A woman scorned and suddenly she's a liberal?

[OddBeMe]

I love how late conservatives are to every party. Slavery, health insurance, war...

[Tiffany_Taylor_Made]

I know you are very likely being sarcastic, but for those that might not catch on, Laura Loomer is definitely no liberal. Loomer is nothing more than a dimwitted, odd-looking political grifter riding the coattails of Donald Trump's political career to advance her own. She made a name for herself in conservative circles by making controversial statements that can undoubtedly be described as prejudiced, such as by calling Black women that are much more qualified than her at practically anything "DEI Shaniquas," stating that Muslims should not seek public office in the United States, and described herself as a white nationalist. However, despite saying numerous controversial things throughout her pathetic "career" if you even wish to call it that, Elon Musty only recently limited her Twitter account after she disagreed with him on the issue of hiring foreign employees. Her tweet should not be taken as a literal belief that the powerful billionaires are the problem. Instead, it should just be taken as nothing more than a personal jab at her new enemy, Elon Musty for censoring her on Twitter. The ironic part is that her tweet can describe Donald Trump as well, but she won't say the same thing about him or she would risk losing the grift not only with Trump, but with ultraconservatives as a whole.

[OddBeMe]

And Elon has that right to censor as it's his business. Kinda what liberals been saying forever

[Tiffany_Taylor_Made]

@ashika60: No, I will not DM you. Stop stalking me on every fucking answer of mine.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

The thing is that a lot of them didn't care until it affected them personally in a negative way, but most still blame the democrats for even that. Loomer just has a beef with Muskrat which is why she suddenly is calling that out specifically. If he was benefitting her instead of demonitizing her, she'd be in lockstep with the whole thing too.

[OddBeMe]

Bingo

[Sevenpointfive]

it's almost like the government hates you. i've known that since i was a child! the story is written. they pit democrats and republicans against each other when it's the same story no matter the outcome. but you people are too stupid to realize it. so you keep voting thinking you're making a difference.

maybe it is time to join black people and rise up because they need a sane friend right now. they are trying to be won over with DEI but it's not evolved enough YET. it's as if they think every white person is too racist to have any common ground. we live in the same society, with the same rules and the same grievances in different ways that they force upon people.

how can we not join forces and rise up against that?

[OddBeMe]

If only everyone voted

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe 155,387,942 people voted for President in 2024, out of 161.42 million registered voters (that's a 96.263128484698% registered voter turnout). So those of us who are registered to vote, turned out to vote. 244,666,890 are eligible to vote, but 89,278,948 eligible voters aren't registered to vote. People are allowed to be apolitical.

[Sevenpointfive]

@OddBeMe it's not about voting anymore.
@NYCQuestions1976 you are right! to a point.

one year limit for any type of official that has more than that. there shouldn't be a term for any position. that's crazy! and i'd liked to see that throughout the entire government down to local positions. every single one of them abuses their power. and if they don't, they are being abused by others to keep theirs.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Sevenpointfive House and Senate term limits would be excellent. Hopefully it happens in our lifetime.

[Sevenpointfive]

@NYCQuestions1976 any elected position needs a one year limit and the possibilities of violating it with removal immediately. no red tape! no connections to save you!

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Sevenpointfive I'd support each House and Senate term being 2 and 4 years, and the limits being 4 and 2 terms served, respectively. I understand and agree with your reasoning behind your plan, but having to change every position in the entire government every Election Day would probably impede efficiency and cause unintended chaos.

[Sevenpointfive]

@NYCQuestions1976 that should scare you! it should cause chaos! if there is no one we can trust in the government anymore then we have to fix it until we don't.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Sevenpointfive Have you ever been asked to suddenly finish a project at work that someone else had started, and you previously had no part of whatsoever? Well imagine that happening everywhere throughout the entire country in every level of government at the exact same time every single year. It's too much uncertainty. I support the chaos that you want, but in moderation. Turning over the entire government annually would completely backfire. I'm confident that we could attain the results that you're looking for, with the term limits plan that I suggested.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 you're not allowed to discount unregistered voters, many likely purged

[Sevenpointfive]

@NYCQuestions1976 so the problem isn't the limits right now. the problem is the confidence that their vote will be counted. it's totally gotta start from there. reform elections or they won't change. it doesn't matter who the candidates are. no one believes in it anymore. we're a society clinging to a false hope that we know doesn't exist

[Sevenpointfive]

@NYCQuestions1976 i don't think i said a 1-year term limit, but definitely an election. no more 4 year tenures

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Sevenpointfive Did you mean one year limits for those who are already actively serving multiple terms in the government? If so, then I apologize for misunderstanding you.

