What's it with all the Ahmerican gun lovers not liking their fetish being brought up and challenged?

[Shiprex]

I don't know but the gun nut community on GaG is pathetic. Can't make a case FOR guns because they're ignorant of how less corrupted world has dealt with giving civilians the idea they can kill someone who scares them.

They post idiotic claptrap that anyone with a brain can see their obsession has been forced upon them through the gun lobby taking control over the governance and media selling a paranoia that takes them to the edge of mental illness. In fact the very notion of WANTING to have a firearm to use against civilians SHOULD be enough to deem you unfit through mental instability to be allowed near one.

[BadApple69]

Who the fuck are you to tell us what our constitution say and what it means. I am sure you know there is a comma in there. The comma separates the two ideas. Kind of like a list.
At the picnic we had hot dogs, and hamburgers. See the comma? That means the hot dog is not a hamburger but 2 different things.


“The right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”


Yes it’s true we need a militia too. We call them the national guard these days.





A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infri
nged".

[Shiprex]

Lol they're NOT separate though in the same sentence.
The burger and hot dogs are goid at

[Shiprex]

Food at the picnic not different.
The militia, as a well regulated armed civil populated group ARE the concept.
Infants in grade school could tell you that.

[Shiprex]

The National guard isn't used to protect states against the government though.

In your own words
A. A WELL REGULATED MILITA = the subject of the following clauses
B. BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE=the purpose of the subject (first stanza)
C. THE RIGHT 9F THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED=who constitutes the subject (i. e., WELL REGULATED MILITIA )
The lesson in English for today is delivered. If you have any critical thinking skills you can put A, B & C together and formulate a coherent concept the authors had when they worded it that way

[Shiprex]

~Food

[BadApple69]

@Shiprex you know nothing about our constitution or our history. Everyone was armed during the creation of our constitution and none of the founding fathers would have wanted some asshole (like a leftist) to change that. The idea was if a tyrannical leader (like a leftist) came along they can’t disarm the populous and the tyrannical leader would have to fear the populous. The leftist hate that….. which is why it’s written into the constitution.
The second amendment because besides free speech it is that important.

[Shiprex]

LOL the cockwomble who paid his way to enter the whitehouse is the very thing you clowns seem incapable of recognising as an ACTUAL TYRANT. Sending in the military to cities that didn't vote for him using lies to justify it to the cult idiots following him.
2A is there as a WELL REGULATED MILITIA not a bunch of hooray Henry twits with more waistline than IQ tooled up like they think they're Rambo. Too much TV for the lot of you.

[BadApple69]

@Shiprex so please tell me, what country are you from?

[Shiprex]

A country that places the value of life above that of property or paranoia (you can't kill someone for stealing something or for allegedly scaring you).
A place where defending yourself requires an actual attack and not a fear of attack. Where lethal threats are determined by the law and not an untrained, unauthorised or unqualified citizen.
You kill someone who entered your house uninvited you go to jail for manslaughter.

[BadApple69]

So where is this amazing country? Tell
Me

[Shiprex]

Anywhere but America where the waves and surfing can't be matched.

[Anonymous]

People tends to prefer to keep their fetishes private.

This question is a obvious reference to the leftists who believe Trump always lies and therefor are true believers he lied in this clip here

https://www.youtube.com/embed/30E5P12DVEk

Since they believe he always lies, keyword always meaning no exceptions especially not this clip because goddarn do they deserve to be the targets of the question!

Speaking of airing their fetishes, here is some pro tranny lolicon whining about transphobes due to his fetish for people pretending to be the other gender https://xcancel.com/cnuylover59/status/1956336809132306895#m

Nasty disgusting leftists.

[Shiprex]

No he lies and is good at it because he mixes it up with half truths, truths, obfuscation, distraction, deviation thus confusing his followers as all con men do.
Those paying attention don't fall for it and challenge it. The cult though, can't parse the truth and fiction so easily and want to "feel" like they get it because the rhetoric used feels like it's at their level, simplistic buzz words and catch baseless phrases.

[Opinion Owner]

Yes, they believe he always lies so that means they believe he lied in that clip too. The keyword is always. Either these leftists must be included in who this question is about or or inclusion is not important enough to need to see Right wingers included so we can exclude Right wingers from being the people airing their fetishes.
Nasty leftists airing their fetishes even use the month in June to air some of their fetishes.

You should like my answer because its the truth.

[Shiprex]

You didn't read what I wrote. You have a misconception that I tried to clear up with a reasoned logical explanation but you're not interested in learning only pushing your bigotry.

[Opinion Owner]

I read you believe he is lying. Does not chsnge that fact that there are leftists who believe he always lies so, ans therefore believe he lied in that clip about guns. The type of leftists who dislike having their fetishes challenged. Is this question about you yourself perhaps?
You wrongly claim I didn’t read what you wrote (I did) that I am not interested in learning (I am interested in learning and I hope other people give insightful answers about these leftists) and nit supporting them is apparently "pushing bigotry" in your opinion.

[Anonymous]

The president is taking hundreds of guns away from criminals and the anti-gun people are mad about that now. Yet, a mentally ill person killed children last week and the same people are mad at the gun, not the lack of medical care of mental illness. But if the president had taken away his gun, the same people again would have thought that was bad. If there were no guns, the mentally ill person would have killed even more people by running them down with his car, which we see in Europe, a lot.

[exitseven]

Crime is increased tenfold since 2020 and they are mostly street crimes and other violent crimes. People cannot depend on the police. Many cities have defunded them and morale among police officers is at an all time low. People own firearms for protection and they have a right to use them to defend themselves and their homes.

[Dargil]

Amendment two of the constitution is the reason to have firearms. No other defense or debate is needed. That includes this post. Enjoy your whine.

[Shiprex]

It's the APPLICATION from bad and corrupt interpretation that's at issue. Where in 2A does it say you can shoot protesters? Where is the authority to Shoot people YOU PRESUME are criminals?

[Syntosi]

I have always been confused by this approach. Why? Because the founding fathers not only intended the constitution to be rewritten continuously to keep up with changes in society but also because you are very obviously giving up on any actual argument in favor of WHY we should have a right to guns.

If we for the sake of argument would change the 2nd amendment, would you just go "ah well okey then! I guess its illegal now and there is no other defense or debate needed"?

Fucking weak sauce.

[DrPepper12]

You ammosexuals are so fucking ignorant of context

[Shiprex]

@DrPepper12 👍👏👏👏

[Anonymous]

Yeah, I can't imagine why American gun owners would laugh at being called "pathetic idiots" by a "man" from a country where men have no testicles anymore.

[Shiprex]

More racist dogma from the anonymous pathetic gun lover

[Opinion Owner]

Right, I support gun rights so I must be racist. Makes perfect sense... if you're a dumbass libtard.

I truly feel sorry for the "men" of your country.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Have you tried crying about it on the internet? That seems to help. Last thing I want is the lunatic left telling me what I can and cannot do.

[Shiprex]

The paranoia is strong in this one.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Oh you want absolutely no additional gun legislation? Perfect.

[Shiprex]

Better not misinterpret legal terminology to allow civilians to be judge, jury and executioner.

[seeyounexttuesday]

Nice dodge.

[Panthero80]

They will cite the second amendment of the U'S. constitution.

[Shiprex]

Wrongly interpreted as the "WELL REGULATED MILITIA" seems to be omitted in their claim to "need" lethal force against other citizens.