Earth would be better if 90% of the population was erased do you agree?

[ienjoylookingatgreen]

[genericname85]

"better" is a normative statements filled with a a bunch of values, opinions and views. before discussing those, an evaluation of "what's better or not" is worthless and agreement or disagreement to that doesn't give you any new information, cause you don't know why you're disagreeing or agreeing.

[KostasKouvalis]

I mean, in theory. Less population and more natural ecosystem is always better, so...

[ienjoylookingatgreen]

Agreed!

[Valdemort]

Depends entirely on the people you're erasing.
I think even 1% would suffice, if you pick wisely, lol.

[Syntosi]

Nature would be better. Humanity would be dead. Losing 90% of the population is an extinction level event.

[DrPepper12]

I'd settle for 75%. Wanna preserve genetic diversity. Cull the rest!

[ienjoylookingatgreen]

Nahhh no need for races that aren't white

[beefcakebradybatson]

All the dumb, bigoted folk and fugly or boobless broads, sure !!!

[gemb00]

Yes I do. It’s heavily overpopulated.

[ienjoylookingatgreen]

Agreed too many Indians

[MikeRJ]

I disagee.

[seeyounexttuesday]

No. How stupid.