@OddBeMe "you're not allowed to discount unregistered voters, many likely purged"

WRONG!

Eligible unregistered voters:

2008: 98,262,967
2012: 92,206,198
2016: 92,035,382
2020: 80,899,282
2024: 89,278,948

Better start investigating Obama for all of those "purged" voters!

[Sevenpointfive]

@NYCQuestions1976 yes

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 states are doing the purging moron

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe The only people who ever get purged from voting registries are those who go more than a calendar year without voting in a general election (that rule varies slightly by state), illegal voters, and the dead. Also, people purged from voting registries are by definition, NOT eligible unregistered voters (except for "stale" registered voters who hadn't been voting at least annually, and that's their own fault). Key word: ELIGIBLE.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 general elections are every 4 years you dumb shit

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe No, Foolio. PRESIDENTIAL elections are every four years, and midterm elections are also every four years, offset by two years from Presidential elections. General elections are every November. Less drinking, more studying.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 the general election is the presidential one. Which is why in between there's significantly less. So if they purge unused voters rolls after a year that means diddly

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe The Presidential election is a general election, but not all general elections are Presidential elections. Every November election is a general election. Less drinking, more studying.

[Snakeyes7]

Corporations cannot exist in a capitalist system because that would mean that lobbying would be made illegal for the sake of upholding competition.

Real Capitalism hasn't been tried either. That means no taxes, no licenses, no
fees, no trade restrictions, no labor laws, and no need for insurance.

The real world it has been conclusively
proven that capitalism has problems, and capitalism can fail. It has also shown time and time again that communism is a problem, and it always fails.

You try leaving the means of production in the hands of people who only know how to clean bathrooms and they will eventually find a leader who will take advantage of their ignorance, i. e. Stalin.

[OddBeMe]

True, like real equality, a perfect capitalist system won't be attained. Which is why govt regulation (cough... socialism) is needed as a counter balance

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe You just want the government to hand you free shit off of other people's hard work. Luckily, the United States will NEVER be a socialist country.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 no, i just agree with our founders who believed in balance. Are you saying the founders were wrong!!

[NYCQuestions1976]

The founders of this country weren't socialists. It's "We The People", not "We The Government".

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 funny they made the govt do a lot of things...

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Don't be naïve and/or obtuse. They needed ALL of the colonies on board to successfully revolt against England. "The enemy of my enemy..."

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 not following. They made a govt with power to control commerce and police.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Evidently you failed Domestic History along with Spelling. The United States is a Constitutional Republic driven by capitalism. Exactly zero of the Founding Fathers were sniveling socialists.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 didn't say they were. Just calling socialism what it is. Which you clearly don't know.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe I know all about the evil socialism grift. Gaslighting people into favoring intrusive government overlords and regulations at the grave expense of individual personal rights and freedoms.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 what's non-intrusive government?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe The fact that you don't know the answer highlights the problem.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 so you can't answer it

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe You presented nothing to answer.

[Sevenpointfive]

he does know. he's got bibi

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 what is non intrusive govt? That doesn’t exist

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe You mean leftists try to make non-intrusive government non-existent.

[OddBeMe]

@NYCQuestions1976 like telling women and trans people what to do with their bodies?

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Once you're 18, you can do whatever you want, just as long as you're not using my money. It's not of my business medically, and that also means it's not my financial responsibility. "Your body, your choice, your wallet." Also, let's not forget this happened:

www.nytimes.com/.../...blockers-olson-kennedy.html

At least the leftists in the Union Of European Socialist Republics are finally backing off their support for mutilation of minors after the science shows what the rest of us with common sense, intelligence, and critical thinking skills knew all along. Here? All of you leftist morons double down on your egregious stupidity. Then all you leftist idiots can't figure out why you lose elections.

[Snakeyes7]

All capitalism asks of the government economically is to uphold competition through antitrust laws, that's it. Anything more will make it harder for everyone.

