youtube.com/shorts/9MeNkqAmSdA?si=J5qGwhVs_Y7UTZV_
... they don't!
Yeah, boy! Take that democrats!!
"Dear white liberal, leave us ALONE!"
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News Of course not, but as everyone knows, the purpose, or motive for establishing DEI was never to help Blacks or any other demographic -- it's purpose was always to get people to dislike each other, so that they'd vote against one another.
I for one do not need to be pandered to and treated like a helpless baby. I say no to DEI.
In the US, yes.
Opinion
24Opinion
The main beneficiaries of DEI/Affirmative Action are white women. So why don't the critics mention that?
By the way, up to this time the primary beneficiaries had been white men. Here's an example:
Years ago I had a book about student life at Yale College. An impoverished white male student from a small farming village in Iowa was given a scholarship because of the school's diversification program. For 4 years he endured a long series of jokes about him being a yokel and a hillbilly. But he knew all those jokes were in fun and he had a great time at the school. He excelled as a student and graduated with honors. Now he was looking forward to a challenging but remunerative career.
He got all this because of the school's affirmative action program.
The year was 1880.
This story was not unique as impoverished white male scholars (such as from ancient Greece) were given scholarships to academies in Anatolia (Turkey), Mesopotamia, Persia, Egypt where they learned subjects that made their land into what is now regarded as the cradle of Western civilization. Without these diversification programs society as we know it would never have evolved as it did.
Society will and would have been fine. Successful and talented people always do well, if not in a company then on their own. They do need laws to protect them from discrimination and they also need those laws enforced. They do not need BS programs that hand them someone else’s job or place in a university. Asians and whites see this discrimination today but hopefully it is ending. Outrageously unqualified people have been given the slots of others who worked hard, have talent and the grades to prove it.
Bullshit program. Let's unfurl just the plane crashes from the past one year.
Then, getting to attend college is different. You get to gain the things needed for a job. You have to earn it with passing grades. How about that fella getting pushed aside for someone who didn't work four hard years for that chance?
@Pterodon
A couple of years ago liberal David Pakman spoke about this issue. When seeking a job he listed his ethnicity as Hispanic and did not get any replies to his resume. Then he changed it and identified himself as Jewish. Suddenly, he got 150 job offers. Check with his channel if you don't believe it.
As always it is not minorities who are benefiting from affirmative action. It is white women who are:
www.bing.com/search
@sachem. I’ll address it. Yes, in the early days of DEI they did benefit most. I saw many of them get promoted for just that reason but also they were the most qualified of the DEI pool… yes, they were. Even Asian Indians benefited a lot. Then about 2014 through 2018 things changed completely to a black and black female push. Then I saw truly terrible hires and promotions. People who were just a year ago were working retail jobs now in the corporate elite with no knowledge, skills or training and many times they could not clearly speak English, write properly or create and drive programs. It was like playing a piano concerto and then you hit a dead key… it was so obvious and embarrassing but still they received special awards for being… there.
The man in that video is correct. DEI is insulting to blacks, and anyone who isn't a straight white male, because it assumes they are all inferior to and less capable than straight white males. It implies anyone else is incapable of succeeding without the help of special laws and policies favoring them. I find it very insulting.
"Affirmative Action" was necessary after the segregation era. But after anti-discrimination laws were passed, blacks eventually became fully integrated into society. They are now equals even though some economic disparities remain.
Nobody looks at race in schools, work places or neighborhoods. Black celebrities are ubiquitous. Mixed relationships and marriages are common.
Blacks now have the same opportunities to get educated and find jobs as everybody else. For those who. can't complete, it's their own fault.
I don't support DEI for people who can't fit in or are unqualified.
Diversity, equity and inclusion aren't about handouts. This man is confused. DEI is about leveling the playing field.
Studies have shown that people who are hiring employees hire employees who are most like themselves.
When a hiring manager is white, they call back white candidates 66% more, often even when white and black candidates have the same qualifications. This is implicit bias. It takes a long time and concerted efforts to eliminate implicit bias.
And oddly enough, hiring managers of color do NOT have similar biases. They generally weigh candidates far more equally, studies indicate.
And various programs that support students of color and promote people of color into colleges and important positions at work have schools and workplaces that recognize a variety of voices and solve a variety of problems that workplaces that have no such programs and positive goals don't.
