the question "Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien?" an argument for non-citizens voting? Why?

It's a perfectly simple question with a perfectly simple answer that @NYCQuestions1976 obviously doesn't want to answer.

[goaded]

Hell, the answer is in the question: "Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien?" (Look at both words containing the five letters "legal".)

[Juxtapose]

Ohhh I think he misunderstood.

[goaded]

@Juxtapose Really?

[goaded]

Is that why you bring him in to conversations?

[Juxtapose]

He's goaded homie.

[Juxtapose]

Hahaha 🤣

[Juxtapose]

Yeah I thought that's what you meant.

[goaded]

@NYCQuestions1976 Is a person living legally in the United States an illegal alien?

[msc545]

Since he hasn't bothered to answer your question, I will attempt the answer. I think that people like juxtapose and New York questions believe that even legal aliens are undesirable at best and and should be deported because they don't like them.

[Juxtapose]

@msc545 nyc literally answered this line of questioning in another post so why would he answer it again here?

Maybe look into things before exposing your ignorance.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@msc545 I fully support LEGAL immigration. Immigrate here LEGALLY, or don't come here. Period. Meanwhile, the far-left wants to deliberately blur the lines between illegal immigration and legal immigration, and citizens and non-citizens, as @goaded is demonstrating. Liberals wasting our tax dollars treating illegal immigrants better than the people who immigrated here legally, poor people who were born here, homeless service veterans, and citizens with ongoing mental health issues is absolutely nonsensical and ridiculous.

[Juxtapose]

See? I told you guys, he didn't mean it how you meant.

[Juxtapose]

And I think as an autistic person I should get way more money than these illegals get. Let's put our own citizens first instead of the illegals which are just shoved into this country to inflate senate seats and whatnot.

Oh and speaking of the senate, repeal the 17th. Let's de-federalize their politics and have them focused on their states again.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Juxtapose Term limits for the House and Senate.

[Sevenpointfive]

yes. because there is

[Justneedtokno]

I think there might some Trama

[jazzy34]

Yes.

[Anonymous]

Learned deviance

[noohair]

Sure, but it has been normalized by society.