Right not the government is doing everything but throwing the book at corporations for their antitrust practices.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@Snakeyes7 The only times the government uses antitrust laws is whenever they believe that they're not getting enough of a cut of a company's profits. Politicians could care less about competition and the free market. The government only cares about lining their own pockets with money that they didn't earn.

[Sevenpointfive]

@Snakeyes7 and lobbying with a paycheck in hand shouldn't happen!

[exitseven]

I think it is even funnier when these moonbats drool over all these liberal billionaires like Mark Zuckerburg that are all for censorship and abolishing the first amendments and as soon as Elon Musk decides that the anti American policies of the democrats are not really in the best interest of most everyone that is human he is all of a sudden a threat to our country.

Well, it sure as hell was not Elon Musk that allowed 20 million illegal aliens to bankrupt the country.

[dustybiker2]

People who lose their mind or prove they are mentally unstable do become a threat to our country,

[dustybiker2]

I would say the same of Biden though. His mind is failing.

[exitseven]

@dustybiker2 yes, we currently have a president that has had a lost mind for a few years.. It explains a lot.

[dustybiker2]

And you helped vote another back in, since you want to take shots.

[exitseven]

@dustybiker2 President Trump has taken a mental acuity test but more than that he has showed he can function without a teleprompter, be interviews without prior knowledge of the questions and campaign for 70 days without a break, get shot and come back a day later.

[dustybiker2]

Claims to have had a mental test? Claims he was shot? His followers will believe anything he says.

[exitseven]

@dustybiker2 He did have a mental acuity rest and he passed. Do you think the fake news would have said he passed it if he did not? He was really shot unless you think it was an elaborate plot to fake it which happened to result in the death of a fire fighter and the shooter.

[OddBeMe]

Sigh... private companies aren't limited by the first amendment. Just like vaccines and grocery stores.

[Kaneki05]

It's because communism makes sense. Everyone knows it does. The idea is good and helps everyone. But conservatives are always worried about the hypothetical Stalin situation, but I am sure wouldn't happen in US as US is way more stable than Russia was or even is.

[Snakeyes7]

"It won't happen to me" is what people always say before they fall victim to the very thing they think won't happen.

[Kaneki05]

Thanks for proving my point.
Also if your implying it would happen but won't happen by staying capitalists, so maybe you should quote that back to yourself 'It won't happen to me' because this statement makes no sense and applies right back to you.

[lightbulb27]

Move to cuba… take 1/2 of Miami with you, and let us know how it works out in 10 years.

[Kaneki05]

@lightbulb27 I'm confused do you think Cuba is in the same nature as the more secure, stable and wealthy America? If not how is this an accurate response to my point at all?
This remark proves to me, that people really don't get why and how these countries faced the problems they did several glazed factors.

[lightbulb27]

you said communism makes sense. Cuba is communist, so I suggest living there. You are saying there are other factors... I assume that means it's not a great place to live. So choose another communist country to live in and dwell there if that is what you think is good.
The idea of everyone sharing more equally is a good idea... and as well, money is not the only determinant of good is also valid. is that the idea?

[Kaneki05]

@lightbulb27 Oh boy you really don't get my point nor reply at all.
I don't know how to explain it further to you really, I tried to think of an example with how Germany got to where it was before Hitler but while it made sense to me you wouldn't of understood it.
All I can say is a country that has problems like Cuba, Or Russia or China didn't come out of nowhere and all the sudden due to communism.

[Snakeyes7]

@Kaneki05
The US has been capitalist since day 1, what are you talking about? The reason things are going to shit right now is because the government is getting its grubby hands on things they think should go out if business (i. e. anything to do with the oil industry) and letting the other businesses get away with blatant antitrust violations due to lobbying. You can't blame the blatant disregard to how an economic system works as the reason the economic system should be disregarded entirely.

The government is the reason why everything is going to shit and you think giving them control of the means of production is a good idea?

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 Since when did I say America wasn't? And oh yeah so in your mind the government is the problem yeah see how far America goes without it, now your sounding off like a defund the police nut. And... umm news flash the government has been around since the very start. So unless you think it all started going down hill in 17ths your not making any sense and even if you do then you truly just want to live in a US that never existed lol.

I think you have no clue what my point even was, and replying with takes that don't make any sense back rather than what I just said. At least I hope.

