Why is it so much easier to emotionally manipulate female world leaders?

[Vegasrunner]

[RavVid]

Is it? There haven't been that many female world leaders and of those there have been not that many have been in been in top tier countries and then there is the question did they fail domestically or in foreign relations?

You can tell a political party is in trouble because they put a female leader up as a last ditch resort to retain power. Kamala is just the most recent of last resort female leaders that have been bound to fail when tested.

The two recent UK female Prime Minister failed spectacularly but failed domestically. They just didn't have the wherewithal to run a country.

Australia's female Prime Minister Julia Gillard also failed spectacularly. No wherewithal either.

I think the only female world leader you can point to of significance is Merkle. She did get to retire and domestically was successful other than taking in a large number of muslim immigrants and having to hide all the rapes. That was a highly emotional decision by her and a bad one..

Putin did undoubtedly play Merkle and she made decisions that were very bad for Germany. She's about the only female world leader and she failed very badly in Geopol 101 due to emotional decisions..

Golda Meir could be mentioned but Israel is a small country so she doesn't qualify as a world leader. Indira Ghandi? India wasn't a significant country in her time and, besides, her own security detail shot her for mismanaging local Geopol.

The only bright spot of female world leaders was Margaret Thatcher but she was manipulated by Argentina into starting a war and was sacked by her own party. And she buggered the dissolution of USSR. Kaliningrad could have been incorporated into Europe if it wasn't for her pathological highly emotional dislike of Germany. Now it is a dagger pointed at Europe's heart.

[WindAtMyBack]

Why do pigs fly when they don't have wings? Well, first you must prove that pigs can fly. If you can't do that, then the "why" part is irrelevant.

[Vegasrunner]

@WindAtMyBack Pigs don't fly.

[WindAtMyBack]

Did you totally miss the point?

[Vegasrunner]

@WindAtMyBack If you have a point, please clearly articulate it in writing.

[WindAtMyBack]

You asked why females are easier to emotionally manipulate. You must first show that females really are easier to emotionally manipulate.

[Vegasrunner]

@WindAtMyBack That was proving 5000 years ago. Keep up.

[Zionne]

It’s not inherently easier to manipulate female leaders lol perception plays a role. Often, gender biases lead some people to underestimate women’s authority or resilience, and manipulators exploit those societal assumptions rather than any actual emotional weakness.

[Aliceouyang]

The premise of this question is not very accurate. In fact, easy manipulation depends more on personal character, political environment and diplomatic strategy than on

[Vegasrunner]

@aliceouyang For men yes. Females make most of their decisions on emotion.

[Anonymous]

Is it really? I don't think so, just imagine Hilary Clinton as the president...

[Vegasrunner]

@Anonymous She was one of the most qualified people ever and still couldn't get elected.

[Opinion Owner]

Because she is a warmonger, just like Biden, just like EU.

[Vegasrunner]

@opinipn owner Nah that's just political talking points politicians use to deceive the uneducated.

[Opinion Owner]

On contrary, they were actively trying to provoke WW3 with Russia and China, and cause a nuclear holocaust. Good thing USA now has a really great president.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner You belive convicted felons who bankrupted a casino are great?

[Opinion Owner]

He is a successful businessman, and he was most likely framed by someone.
He made peace in Palestine, and I'm sure he'll make peace in Ukraine too.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner Inherited most of his money from Daddy and still messed it up. Countless discrimination lawsuits, talked the economy because, there is no peace in Palestine, (media lies) and supports the dictator who invaded Ukraine. Can't do business w/ anyone he can't bully. He's easily the most incompetent world leader of last two centuries. His regime has set Anerica back 60 years. The only hope is that another Obama or Clinton emerges to fix the countries problems once again.

[Opinion Owner]

He inherited most of his money? See, not all the men have to work to get rich.
Media are just trying to ruin his reputation.
That "dictator" is just trying to get back the land that was originally Russian (both ethnically, and historically), not Ukrainian.
The president knows that, and that's why he is supporting him.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion owner Yea his daddy was the one who created their familes wealth then gave it to his son who did what he could to blow it. Cheetoe os the typical born on third pretend he hit a home run whit boy. Hitler was also just trying to get his countries land back so it's the same thing.

[Opinion Owner]

He is still very rich. Besides, I bet you wish that your daddy had so much money too.
No it's not, Hitler was trying to occupy other nations and ethnicities.
Crimean peninsula was originally Russian, it was given to Ukraine in 1954, by the communist dictator Nikita Khrushchev. Absolute majority of the population are Russians.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner So you agree he got his money from his daddy. Yes WW2 literally started because Hitler wanted to regain the territory taken in the treaty of Versaille. Please learn actually history.

[Opinion Owner]

I agree because you told me, I never knew that, I don't know his biography, I'm just taking your word as a fact, but I'm not sure if you're right about that.
I know history much better than you do, as I said, Hitler was invading other nations, just like the previous German leaders did in the past. Those lands were never actually German ethnic lands, they occupied many nations by force!
Russia is just taking their historical and ethnical property... not to mention that Ukraine never existed as a historical land, it was actually a region of Russia.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion owner few people walking the earth know history better than I do. You certainly don't seem to know anything about history based on your comment. I'm just glad I'm able to educate you.

[Opinion Owner]

Well, I'm one of those people, because you obviously never knew this... you can't educate even a five years old kid, let alone someone with my level of knowledge.

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion owner You are correct you're understanding of history is at the level of a 5 year old.

[Opinion Owner]

My level of history knowledge is way beyond yours...
Read some books, maybe you'll learn something.
external-content.duckduckgo.com/.../

[Vegasrunner]

@Opinion Owner There are very few I haven't. Perhaps take your own advice. Start with History of America Vol 1 and 2 by William Bennet and lml when you're finished.

[Opinion Owner]

History of America is short and relevant only to Americans.
European, Asian, or even some African civilizations are way older.

[DrPepper12]

You're joking.

[RedInnocent69]

Says you