I think we are. Russia has lost lots of soldiers, war equipment with their was on Ukraine.
23 Reply- 1 y
@Melanie31 Thank you for the Like
- 1 y
@Melanie31 Thank you for the MHO
Most Helpful Opinions
10.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The USA 🇺🇸 is
40 Reply
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
49Opinion
5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. USA by a lot, assuming nukes aren't involved and everybody loses, and also assuming this is in a vacuum in which the consequences of those two going to war wouldn't also drag everyone else in as well. A war with China would be much more difficult, and have much bigger long term ramifications even after an assumed victory.
That said, while the US would outperform Russia in a hypothetical conflict, it would likely embarrass itself in many ways in the process as the realities of it's lack of readiness and superficial priorities of the last decade are revealed. The military has poor leadership right now, and it takes years to fully turn that around - as in even if it's a fully committed priority of the next four years, the cancer still won't be totally gone, and a bad administration afterwards could undo the fixes faster. The saving grace is that basically every military on the planet is also struggling to maintain what they already have let alone new technology, and the corruption and nepotism in foreign militaries (Russia being one of the worst offenders, second only to China) means the US is still doing relatively well in this respect despite itself.
Whether deserved or not, the US Intel community is fully convinced that they've been overestimating Russia's military capabilities in light of the war in Ukraine. When I was in, a lot of our conventional force-on-force training was centered around the idea that Russia was much stronger than they've turned out to be, but the problem here is that the US government and military bureaucrats have a tendency to only commit to barely good enough solutions, often with no long-term plan, and will no doubt use the opinions of the intelligence gathered to justify idiotic decisions and diversions of funds. The fact that they still refuse to acknowledge that China is the much bigger threat even though it's obvious also doesn't sit well with me.
10 ReplyAmerica of course. I mean, what would you expect from Russia if even their Flagship the Moskva an Air-defence cruiser is sunk, after the Air defense systems didn't work, because the Money for Maintaining it was stolen and converted into a Mansion for their admirals, Generals and Politicians. You could correctly assume that it would be the same for their nukes.
If 10-20% of them work, that would be the upper limit with Moscow's super high corruption.
Sure the devastation in NATO countries would be enormous, but Russia would definitely get destroyed completely. Because America's (and France's and the UK's nuke DO work)
If Germany and Poland would want to, they could together built an army that would already have enough soldiers to kick Russia's A*s in a conventional war.
And that is even without Finland, Sweden, France and the UK helping.
The US would only lose if Elmo and Donald purposely hold the US military back and allow Russia to win.
20 ReplyAmerica, Russia, and China all know that America is top dog. This is why Russia and China both would use nuclear weapons instantly if they were to enter a direct conflict with the USA. You've already heard Putin wave threats around over Ukraine if America/NATO were to get directly involved. He's not joking. A conflict with the USA was already intensely studied by Russia and China to see if they could win, and they concluded that they would lose in every scenario except through nuclear warfare. This is why Mutual Assured Destruction exists... If we enter conflict with each other, they will use nukes, and if they use nukes we will use nukes. So it's best for everyone if we use diplomacy.
20 Reply1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Well why don't you look at it like this Ukraine is doing a very good job of holding their own and in some instances kicking the f*** out of Russia... But that's all I'm going to say... It's a little stuff like this that gets big stuff started
And you got to remember who Putin is Putin's a sore loser Putin would have his little finger on that little trigger at the red button and that would be so stupid that's why I'm glad Biden is that about he shouldn't even he shouldn't even be there right now you shouldn't have been there for the last past 8 months20 Reply1.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Today I am not so sure. I always thought the Russian people were stronger than America, seeing as they've survived a lot of stuff especially brutal winters even during wartime, but in today's world I really don't know. Russian men tend to be alcoholics and Russian women largely outlive them, so maybe they aren't as strong of a society as I would've once thought.
Plus both America and Russia are probably softer because we have so much ease in today's world compared to other nations still struggling.
10 Reply12.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Russia, of course. You have Russia vs the world in Ukraine at the moment and Russia is still fighting on. Whereas, Ukraine is going to pull an Afghanistan before too long.
America like the USSR needs to be broken up, and for the same reasons. It is a bigger problem than solution in the world. There are no more "evil empires" to be fought and it's more about "evil organisations" - for which the USA is useless against.
You cannot send in a multi billion warship and navy seal team to "fight" a multinational ring. But such an organisation can have a lobby group in the US senate to mislead and even arm such a groups.
