The British government has just fired Lord Mandelson the Ambassador to America because of his creepy letter to Epstein.
Now it's my belief that it's one thing to know someone who's a bit dodgy. It's another thing entirely to associate with them. Any police officer will tell you that associates of criminals are always criminals, they just haven't been arrested yet.
Thoughts? Do you believe in guilt by association? Do birds of a feather flock together? I do and I believe everyone of Epsteins friends should be taken in for police interrogation.
“The British government has just fired Lord Mandelson the Ambassador to America because of his creepy letter to Epstein.“
Good, I wished we did things here the same way.
President Trump and Political Leaders of The Current Administration tried to hide the files as best as they could. House Democrats released new information where Trump has failed which includes John Kerry’s Campaign For President Contact , Donald J Trump’s Contacts And ‘Friend’ Birthday Message , Alec Baldwin’s Contacts , Bill Clinton Contacts and ‘Friend’ Birthday Message.
In the case of President sexual relations behind wife’s back Bill Clinton
and In the case of Not President yet (at the time it occurred) sexual relations with pornstar behind wife’s back Donald J Trump.
The flock together part being The Epstein Birthday Album.
Though it is in the red text labeled, “Available To Download” so highly recommend reading it for yourself. Filled with sexual innuendos, animals mating, Epstein childhood photos, weird birthday messages from breast imprints to naked women drawings to what have you.
I agree they do but the common feathers of many of there people who hung out with Epstein were rich people. That was what they had in common. Now some liked what Epstein was selling others didn’t. I find it funny that Epstein now days is being used as a weapon. Just claiming someone was somewhere where Epstein was seems to be a crime. The left keep pushing the release of the Epstein files because they think it’ll hurt Trump. The reality is it’ll hurt a lot of people on both sides, but I don’t think Trump is one of them. Trump through Epstein out of mar-a-Lago when Epstein assaulted a maid. Trump then went to the FBI and assisted them with information that led to Epstein’s arrest in 2006. (No main stream media talks about this at all).
Back to the main question. Epstein was selling a product…. That product was girls, boys young and old… whatever the rich people wanted so of course he hung around rich people. They were his customers.
It's the similar situation when you bully someone and the person talks to the teacher that you bully them. The teacher will try to find out if accusation against you are legit and asks few other people in the class if you bully the victim. If you're liked by people in the class and seen as positive, most people will defend you or lie for you, even thought they know you did something wrong. This is called criminal conspiracy involvement (maybe different in English legal terms). Crews of Epstein aircraft, service and security were aware Epstein likes underage girls. Of course most of people who were invited to those specific parties as guest knew what happens there. I'm sure most people who knew didn't sexually abuse those underage girls but they knew and didn't react. Under law it's a crime as well.
Your logic is sound in the physical world of law, but not in the spiritual world of souls. In the world of beings, association absolutely defines the group. It's not a matter of guilt, it's a matter of spiritual reality. Think of a flock of birds. They don't all decide to fly to the same spot at the same time. They are all guided by the single group soul that forms them into a flock. They are one being, just as your fingers are part of you. In the spiritual world, you can't separate yourself from the group you belong to. So, no, it's not 'guilt by association' in a legal sense, but in the spiritual sense, you are your group. Your logic doesn't apply there.
It’s good to remember that Epstein was more than one kind of criminal. His experience in high finance would certainly draw a lot more “associates” than his predilection for young girls. I hope. While i would agree that all criminals should pay for their crimes, labeling someone a pederast just because they associated with one for the sake of making money is wrong. Unfortunately, it’s extremely common for people to jump to the most convenient conclusion that suits the narrative they chose before having any facts.
If I were a criminal, say I was a money launderer.. I'd certainly associate with those in the chain of the laundering process. That would most likely put my activities in the workplace primarily. I'd have 'regular' work friends and then I'd also have work friends who help me do laundry. I don't see any way to separate those two when looking at association alone.
I would still have all my 'regular' friends from school, old jobs, social activities, etc. So the majority of my social interactions would be inherently benign.
Short answer would be- Sometimes, yeah, but not usually
You’ve no idea what a person is like until you spend some time with them, at which point it’s on you if you stay and not try to avoid them.
Plus letters, the timing of which and collection of pictures tell a story too, so with sufficient evidence then yes.
I’m not going to condemn someone over one picture in a public gathering. Of course when there’s more evidence than that, then should be investigated.
Police officers would know, seems a fair few of them are in on it too. How can you trust who’s interrogating them? How many times have we heard “we’ve investigated ourselves and found nothing improper”.
Like I thought my kids you are who you hang with so when picking your friends do it carefully you better pick smat wise motivated want to be somebody type of friends. You will be just like that, if you will be the complete opposite. It's your choice
Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
