Is NATO just a club of scared bitches/ pussies banded together as a collective deterrent to USSR or is it just another form of 'western supremacy'?

[QuestionObsession]

NATO was supposedly founded as a collective military deterrent to the Soviet Union/ USSR. Because the USA convinced European countries that USSR was a wild beast that could eat any of them alive. However, when the Soviet Union collapsed, NATO did not disband. In fact, the USA kept inviting more countries to become members.

If the Soviet Union was the advertised reason for forming NATO, why was it not disbanded when the USSR collapsed? Why did they keep adding more members?

This 'collective defense' against USSR was formed on the condition that IF any NATO country was attacked by USSR, then it would be considered an attack on all NATO members and they would retaliate collectively.

But again, USSR fell and the new Russian Federation has never attacked any NATO country. Which means NATO military should have been inactive and dormant ever since its founding. But as we know NATO military has been deployed on aggression missions all around Africa and Middle East.

The 9/11 WTC attacks orchestrated by Israel in the USA and pinned on the Middle East is the only outside 'attack' on any NATO country. But besides the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq by the USA using NATO military, there have been plenty other deployments of NATO military under the guise of continued 'war on terror'.

If NATO was formed as a deterrent to USSR/ Russia, why was NATO military used for the made up 'war on terror' which had nothing to do with Russia? Why was NATO military used against the Middle East which is not part of Russia?

And the biggest misuse - Why was NATO military used in Libya during the Gaddafi unrest? Libya never attacked any NATO country and neither is it part of Russia.

The UN Security Council passes military action resolutions against weaker countries and the military they use is NATO. What has the UN got to do with NATO? And 2 permanent members of the UN Security Council are non-NATO, so how can they vote to pass resolutions to deploy NATO military anywhere?

[Lliam]

I agree with everything you said. You summed it up well.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, NATO has been used as a tool for western expansion and U. S. empire. It is used for aggression, not self defense and deterrence against aggression.

[jshm2]

LOL, it was just a US guns club scam all along. We saw that with the ass pounding Iran gave them. This despite them snitching the names and addresses of people to assassinate in Iran to Israel.. but still losing.

[purplepoppy]

Look at a map, Russia is huge, most NATO countries are tiny. Of course they band together, its not being a pussy it's being sensible.

[QuestionObsession]

@purplepoppy sensible colonial imperial hegemonic strategy. Correct 👍🏻

[goaded]

Oh, you were doing so well until "orchestrated by Israel in the USA".

[goaded]

That, and the obvious fact that Putin wants Russia to be the USSR or Russian Empire again. The threat didn't go away, it just concealed itself.

[QuestionObsession]

So it is alright for the genocidal Israelis to fantasize about a 'Greater Israel' but not Ok if Putin wants to expand his 'mother Russia'?

And the 9/11 WTC attacks were orchestrated by Israel, everything from planning to training some Arabs as pilots. Even the CIA had admitted that it was orchestrated over their heads. It was how 'terrorism' was made a mainstream commodity to demonise all of the Arab world.

[goaded]

No, it is not "alright for the genocidal Israelis to fantasize about a 'Greater Israel'". Where did you get that nonsense from? It's not OK to invade other countries to take their land.

The rest is bullshit, too.

[In_Trance]

Yeah pretty much.

I think if nobody ever heard from them again the world wouldn't be a different place

[FunkyMonkee]

I always thought that's what the left were!

[Pohjolan]

Oh its you. Tell me what happened to MH17?

[QuestionObsession]

It got a makeover

[Pohjolan]

@QuestionObsession
Will your handlers get upset if you write that it was shot down by Russian armed forces?

[QuestionObsession]

@Pohjolan I am not Russian so, probably not. Cheers

[Pohjolan]

@QuestionObsession
Oh they don't employ native russians only nor was that a definitive no.
So can you call a spade a spade?
Is the Russian Federation responsible for shooting down MH17?

[Pterodon]

Troll

[QuestionObsession]

You trolling me yes