If you AGREE/DISAGREE w/ people on an issue BUT NOT for the reasons the vast MAJORITY are stating & can only yes/no, do you contribute to convo?

This concerns a NYS PTA suggested questionnaire about the NYS phone ban in schools. The question to be put to parents, students & teachers is:

"What considerations, concerns, or suggestions do you have regarding a) storage of student devices during the school day b) consequences for policy violations, and c) how we can address differing viewpoints about the ban?"

The OVERWHELMING majority of responses NYSPTA has received so far is along the lines of "I need to be in touch with my kid during emergencies & family logistics ". Problem is it's a multiparty question with a binary choice!

The Q is about STORAGE & CONSEQUENCES, NOT how you feel about the new law. They are soliciting IMPLEMENTABLE SOLUTIONS that the communities can live with.

How do I say my opinion without endorsing or opposing this non answer? Why do modern parents need to project their anxiety & narcissism into EVERYTHING?

Yes. Binary choices allow no nuance.
No. It would lend credence to majority reasons.
Select gender and age to cast your vote:
If you AGREE/DISAGREE w/ people on an issue BUT NOT for the reasons the vast MAJORITY are stating & can only yes/no, do you contribute to convo?
Post Opinion