[Kaneki05]

Should say though wanting to live in a US that never existed is at least progress though yours would be everyone fends for themselves which ya know is the opposite and much worse than having a government for obvious reasons.

[Snakeyes7]

Never have I said that the government should be entirely done away with.

I'm saying it should only do what the constitution says it should and that means that it should stop fucking around with the economy and let the people decide where it goes with their wallets. All this push to make every car an EV by 20XX, for example, is not what a market economy does. Lobbying and public funding is also not a characteristic of a market economy.

If you let the government take over things like healthcare, you will just have a monopoly but worse because you have no choice but to pay the same rate even if you never use any of their services or else you will be thrown in a cage.

Oh and all this stuff about everyone fending for themselves, I also think there should be a police force but the police union needs to be done away with entirely. It has done nothing but keep bad cops in and good cops end up quitting because they refuse to enforce bad law, making the force immeasurably worse. I am also pro-2A because I support the right to defend yourself and others as cops can't be relied on to arrive on time to help.

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 As someone from a country with universal healthcare that's not what happens, ain't it odd how my country has better ranking healthcare yet it's not private? Ya know yours you also spend way more for? Completely delusional if you think UC is a bad thing.

It's funny how conservatives are all the same from US they think not having guns or somehow having UC will lead to Government becoming a dictatorship yet there is a vast sample of countries without citizens having guns, and UC living in a democratic society. Same old bad educated takes thriving in a outdated culture, you guys really need to get out more learn more about other countries.

Anyway I don't really have much more to say, the US government wants stability nothing more they aren't secretly plotting to use good systems to become some Stalin situation, in fact Stalin was the opposite of stable. China is probably the only real stable dictatorship, but China has a vastly different history, culture and many other factors that made it so. America couldn't recreate that even if it wanted too. Also China calls it's self communism but anyone who gets what it is knows China ain't it, and China only works thanks to consumerism the irony.

But yeah thanks for proving me right another conservative worried about the hypothetical.

[Snakeyes7]

Maybe you enjoy the monopoly that is entirely funded by extortion and it hasn't stabbed you in the back in other ways (yet). Good on you and I hope that continues working out for you, just keep me the hell away from it.

The difference between you and me is that not only do I not see the government as the jack of all trades, I also don't even trust them with scissors. All throughout history the government has done nothing but stab its own people in the back through blatant violations of our constitution.

Even when you don't count those or say that those are good things I have more. The US government extorts at least half of our paychecks to either launder money to countries for pointless endeavors like gender studies and fund wars we have no business being in (to both sides of the conflict mind you), investing in retarded studies like what monkeys do when given LSD and spend billions to build like four EV charging stations while Elon Musk can do it with a couple million at most. What do the US citizens get? Welfare programs to keep the poor poor by paying them to sit on their ass all day, social security which is a literal ponzi scheme and a week or two's worth of groceries in the event of disasters like a hurricane and for situations like Helene where people's homes are destroyed. Our disaster recovery program FEMA has even been caught picking and choosing who to save based on political affiliation and banned regular citizens from helping the victims get to safety.

[Snakeyes7]

And that doesn't even begin to count the number of bones I have to pick with them, that was mostly just from 2024 alone.

The whole point is to NOT become like the Nazis who did nothing but silence criticism, ban private gun ownership, constantly break in and search people's homes with no warrants necessary, threw millions of innocent people in prisons and death camps, etc.

Again, you might say "that'll never happen here" but it is happening in the UK right now. Violent criminals are being released to make room for people who make mean tweets, an offense like that is bad enoughto raid people's homes for it, the citizens literally need licenses to own a damn TV, next to no private gun ownership is allowed and self defense lands you in prison, they routinely shit upon the idea of due process. The UK is becoming Airstrip One by the month.

Do you see my problem here?

So go ahead and enjoy your security in exchange for your freedom while you still can, because in my opinion, you will end up with neither before long.

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 Nah England is pretty good maybe you need to get out more, go to other countries and actually ask the people living there.
Because once again you are delusional to even compare us to Nazis, it's offensive to Germany or any country that's had real dictatorship.
It's comparing apples to oranges. It's always a bad sign when one starts to pretend it's even comparable to that, like the idiots who say Trump is Hitler. Never a sensible argument.

