Because they want to see their kids grow up. It's not for their own safety, it's for the safety of their family. Have you ever heard the saying don't shoot the messenger? There are plenty of stupid people who blame the messenger. If you don't like immigration law, maybe you should try to change the law. If you don't like grocery prices, do you just shoot the employees at the grocery store? Why are people so stupid? I won't tell you the name of the developer, or the name of the app, but a certain news channel that rhymes with CNN, is promoting an app that helps warn the illegals of an ICE raid.
They are in done cases. It turns out that these crazy leftists are now targeting the minor CHILDREN of ICE agents and harassing them. We have to protect them from the illegals’ storm troopers.
The same reason the law in Mexico wear masks, so the cartels don't know who they are so they can't hang their, or their family's mutilated corpses, from a bridge.
@goaded I don't agree. If they know who you are you and your family would be in jeopardy, as has been shown in Mexico time after time when they or their family members have been killed by the cartels.
In Mexico they are going up against drug cartels, in the US they are kidnapping students, street vendors, and people who turn up for their appointments in immigration court.
who said this: “The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. They care about their lives, don’t kid yourself. When they say they don’t care about their lives, you have to take out their families,”?
@Sabretooth President Trump said this about the Taliban. The story goes that he had pictures of where the heads of the Taliban lived and he made them a deal they couldn't refuse.
yeah? he also said that he ended Iran's nuclear dreams... for a few months, at least as we've all learned. it's funny, y'lnow? this is the exact type of shit that y'all criticized Biden for. ultimately, you gotta again decide just how much Trump's word means to ya
@Sabretooth Biden was criticized because he failed at everything. He failed to keep prices low, he failed to keep illegal aliens out, he failed dealing with foreign countries and he failed at rolling out the covid vaccine that his predecessor had left him.
yeah, and Republicans did everything that they could to keep it that way... as we all remember the baby formula issue. Biden deported more people: Biden's first term: President Biden focused on enforcement at the southern border and utilized expanded powers under Covid (Title 42) to conduct approximately 4 million deportations. Trump's first term: President Trump conducted 1.9 million deportations in his first term. Biden's reliance on Title 42: Title 42, a pandemic-era expulsion policy, was a significant factor in the higher numbers under Biden. This policy allowed for the rapid expulsion of migrants at the border, though the expulsions weren't considered formal deportations. Differences in focus: Trump's policies generally emphasized internal enforcement (targeting those already in the country), while Biden's focused more on those encountered at the border. Overall deportations (including expulsions): Some figures suggest Biden's total repatriations (including deportations and expulsions) surpassed even those of the George W. Bush administration's second term.
here's a few key area of Biden's successes: Strengthening Alliances: Biden prioritized rebuilding relationships with traditional allies and partners, particularly those in NATO and the Indo-Pacific, which were strained during the previous administration. This included initiatives like the AUKUS security partnership and enhanced cooperation with Japan and South Korea. Support for Ukraine: In response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the Biden administration provided significant military and economic assistance to Ukraine and rallied international support to impose sanctions on Russia. Engagement with China: The Biden administration pursued a complex approach to China, balancing defensive measures like restricting access to sensitive technologies with diplomatic engagement. Efforts were made to strengthen alliances in Asia as a counterweight to China's influence. Addressing Global Issues: Biden rejoined the Paris Agreement to address climate change and emphasized multilateralism and international cooperation to tackle global problems. meanwhile, you now got this, again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fHZODxddwo . as for the shot... let's not pretend that Trump and his allies didn't spend all that time trying to fear-monger about the vaccine.
''Whether Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers can refuse to enforce a presidential order depends on the nature of the order and the specific circumstances. General Principle of Obedience: ICE is a federal law enforcement agency within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). As an executive branch agency, ICE is generally required to obey presidential directives and department directives issued by the DHS Secretary. Failure to comply with a lawful order could potentially lead to disciplinary action, including loss of employment. Potential Grounds for Refusal: Unlawful Orders: Officers are not obligated to follow unlawful orders. For example, an order violating the Constitution or contradicting established law could be refused. Ethical Concerns: While not a formal legal basis for refusal, officers might face ethical dilemmas and choose to challenge or refuse orders that they believe are morally wrong, though this could still have career consequences. Department Head Disagreement: Department heads, like the DHS Secretary, serve at the pleasure of the President, but they can still disagree with White House orders and risk being fired, as illustrated by a previous instance where an acting Attorney General was fired for refusing to defend an immigration order in court. Contextual Considerations: Sensitive Locations: To enter "sensitive locations" such as schools or places of worship, ICE generally requires a judicial search warrant, meaning they wouldn't enter based on a general presidential order without specific legal authorization. Recent Supreme Court Decisions: The Supreme Court has limited the use of "universal injunctions" that blocked executive orders entirely, potentially giving the administration more leeway to implement policies. However, this does not mean all executive orders are immune from legal challenge.
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Most Helpful Opinions