
Do you believe the work Charlie Kirk did was about keeping women silent?

Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News 
LOL some communist rag of a web page said that? I doubt Charly Kirk even mentioned women that much. I now he had traditional views. Muslims have even more extreme views about women though and the left love Muslims.
I dont believe he was if that was true he would have even let woman discuss issues at his debates and honestly I could go even further but im sick and dont feel like it unless someone wants me too lol
Opinion
12Opinion
No. Charlie Kirk wanted to educate people about the evil of abortion and the wrongness and insanity of LGBTQ movement, especially loons claiming there are 3 or more "genders". The whole reason that bastard killed Kirk is because Kirk literally proved both groups of liberals dead wrong in debates countless times as recorded on Youtube and elsewhere.
Kirk in abortion debate:
Iiberal: "it's not alive. It's a parasite."
Kirk: "What species is it?"
Liberal (reluctantly): ... Human...
Kirk: "Then killing it is wrong."
The assassin killed Charlie Kirk because Charlie Kirk opposed LGBTQ marriage based on logic and based on Godly, moral principles. The assassin should be put to death for hate crimes.
Now we have LGBTQs interrupting Kirk's vigils and telling conservatives they "want you to die" because that's how evil the liberal party has become in this nation.
I swear to God, civil war is coming, and I won't be on the liberal side.
I know for a fact that isn’t true. Charlie literally never silenced anyone. Regardless of how ignorant or abusive they were, Kirk gave everyone a shot at the mic. He rarely introduced his wife and kids at public events because he knew exactly the kind of people who might be there. He protected his wife and kids, as a good husband and father does.
The left, who continue to claim that they had nothing to do with his death, are the only ones celebrating it and casting wholly fabricated aspersions about the kind of man he was and the kind of life he lead.
Only the dumbest mufuggers on the planet are believing their lies and half truths anymore.
Feminists are essentially gender communists, lying is all they are good at.
They love to misuse the word "submissive" when it is mentioned in the Bible when talking about wives, but it also says that the husband should not only love his wife but to die for her if he has to, like Christ died for the church.
The Bible wants men to be the heads of the household, but he's gone now. The Bible is also not against female leader either so I don't see the problem with her taking over.
No, never saw that, but instead, his work was to teach us about being a Born again Christian and to love our country, and he did have his own beliefs about being a Republican-Conservative and expressed them all aloud to teach people. Sure, he debated you... He was opinionated. xxxxxxxxxxxx
Charlie Kirk openly debated many women and treated them seriously and respectfully. Not really the actions of a misogynist
Hmmmm. I think it's important that she honor her late husband's memory and be a good example for her children. I can definitely understand the anger and frustration she may feel, but I think it would be unwise if she were to attempt to take on what was Charlie's purpose. That's not saying be silenced, but rather, use her voice to keep his memory alive. She's got a tough road ahead of her.
I wouldn't say he wanted women silent. He wanted them subservient to their father or husband. If he told her to do something, she had to do it.
Let's look at his views after Taylor Swift was engaged to Travis Kelce. He expected her to retire after their marriage and listen to Kelce in relation to decisions. In other words, if he was a conservative, she had to vote that way as well, because he was her man and thus dictated her actions.
I've not seen nor heard anything about Charlie Kirk silencing women. He openly debated all kinds of people, including women. That was his main message... encourage open discussion.
No, he seemed like a good husband and I never heard him say anything sexist. He seemed like he truly practiced what he preached.
He was indeed an asshole and a racist prick. He surely wasn’t a friend to woman or woman’s issues.
They seem desperate to smear his memory
Among other disgusting things Kirk believed.
I think it's a bit more nuanced than that.
I never heard of him before he was killed.
I dont care he was an asshole
I'm sick of hearing about Charlie Kirk.
I’m sick of hearing about the Epstein files. 🤷🏻♂️
Me too.
You can also add your opinion below!
Most Helpful Opinions