Who would you rather have babysitting your children? The Ayatollah of Iran with a nuke, or a law abiding citizen with a gun?

[mfused411]

[Screenwriter]

Neither. But what's a babysitter doing with a gun?

If it's only for a few hours, maybe that old dude, Ayatollah, WOULD be OK. At least he doesn't have a gun. I doubt he'd be prosletyzing if the kid were asleep.

But ultimately, no guns brought to my house, and no religious commentary. Just diaper changing and counting and cartoons or kid shows or G movies.

[mfused411]

You are clueless.

[Screenwriter]

I own the only gun in my house. A shotgun for duck hunting. It would be locked away if there were a child in my home.

No one coming to my home would bring in a gun No one coming to my home would be spouting their personalk religious commentary along with their babysitting. Period.

Nothing clueless about that. I have my boundaries and people in my home will respect them or not be here.

[mfused411]

Holy crap.

[Screenwriter]

I know you're trying to be cute by saying it's better that an American with a gun babysit your kids than the Ayatollah of Iran because of freedom and democracy and gun ownership and all that.

It's not that simple. There are people who follow Islam who aren't closed-minded, theocratic idiots, just as there are gun owning americans who are closed minded as well..

[mfused411]

How dumb would you have to be to think he's going to bring his gun to the babysitting job? 😂😂😂😂

[Lliam]

A law abiding American citizen with a gun, of course.

But I'd rather have the Ayatollah than a baby-killer Israeli. They would claim my house was theirs and murder my family if I disagreed.

By the way, Iran doesn't have any nukes. The Ayatollah declared a fatwa against their development years ago and hasn't lifted it because he thinks fire bombing civilian populations is immoral.

Israel has nukes, though. And they are eager to fire bomb defenseless women and children. They do it every day.

[overlord337645]

a law abideing citizen with a gun why you might ask well quite simple you never said who so i am free to choose someone i trust as for the people in iran no offense to them but im not sure i would let them babysit till i got to know them besides who said the child was on a hit list anyways?

[purplepoppy]

No one has ever killed anyone with a nuke since 1945 but since 19

[mfused411]

Multiple choice questions are difficult for stupid people. But you tried.

[Avicenna]

Leftists want Khamenei to groom others‘ children while they trans theirs.

[blackeagle007]

I think ur too fat to be on gag

[mfused411]

My question was about how anti-gun people can be pro-nuke? You should watch the movie I hinted about. "Law Abiding Citizen.'"

Two thugs murdered his family, and that didn't work out well for the thugs.

[blackeagle007]

Ur still too fat to be here

[Avicenna]

@blackeagle007: I don‘t know who that was directed to, but you need to take your meds and get back to your insane asylum.

[Avicenna]

@mfused411: I think you’re assuming more logical thought on their part than is actually the case here. The most likely explanation is that they are for whatever Trump is against, regardless of the consequences.

[mfused411]

Spot on!

[AviatorTom]

How about NEITHER. My kids' grandmothers were our usual babysitters, the way it should be.

[mrkdvsn]

We have no kids. But if we did, obviously a LACWAG

[FunkyMonkee]

Citizen.

[DCVsMarvel2]

The nuke, of course, more powerful

[blackeagle007]

The aytoliya is fag. But so is Trump

[Pterodon]

Citizen with a gun