
Dont do Facebook: So is their fact chdcking any good?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
We need some kind of truth system, a guage, which can be clicked to references for why rated that way.
and likely needs punishment association if people lie, deceive or falsify. just like in business. our nation depends upon it.
Otherwise, we are screwed...
Who determines what is fact. That's always the problem with government censorship and propaganda. I'm sure if the naxis had fbook they'd have called claims about nazi death camps as misinformation and instead referred to them as Jewish holiday camps.
Recently a woman was jailed in the UK simply for live streaming a riot happening outside her home, now she wasn't partaking or defending what the rioters were doing but simply reporting it.
Never used it. Someone keeps creating a fake account pretending to be me though. I had a couple removed.
I've only seen people do that to businesses if they want to rip them up in feedback. Someone did that to a local bike shop.
Win win
fact checking always turns into censorship and activis. it's never purely objective and without an agenda. cause people are people and algorythms are probably as prone to failure but for different reasons than people.
fake news is everywhere either way. we saw that when the fact checkers were still in place. i'm not saying fake news is great but it goes back to freedom of speech. freedom of speech is a joke if you can't say what you think, even what you think is fake and wrong. society is naturally gonna rectify it through discourse. so banning the conversation is the exact wrong thing to do it cause that's a breeding ground for tin foil hats.
it doesn't. it's always gonna be the ultimate tools for tyrants. in an ideal world, it may theoretically work. just like communism. but in the real world it doesn't.
you know that's exactly the reason the first ammendment exists. so that exactly that can't happen. and it neer should.
no it doesn't depend on who's doing the fact checking, cause corruption can not be corrected for and history showed again end again that eventually corruption creeeps in. that's why we should never touch free speech like that.
like i really envy your positive idealistic world view. i'm affraid it's not realistic tho. if you wanna be an idealist, great. i'm not. that's probably were we should agree to disagree on.
well the solution is critical thinking and civil discourse in my opinion. because once you decide to do censorship, you inhibit the processes that find truth. like once you ban civil discourse, truth will die. like even jfk would be in favor of not banning free speech. he died exactly because of trying to expose the forces who were trying to edit the truth in their own ways which is exactly what happens if we allow fact checking and censorship. the solution isn't to do it more. the solution is to expose it and stop it. which jfk tried and he died for doing the right thing. which in my opinion is very noble of him.
like look at ideas like flat earth. imagine the community of people thinking the earth is flat wouldn't be allowed to speak their mind and share their ideas. they could never spar their critical thinking ability and never learn that they were wrong. cause if their idea is just censored and forbidden, they will grow resentment and be even less accepting for actual truth. that's how minds work. that's how people learn. that's how critical thought works and if you ban that, ultimately you'll also kill critical thinking and that would be a great loss.
like there's always gonna be a flat earther who can't be convinced but that's not avoidable. forbidding them to speak their opinion would create more of them, not less.
nows and information is scarce? what? absolutely not xD
correct news and information is scarce but that's still better than not having information or news like people in past generations before the internet was around or tv and radio.
Opinion
2Opinion
I think you need to get your facts right on this one. The plan is to have the users confirm the facts. So for example if I post "Asians responsible for WW2." And it gets a lot of likes then you know it's true.
oh lord... whomever controlls ai training owns the minds of humanity.
get ready for mayhem.
i'm not sure that fact checking works. who says what facts are facts? i certainly don't trust most of the media, so where are you going to get your information to fact check?
God you lefties are morons. Every day I'm astounded at the stupidity.
I'd rather be stupid than not know I'm stupid.
@dustybiker2 Okay, but @seeyounexttuesday is not stupid, he seems like levelheaded guy
You can also add your opinion below!