Also I found this funny, TV licence is not needing a literal licence is own a TV...
Oh boy. TV licence is something that most people don't pay and never get into trouble for, and it's only a thing your supposed to pay for if you watch live TV. Not just for having a TV lol
Thinking this is a problem is absurdly funny as I can't think of a single time in my life have I ever thought about paying for it or caring about it.

Oh yeah I'll tell you when I am arrested for posting highly offensive memes in Facebook, I am sure that will happen ya know after being doing that since I was a teen.
And to no ones surprise I wasn't arrested. There has been some funny cases I'll admit that but in reality it's far from what 99.99% people experience. Then the 0.01% often get aquited, or even sue the cops and get tons of money so... Seems like a win in that case.

Anyway you keep paying for your healthcare and just pray that for whatever reason these health insurance companies don't ya know refuse your case. I am sure that's a much better system that has led to no problems, and totally wasn't relevant to something that just happened recently.

I do wonder what your reaction is going to be in the future which we are near when AI and robots are doing all work, and government will have to pay people a universal income to composate as there is just no jobs.
And if your thinking that won't happen, again I find you funny.

[Snakeyes7]

>Nah England is pretty good maybe you need to get out more, go to other countries and actually ask the people living there.

Tell that to the people who have been arrested and imprisoned for insulting someone in a tweet.

>Because once again you are delusional to even compare us to Nazis, it's offensive to Germany or any country that's had real dictatorship.

I don't give a shit that you are offended for comparing you to who you should be compared to. The Nazis ruled by race over merit on the basis that one race is the oppressor and must be overthrown, engaged in mass censorship and punished those who spoke out and were extremely big government. The far left acts like the Nazis in every way just in a different context.

You can laugh all you want about how it's not happening to you but the way it's going, it will happen eventually. Big government is always a mistake in my opinion because you will always get Nazis but they won't be calling themselves that because you'll be too busy depending on your government to wipe your ass for you to notice.

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 Imagine thinking I am offended. I never said that. I said it was offensive to Germany or any country that's had real dictatorship.
That does not = me offended. Lmao.
Way to miss the point entirely.

And oh I would tell those people but funnily enough they don't exist. Or it's all beens solved and they got a money pay out.
Where's the problem again? Oh yeah nowhere.

Aren't you done by now you've said your stupid point that only proved me right. But somehow you can't figure that out.

[Snakeyes7]

Even many Germans aren't falling for this crap. neither for Italians for that matter (pretending that Nazis and fascists are synonymous) because they elected a "fascist" for a prime minister.

>And oh I would tell those people but funnily enough they don't exist.

Bullshit. I'll give you an example a man named Tommy Robinson. He is a British youtuber who called out the government for refusing to go after the Muslim rape gangs and he ended up getting sent to prison for a 18 months. They tossed him because he was spreading "false information."

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 It literally don't take 1min to look up Tommy and see he's been known for Stalking a Woman, illegally entering US with a friends Passport, is in prison due to contempt of court, after committing slander towards a 15 year old kid, he's also done for assault ya know a Violent dude.

You use this guy as your role model and example that's funny. He's a textbook lowlife. His pattern of behaviour shows he ain't some normal lawfully abiding citizen who just made a post on twitter like you claim.

Honestly do stop. Your not funny anymore just absurd.

[Snakeyes7]

I never said he was a role model, I said that the reason for his prosecution is for a completely and utterly retarded reason like "spreading false information."

If he really truly did those things, then I agree he should be in prison, but it appears that he didn't piss of Keir Stalin enough up until he did his little thought crime.

Anyway. If you want to live in a place where you are absolutely fucked if the government decided to turn against you, go right ahead. Just don't force others to accept it too.

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 And like I said his prosecution wasn't retarded.
It just shows how little you know of what you speak trying to us him as an example lol.

You need help, If the government decides to turn on any people of any country, the people are always screwed that's how it works. Smh.

[Snakeyes7]

Unless you have a firearm and are able to form a militia, then your chances of success are far better.

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 Yeah cause I am sure the US government don't have military that's way more powerful with missiles to choppers and drones.
Thinking firearms is how you win against that is funny. How one successes over that is much simpler, numbers because a government can't work without a majority.