11 Reply- 1 y
Hey idiot, go to the dentist once in a while. Your breath smells awful
we have the tech, we have the trained soldiers we have mostly officers who are expert were not going to constantly throw hundreds or thousands into wht called the meatgrinder like russia whos generals and political leaders dont care how many casualties we made mistakes mostly bu political decisions like LBJ, jimmy carter, and joe biden like his afgan debacle but push to shove if military leaders run a war we win and with us and nato air pouer i believe it would not take long and russia knows with the corrupt generals there nukes are in bad shape and if it uses one 10 countries will insenerate moscow
10 ReplyIs this a serious question? Ukraine has already basically killed Putin's Russia. If we showed up now it wouldn't be a war, we'd be putting the country out of its misery. Have you seen what the Ruble is worth right now because of this war? 0.0094 of one American dollar. That's less than 1 American cent.
31 Reply
1 yBecause many people want to see the downfall of America 🇺🇸 it should keep quiet and focus on calming itself instead of starting any fights. It’s a friendly reminder that mostly their daddy UK 🇬🇧 would join them and the rest of the boys will want at least one chance to punch big boy America. Clearly the UK can’t do much to save his boy as even it’s kid India 🇮🇳 has a better military than daddy UK so it’s support is more symbolic than useful. Can you believe even China 🇨🇳 would join the punching team with India despite the fact that it would refuse to hug India who wants to basically hug anyone and yet gets a tight slap across it’s face 😔
10 Reply6.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. If it went nuclear, the entire world would lose. In a conventional war, Russia would have little chance against NATO. They can't even conquer Ukraine. We can only hope that Russia's military leadership would not execute an order from Putin to use nuclear weapons.
33 ReplyAmerica is stronger than Russia, which is basically a Third World country (as was its USSR predecessor;all weaponry, no economy), but America is quickly crumbling (Trump will hasten the process!!!), and with or without Putin (which may come sooner or later, as Putin,72, is a citizen of a country in which men's average life expectancy is 66) and his b***h Trump, who's nearing 80 and is obese, both global giants could crash by 2035.
- 1 y
@beefcakebradybatson The US isn't crumbling but we have a lot of stupid policies that increase misery.
Don't kid yourself:America is imploding in large and small ways.
1 yIf ever those people from the US and Russia (and by extension their allies) were stupid enough to start waging a war against each other, there will be no winner: only loosers all over the world ! Amusing is that Einstein once stated he didn't know what the main weapon would be during the next world war, but that the one after that might be a plain club...
30 Reply5.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Usa vs the globe. Usa will always win. It would be an extremely shitty place to live anywhere in the usa but it will hold the line. We'd eat nothing but beans and rice till you puke but 5x more food anyone else got.
Still get the festive big dishes for holidays even if you celebrate it evenenly through the month and even steak for birthdays. It's not going to be so sugar sweet every day. Those rare treats will be attainable for majority of people.
20 Reply- 692 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yIt all depends on what side of the world you live on. One side will say they are stronger & the other will say they are stronger. On another note one might be stronger in some areas & the other might be stronger in different areas. Both are strong in their own way.
20 Reply 1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. USA can naval blockade Russia but Russia can't naval blockade USA.
Going by pure game theory USA would be the winner.
However resolve and persistence are also factors here.
Americans might grow tired of the war due to minor inconveniences like slightly higher prices while being heavily influenced by propaganda while at the same time any dissenting protesters in Russia get moved down by machine gun fire before any survivors get bayoneted.
Also Russia wouldn't go to war against USA without China and others but then again USA has allies of it's own.
I'd predict reds getting kicked back into their own territory but a occupation apart from certain historical territories like Kuril islands or Königsberg being seen as unfeasible.
Outcome: Minor allied victory.
10 Reply2.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Well I think both would lose if a nuclear war. Though having said that Russia's Satan 2 has only had 1 successful launch. There is a good chance a lot of them blow up in the silo or hit Moscow.
If it was a straight conventional war. my money is not on Russia. Soviet Russia was more competent.20 Reply11.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Russia is losing a war against a nation a fraction of its size, working with limited leftovers from the USA and nations that are just barely stronger than Ukraine itself. Shit, it couldn't even stop a column of its own mercenaries. The only reason it stopped is because prigozin stopped his column.
20 Reply- 1.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yUkraine is proving that the Russian military isn't so mighty after all in conventional warfare.
If the use of nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction is necessary, the Russian arsenal is indeed formidable.
However, I believe the American arsenal will eventually win over that of the Russians.
10 Reply - 4.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
u 1 yBoth Russia and the United states have enough nuclear weapons to maintain the infamous mutually assured destruction. The USA's conventional military is better organized and more sophisticated, Russia has more meat and dumb iron.