I have been in many corporate hiring meeting, unlike you I would think. It is flat out racism and sexism against white males. Just look at the hiring of Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court. Biden said he would only hire a black woman before she was even identified. That knocked out the vast majority of candidates. And she is a terrible judge. Plus she rambles as there was a study that showed she would speak 11,000 words on average when the most thoughtful and impactful judges on that court were speaking 1,000 on average. She is a total DEI hire and it shows. She was not the best to be selected. Biden could have insured a fair selection for the best but he didn’t because a black or a wouldn’t be selected so he made it mandatory. Sue is a sh! t judge and now we are saddled with her ramblings and chaotic thought processes. And deep down you know she wasn’t the best and you just don’t care but the country is moving past people like you.
To suggest that all non-white hiring managers are completely unbiased is pure fantasy. Maybe, @Screenwriter, you should try your luck with ones from India, in particular.
@Jersey2 It is not racism and sexism AGAINST white males. It is including others who were NEVER considered before. This may mean as a white male you are not the shoo-in you were in the past because you are competing with women and various minorities who were not in the running.
So, instead of 90 percent of workplaces being occupied by white males, it'll be more like 50%.
It has been very difficult for women and POC to get into corporate America because of bias and prejudice. White males have had a welcome mat for ages. The fact that white males' privilege is eroding somewhat is reverse racism or sexism. It is opening the door for everyone.
New voices carry with them new experiences and ideas and intelligence. Just because you think Katanji Brown was a bad choice doesn't mean all similar hires are or would be.
There are hires who look perfect on paper and in interviews who turn out to be failures, no matter what color, sex or ethnicity they happen to be. This always happens. DEI isn't perfect, but it is a start. It doesn't eliminate white males, it simply means they will, for a first time, have to compete with everyone else, and sometimes, they won't get hired because someone else is a better total package.
All you had to be before was white, male and qualified. Now there are a host of factors. And that's how it should be.
IS NOT REVERSE RACISM... the eroding a privilege is NOT REVERSE RACISM...
It’s always hilarious all of these “studies” people quote but NEVER cite their sources. We all know you’re full of crap when you do that. But by all means, keep making a fool of yourself.
Like I said, the country is moving past people like you, DEI is dead in many places but needs to die in most of not all.
Again, I have been in those meetings and it is patently discriminatory. I was told by one company, a large financial firm, that I would not be leading a department there but would be hired at the same salary as the manger. The manager would be a black male who was yet to be identified and I would train him to do the job as I had such jobs and higher level jobs before. I refused the offer. I refused the counter offer to pay me even more. I told them what their new black HR manager was instituting was patently illegal and that they need to confer with their Labor Lawyer. I left for another company for even more money and that HR manager was fired 3 weeks later.
I saw just as bad when I was hiring manager. You do not know what you are talking about. You speak as someone who only listened to academics and it shows badly. I saw peole get 3 promotions in 2 years, multiple black people. No they weren’t deserving as they didn’t have the ability, they were shoved up for DEI targets. Ridiculous, illegal and immoral.
Now DEI departments are being eliminated and DEI hires are being washed out because they are not performing. I have seen atrocious performers that are DEI hires. Tech companies just let go a large number of black women at the beginning of the year because it is okay to value performance instead of race and sex. I don’t think you will ever understand as you live in text books and academic papers instead of in the trenches up close to this. You want to hear the funny part, I have arm loads of significant Diversity awards that I have won.
DEI and programs like it are useless all they do is elevate people into positions or places they have no right being in. Whether it be in business or education. It only cares about skin colour no other factor matters to it when it comes to elevating people based on merit, intelligence, etc it is by far one of the worst programs out there.
Programs like that may have had a place back during the segregation era but now a days they have no place.
No one needs it. And it's insulting to suggest that qualified people do. DEI is about putting people in place because of their leftist politics and their willingness to push leftist agendas and narratives, not because they face discrimination.
Even the ones who think they do, don’t. They’re just too ignorant or lazy to look that gift horse in the mouth.
A cursory examination of long-term democrat strongholds shows that they have never solved any of the problems that they claim are their top priorities. They are always well above the national average for unemployment, homelessness, addiction and violent crime. People of color in the US are disproportionately affected by all of those things. If the democrats haven’t done anything meaningful for you yet, why would they start now?
"Black people" need better networking, relational skills, solid family units, good quality food and disciplined study and health habits.
they don't need dei which oddly mispelled is, die.
I think white liberals do need DEI... at this point...
They don't. The fact that DEI exists implies that those who think it is good think that minorities (except the "white adjacent" minorities) absolutely need the standards to be lowered because they cannot pass them as is. It is a very sugar-coated and corporate way of saying that they are too stupid to live up to those standards on their own and it amazes me how there are so many people who don't think this is insulting.
If they really wanted diversity, they can achieve it without forcing a quota.
DEI is 100% unethical and immoral. No one "needs" it.
