What Trump missed in his speach and should consider?

[Ryan_BC]

[exitseven]

Trump's speech was really one for the history books. He was laser focused on the future but also gave an ample nod to the failed previous administration. He actually set the tone for the next 4 years. He let the country know that America will be great again.

I know that he did not write the speech himself but I am sure that he had more input than most presidents. He hit all the important notes. The economy, the border, taxes, and lawfare but then he shifted to a lighter tone in mentioning renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

He identified the natural order of humans. There are only two genders. He also talked about the end of DEI and is transitioning to hiring by ability.

He also showed his human side when he spoke of being almost killed by an assassin's bullet. It was a life changing experience.

The speech was long but it was not boring. I do not know what he could have added.

[Anonymous]

We should declare War on Canada, for too long we have suffered Canada's antagonist immigration and importation policy for the propose of aiding Mexico in the flooding our country with lethal drugs and dangerous foreigners.

We need to destroy Mexico too, but first we should secure our northern border so we can focus our forces on the more easily defended southern border against a more numerous enemy.

[Ryan_BC]

Your response is logically flawed for several reasons. First, you create a false dichotomy between diplomacy and war, assuming these are the only two options. This ignores the possibility of middle-ground solutions, like stronger border enforcement or enhanced international cooperation, which could address the concerns without resorting to extremes. Second, by taking the call for war literally, you misinterpret the speaker’s intent. It’s likely meant as hyperbole or an exaggeration to highlight frustration over serious issues like drug trafficking or illegal immigration, not an actual declaration of military action. Third, you rely too heavily on diplomacy and peace as the sole valid solutions, overlooking the fact that these approaches sometimes fail, and more assertive or practical measures might be necessary. Additionally, you overgeneralize the rhetoric by labeling it "extremely inflammatory" without addressing the legitimate concerns that fuel it. Not every call for stronger border security is extreme—there are many reasonable policy solutions in between. Finally, you fail to consider the context in which such rhetoric is used. Exaggerated language is often a tool in political discourse to provoke action and emphasize issues, not a literal call for war. In short, your critique oversimplifies the issue and fails to engage with the underlying concerns or consider alternative, practical solutions.

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

He needs to put price caps back on medicine so the prices on necessary, life-saving medication such as insulin doesn’t go back up to $6000 a pump

[dustybiker2]

He is stroking the wealthy groups back for supporting his campaign. It does nothing for him to do this. And the voters are worthless now. He doesn't care. Only the powerful have his attention, not the general population, and that wealthy group does not want caps.

[inked2014]

@dustybiker2 Thank You for being able to see through the bullshit of Trump.

[dustybiker2]

@inked2014 and same to you, sir. It isn't very difficult for those not afraid to think for themselves.

[Avicenna]

Ok, what did he say?