21 Reply- 1 y
1 yit would go nuclear and 2000 bombs would take off and 500,000 people would be dead in a hour in the is and russia as well as bombs sent to adversary countries. Then there would be a nuclear winter with estimates of 5,000,000,000 dying of starvation and perhaps the ends of the human race. some people like subsitance farmers in africa, argentina, and new zealand might survive. weather patterns would be chsnged for decades with tons of soot in the air.
30 Reply
1 yI feel the United States would win from military position. The United States have Naval and Air superiority, best technology, we also spend more money on military than any country, we have many military bases around the world, strong allies like Great Britain and Germany, well trained and have been in war situations in the last 30 years. There is a lot of YouTube videos to show why the US military is the strongest.
10 Reply- 6.9K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAmerica would win but you'd be licking your wounds for decades. Millions would die and millions more would suffer the consequences of war. It would be a paper victory nothing more.
23 Reply- 1 y
I just hope they aim at the West Coast, the way Japan did.
- 1 y
They'll hit the military sites first then the ports and economic centres. Europe would have taken out a fair number of their launch sites before it's destruction so you'd already be fighting a disabled russia. Statess with no strategic value would only see it on the news
- 1 y
Crap, I forgot that Fort Bragg is 60 miles away
680 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. In terms of economy, the US is stronger. We don't have to worry about Russia being #1 power. It's China we have to worry about, although I myself am not worried at all should they become the first super world power.
10 Reply- 3.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAmerica.
Bigger military, better weapons, BETTER TACTICS (no meat waves to get 1 million soldiers killed), better economy, more access to ports and the oceans wealthier, 330,000,000 people to 140,000 000.
10 Reply - 7.4K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 ywe'd both lose, russia lose worse.
Russia is being chewed up by Ukraine
America was chewed up by Vietnam.
We should not be fighting...
11 Reply- 1 y
The Russians lost about 2 or 3 times more in Ukraine within 2 years than the USA lost in Vietnam in 10
America will lose because they don't have the capability to attack Iran in the middle and they hesitating to attack Iran as they will have to run away from middle east. so how can they fight with Russia? russia had fought in ww2.
23 Reply- 1 y
What did you just say? lol how does any of that make sense?
- 1 y
You do realize the USA fought in WW2?
1.1K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Dont worry about Russia.. A combination of Russia and China will be that that destroys the USA.
China is key.
20 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)1 yThe world would be destroyed because they would both use nuclear weapons.
USSR had much larger army than Russia, so USA has the advantage in classic weapons, but Russia still has more nuclear projectiles.
30 Reply12.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Ukraine has weakened Russia. With conventional weapons, we would win. With nukes, everybody dies.
20 Reply
1 ySecretary of State In a conventional war, America would win. In a nuclear war, no one will win. Russia has 6000 nukes.
20 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)1 yAmerica is stronger militarily, but Russia has slightly more nukes. It would probably end in disaster for both countries, which is why neither Trump nor Putin are likely to risk an open war even if they do disagree on policy.
20 Reply- 6.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAmerica is stronger but Russia is strong enough to do a lot of damage too. In the end, we would all lose.
20 Reply America might be stronger but Russia is way more unpredictable when it comes to nucleair warfare. If they go to war with eachother it will be mutual annihilation
10 Reply
1 yAmerica would obviously win, but if Russia used nuclear weapons, they could cause very serious damage to America and its people.
10 Reply1.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. The USA would win by a significant margin, even in the current weakened state, including taking on China at the same time.
10 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)1 yDefine victory?
The US & Russia are currently fighting a proxy war in Ukraine and America has already won it.
20 ReplyNo one the world would be destroyed from nuclear warfare.
30 Reply
1 yRight now with our weak left military I don’t want to find out
31 Reply
Anonymous(36-45)1 yNobody wins a nuclear war, and the moment America or Russia creditably threaten the other's existence nukes will be used.
10 Reply- 5.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yMilitarily, the US. I mean, Putin had to ask NORTH KOREA for help with Ukraine😂
10 Reply
1 yBoth are very cunning , they will not fight with each other, but sell arms and instigate others to fight
20 Reply- 1.5K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAbsolutely. Although, maybe not for long if King Donald keeps bending over
10 Reply I don't know but America can't win wars.
it just makes it look like it won115 Reply- 1 y
What are you even saying? How does that make sense?
- 1 y
Well, lets be honest here.
The USA military ended its combat mission in Afghanistan in 2014.
The Afghan Government fought the war largely by itself until collapse in 2021.
The USA military ended its combat mission in Vietnam in 1973, and was fully withdrawn in March of that year
The South Vietnamese Government (ARVN military) fought for two years by itself without USA support?