People should be selected 100% on their talent, skills, merit, results... etc.
I'm fine with all white men being selected for positions or school admission or all Asian men or all women or all black women if those are the actual most qualified people. The smartest, the best performers, the best at doing the job.
No, if the Chinese in Malaysia can do good despite Malaysia government blatantly discrimination against them, then "Black" folks can definitely do good.. I guess the over 2 million "Black" millionaires or 7 billionaires didn't need "DEI".. Or the millionaires back in the day right out of slavery making money..
they dont.
unfortunately very few of them think like that man. then they wonder why they are stuck in the ghetto living life like this
Yes, because a century or two of being intentionally kept down needs to be addressed.
Legacy admissions, in particular, are anti-DEI; your parents might have been able to afford to go to university, but a far smaller percentage of black people's parents could.
Black people and immigrants are just a political tool to the Democrats. None of my black friends needed that shit
America was better when segregated, blacks had their families, businesses and werent dependent on white handouts. Now they have 'black owned' this and that and are discriminated by other races in employment.
Nah, it segregation would have ended one way or another.. Business absolutely hated it.. What messed a lot of "Black" people up was that hard times fell, and they started relying too much on the government and going deeper into "Redneck culture"..
@Joshydavid25 Yeah they started eating out of the white mans hands. Became dependent on the State which neutered the communities meanwhile having their children mass slaughtered to Moloch
I don't know about the "White" man, but uh definitely the government.. But I generally agree.. Also the race grifters did a number as well.. purposely causing division..
@Joshydavid25 for eg: Rather than drinking from their separate water fountains they wanted the white peoples, now they are dependent on whats allowed, meanwhile being used for votes. Communities decimated by highway systems, white flight, poor economic areas. y'all gotta do as the jews and keep the wealth in black hands and not give it back to those keeping your people under their thumb and regulating your population growth via 'womens choice'
I just think it's because unfortunately we've developed a broken culture that's more reliant on the government, and trying to be the opposite of what they think "The White Man" should be that this is the result.. Practically being low down moochers always looking to get one over on somebody with nasty, evil behaviors and habits..
Both parties practice racism towards blacks, just differently
No. We ALL do. The wisdom of the crowd works best when diversity of background & opinion is a factor. This is beyond dispute.
That should be achieved naturally, not with the liberal input of equity. That ensures EVERYBODY gets fucked! Which they know and are fine with it. The white liberal has a suicide type of flirtation with their race. That's their problem, not ours. ANYTIME you have to cause destruction upon another to make gain for one or many is fucking wrong. Buy I don't expect you to agree. The liberal mind loves to cause unrest. Look at the zombies in LA.
It's insulting to imply that they do.
No they don’t need DEI
Well considering DEI is illegal in the US; perhaps businesses should stop doing it or repeal the Equal Employment Opportunity Act.
Yes because of their inferior abilities, Black folks need an extra boost to have opportunities. Otherwise, DEI wouldn't be needed.
We need an honest opportunity like everyone else.
Yeah I think so. They hang on to affirmative action
DEI does them no favors.
Anyone who’s not a white, straight male needs DEI.
And again, an attack and shaming of the white, straight male... seems to be a common theme for the far left. They even implemented their radical CRT in workplaces, mandating white employees sit through it to be critical of their own race.
Oh no! Someone’s offended! 🙄 I’m simply stating facts. If you’re a white straight male, you don’t what discrimination is like. You don’t know what it’s like to be a woman and/or a minority. Your argument has no basis. So, if you feel attacked, feel attacked. Go cry in a corner and suck your thumb. I don’t give a DAMN. Good day. 😊
I know exactly what discrimination is like. I have experienced first hand, 25 times in the workplace when I was fired for my social deficits. I live at my parent's home at age 30 and can barely afford my car and my old RV. Don't tell me I don't have my own struggles.
She’s talking about actual systemic discrimination based off your race, gender, or sexuality.
And you, Jaz, don't know what it's like to be a man! So go scream all you want. You at least don't have to deal with crazy females.
And, how dare you say that a man doesn't know what it's like to face discrimination! That shit occurs to individuals, and there is NOT a "privileged" group!!
And while we're at it. The white male has been the target of EVERY other group in America since the early 90s. We are the ONLY group Unprotected by the thought police! It has not had much notoriety because AS a man we don't cry, bitch, and moan to whoever will listen. We conduct ourselves AS men and carry on with our responsibilities!!
That fella is full of more crap than you.
If they need DEI, they're not worth any positions.
As long as there’s racism in the country, yes.
Yes and I’m black too so what’s your point.