And then guess what you would have to put another government there that you have to then again rely on lol

[Snakeyes7]

It's millions of times better than having no weapon at all. Then the Nazis (they won't call themselves Nazis of course but you know what I mean) can return and there will be nothing you can do about it.

[Kaneki05]

@Snakeyes7 I just wanna know who said you can't have weapons in a communist ideology? Marx or Engels never said you couldn't have weapons anyway.
So that kinda puts this side tract to a moot point.

And yes you can do something about it. Once again only a majority needs to fight back and dictatorship won't last. Freedom fighters will win in the end. Humans are crafty you can find all ways to fight back if you really had to.
There is a reason why dictatorship try to scare people into fighting back and try to manipulate they are the good guys, because it's simple you lose control of the majority you lose.

[Avicenna]

You Marxists loved Elon when he was a Democrat. In fact, you love all billionaires who fund your totalitarian crime organization and set its agenda.

[Anonymous]

ah yes because voting for Kamala Harris would gonna somehow fix this, never mind that most billionaires voted for Kamala

only those who voted for Jill Stein get to claim that they knew all along

[OddBeMe]

Most billionaires didn't support either candidate.

[Opinion Owner]

most billionaires were supporting Kamala. some even got on stage to endorse her

[OddBeMe]

Prove it

[Opinion Owner]

do you want me to go down the list? starting with Taylor Swift, LeBron, Steph Curry, Jeff Bezos, Mark Cuban, Mark Zuckerberg, George Soros, Beyonce, Mike Bloomberg?

[OddBeMe]

Yes please prove most billionaires supported kamala over trump.

I already looked this info up and know the answer.

[Opinion Owner]

oh I'm sure you did look up the answer and found out that more of them supported Kamala over Trump but you won't post what you looked up. ironic, isn't it?

www.forbes.com/.../

www.ndtv.com/.../billionaires-funding-kamala-harris-and-donald-trump-in-2024-6778853

finance.yahoo.com/.../...ing-kamala-021100196.html

[OddBeMe]

801 billionaires in the US. 70 to 50 isn't "most" or even "more"

[Opinion Owner]

those 801 billionaires are based in the US. not all of them as US citizens, not that it matters because Kamala received far more funding for her campaign than Trump did and is still in debt

[OddBeMe]

I would imagine billionaires are able to buy citizenship. No? Because trump brought in a lot of immigrants with melania.

[Opinion Owner]

both sides have brought in immigrants whether legally or illegally. what does this have to do with more elites supporting Kamala over Trump?

[OddBeMe]

Thst billionaires are likely American citizens. And you were wrong, and can't admit it. The vast majority didn't support either candidate.

[Opinion Owner]

they don't have to publicly support either candidate when the campaign funds say otherwise. Google, Microsoft, CNN, MSNBC, NBC, FaceBook, Reddit, TikTok etc. all are overwhelming supporting Kamala

the elitist attitudes of the Democratic Party are obvious with feminists crying online after Trump's victory calling Trump voters incels and broke losers for not having a better job etc.

[OddBeMe]

So now it's obvious what people think. Mkay

[NYCQuestions1976]

You're a very bitter individual. Less drinking, more therapy.

[OddBeMe]

Funny you voted for the bitterist candidate ever

Not even dying Lincoln had as much victimhood as trump

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe The "bitterist"? Less drinking, more spelling lessons.

[OddBeMe]

When you run outta logic... argue spell check. I love you guys!

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe Logic and the left are opposites, and you haven't made any valid points in years. I need to entertain myself somehow. Less drinking, more critical thinking.

[OddBeMe]

If that were true we wouldn't be hated by simpletons.

[NYCQuestions1976]

@OddBeMe You and the rest of the far-left are the perpetual simpletons in all scenarios. You'd realize that if you weren't such a... well... simpleton.

[Yabbut]

She just got her feelings hurt by Elon.

[OddBeMe]

Uhg, women

[Filthy_Immigrant]

dude are you basing the views of ALL conservatives in the world on just one random Tweet you found online?

[beefcakebradybatson]

Better late to the party than missing it. RIGHT ON, MS. LOOMER !!!

[seeyounexttuesday]

Now you’re a fan of Laura loomer? Bahahhahaha

[OddBeMe]

I see how your cognitive ability led you to vote trump

[seeyounexttuesday]

And I see that you being an idiot made you vote Kamala.