How is the USA going to lose a war it was no longer militarily involved with?
and Syria? Last time I checked Assads regime just collapse out of nowhere?
- 1 y
Study History friend.
If you are going to make claims "The USA never wins wars"
Maybe actually study American military history?
You sound dumb. - 1 y
Also, according to you
I am certain you dont believe the USA even exists?
considering the USA can't win wars... clearly the USA never won its independence? - 1 y
Quite the contrary, the United States was very successful initially in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
In Vietnam, the South Vietnamese government was able to take over the war by itself, and through consistent aid from the USA defeated all NVA attacks. However, the USA cut funding to South Vietnam in 1974, and this dried its resources.
When the NVA launched their invasion of the South in 1975, there was no American aid, and the South Vietnamese government collapsed due to it.
This was a choice by the USA government at the time that was more interested in its own economic crisis than keeping promises to the South Vietamese Government.
This is why Theiu spoke about the USA as a government that went against its promises
In Afghanistan, the the Afghan Government had its more successful election in 2015 (with turnout higher than even in the USA).
However, there was a horrific amount of corruption that even led to the USA threatening to withhold aid. For example, in the USA government threatened to withhold aid due to the inability of the election of 2018 to define a winner. There were claims the Election was stolen..
The Ghani regime eventually became very corrupt.. to the point that much of the Afghan government surrendered without a fight.
This was all during an era the USA military had no involvement in AFghanistan against of occasionally bombing ISIS targets.. and took place over the period of nearly a decade. - 1 y
Well, "empty lands" is quite the opposite of what most would claim
If anything, im surprised you didn't claim we stole it from the millions and millions of natives that lived here.
However, you are right that American history is relatively young, and most people in the USA can naturally draw their "old history" back to Europe (for obvious reasons)
However, you seem very ignorant of USA military history
Nearly every war the USA military has fought has been a definitive American military victory.. even early ones when the USA was not a powerful nation. - 1 y
@Mettbltt lets take a look at your question then
"What does it matter if the USA is successful at first?
In the end, he could not achieve the deeds he definitely wanted."
You show your bias, because previously you claimed the USA starts wars to sell weapons.
Lets say you are correct, and that is the singular objective of the USA starting wars
Then yes, the USA achieved its objective? The USA military infrastructure made tons of $$.
Yes, I do know history quite a bit more than you. - 1 y
Okay BROOOOooo
I am merely showing
1. The Irony and contradiction of your claims... where you state "the USA failed its objectives".. but then not long ago claimed the USA starts wars to make money (which clearly happened lol)... Soo what is it? Truth is.. I think you want to go on an Anti-USA trip.. instead of dealing with actual history lol
and
2. That I am far more informed in history than you...
which is clear now since you want to leave the conversation lol - 1 y
lololol
551 opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. America Russia is weak and can’t beat Ukraine
10 Reply- 1.3K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 ySUA and China are the only 2 countries that can take down Russia.
00 Reply
1 yAmerica alone is nothing. Europe will stand by America. israel stronger than america :D
10 Reply4.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. Yes we are
Russian went through miltary equment
Most tge army is gone10 ReplyDon't think I want to find out tbh
310 Reply- 1 y
Surely China - they make decent quality tires)/tyres for a fraction of the locals 👀😋 I haven't gone back to other made since lol 😆
- 1 y
the Chinese phones, televisions, computers and fridges - I've been in heaven for years now - I even chucked out all my old South Korea. Consumer goods , went Chinese and haven't looked back at any other competitive brand quality brand since 🥳🙂🎉🫡
- 1 y
Phew. 🫡🎉 Ends my free rambling advertisement mock lol
- 1 y
- 1 y
Thanks and cya 😄
- 1.8K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAmerica. easily
11 Reply
1 yI hope they don't get into a war.
20 Reply- 1.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAmerica has the strongest military in the world. No one else even comes close to competing
00 Reply
1 yBoth are strong but I think the Usa is stronger right now
00 Reply
1 yI think America will win
10 Reply
1 yAll day and all night
10 Reply
1 ySorry I don't do politics.
10 Reply27.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic. America is stronger.
20 Reply
Anonymous(18-24)1 yWho ever misses the first intercepting nuke
10 Reply
1 yUS the Russian are struggling with Ukraine.
10 Reply- 8.7K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAmerica.
10 Reply - 8.6K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yFer realz? 🤔
10 Reply - 1.2K opinions shared on Society & Politics topic.
1 yAmerica
10 Reply - Show More (1)
Is the USA stronger or Russia?
Learn more
We're glad to see you liked this post.
You can also add your opinion below!
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
Most Helpful Opinions