@dongie professionally offended and entitled: that is all they are ever good for
Define DEI
Fairness and equality means that everyone has a fair chance and an equal opportunity. Fuck equity? You’re against people having fair access and opportunity? Also you never defined DEI.
What? This is not a communist country, and people get breaks in everyday life. That doesn't mean the government has the right to start leveling the playing field three quarters of the way home and casting the qualified into the trash bin in order to catapult a possible slacker ahead of the game. You probably think Coke was right when they told white people to try to be less fucking white too don't you? Read between the lines to find I know the stupid definition of the three little words put together in a liberal think tank. Either understand what I say or back up and drop it. I don't expect you to agree with me, and I hope you're savvy enough to know I'll NEVER agree with your very discriminate position.
There is a distinction between equality and equity.
Equality means allowing the same opportunity regardless of protected class.
Equity is an extension upon equality that provides handouts, assistance, and accommodation in an attempt to boost certain people up to the same level.
This is fine for people that need reasonable accommodation due to a handicap or legitimate disability, but it is "affirmative action" in disguise for anyone else, especially for reasons related to skin color, ethnicity, or race. We don't owe anyone handouts because of their race.
Diversity and inclusion is fine, except for hiring or emphasizing someone's race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation for employment decisions.
We shall be hiring and welcoming people based on their merits, work ethic, and skills rather than on a basis of race, sexual orientation, or gender which shall be irrelevant in most cases.
If a religious institution doesn't want to hire someone with another faith or ideals that violate their religious beliefs, they shall be able to do so. Same situation for the cake baker and the web designer. No one shall be forced to violate their own religious beliefs or convictions of faith to accommodate someone else!
So the government shouldn’t try to level the playing field for disenfranchised groups?
"Disenfranchised groups" lol... you sound like one of those "microaggresions" people. Fuck no! The government needs to stop socially engineering and keep their fucking hands off! Thank God I don't have to sit through another CRT session in a workplace again where I am told I am "privlaged" and supposed to feel ashamed because I am white. I have my own damn problems! So I am supposed to feel bad for someone because they aren't white? Yeah right!
I mean you’ve proven yourself to be a racist so I really wouldn’t expect you to feel bad for anyone unless they’re white.
So we are supposed to "feel bad for you" and have pity? So you are wanting a pity party? A pity party is the answer you say? How about taking personal accountability and responsibility.
Whites and civilized nations have tried to help people in Africa. As a whole, blacks have proven they cannot do anything on their own
🥱 If there are systemic barriers that black people and people of color have to face then they should be taken down. I really don’t give a fuck what you feel personally.
What barriers? You have opportunities to behave, become educated, and have opportunities for yourselves. You have the ability to go places, have homeownership, travel, and buy things you want. If you behave and make the correct decisions, there should be no issue. There are racists. They exist. Tough! Not everyone is going to be receptive of anyone. There are avenues. You just want to complain about the few who aren't tolerant.
The situation is this, everybody has experienced racism and everybody has treated another in a racist manner no matter how small. If you say you haven't, you're lying to yourself. The only ones who benefit from it are POC. That's why so many carry that race card on speed dial. The term Racism has been used to death. It's the go-to word for far too many assholes that want a free ride off the backs of the ones that do not benefit from the word. You should remember ACE. There are always at least two sides to everything.
Do you understand there’s a difference between systemic racism and someone calling you a cracker online?
Pushing this whole narrative of "systemic racism" is the motivation of woke policies. They are harmful overall, and draw more attention to race. It is counterproductive.
I mean fuck, we didn't have these issues prior to the Obummer era. The Obummer regime really inflamed all this and we have never been more polarized. This is regressive, not "progressive".
Systemic racism has been talked about for decades what the fuck are you talking about? The only reason you think race issues were inflamed during and after Obama is because racists like yourself couldn’t handle having a black president. 😂 If Obama created race tensions by simply existing then that’s the result of people like you not him.
No, the use of the race card became more prevalent. They like to hurl "racism" for just about anything now. Disagree with a leftist policy, then you are a "racist". The left has really created a snowflake culture and victim mentality.
... you have to remember, there are blacks and then there are n*ggers. N*ggers like to be loud, arrogant, aggressive, inconsiderate, complain, be victims, and act like thugs. Nobody wants to. be a N*gger.
Well like I said you’ve proven yourself to be racist so you can’t use the “liberals call everything racist” card
Stereotypes exist. Just like if you were to go to rural trailer park country with an above-ground pool, a swingset, and a broken down rusted truck in the front yard.
You can choose to be an entitled n*gger or a black guy. I would choose the latter.
Why are you censoring it 😂say it with your chest
GAG will censor it automatically
Correct!!
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions