If artificial wombs were invented would having children naturally be considered a low status/poor people behavior?

[Anonymous]

Yes

No

[Amy_Mi]

It’s possible that perceptions could shift, but social value isn’t solely dictated by technology.

Historically, natural childbirth has cultural, emotional, and symbolic significance.

Even with artificial wombs, choosing natural pregnancy may remain associated with intimacy, tradition, or personal preference rather than “status.”

Status hierarchies tend to form around access, choice, and societal narratives but meaning is layered, and personal values often outweigh technological trends.

[Asker]

How much of that is post-hoc justification for biological reality?

[CupcakeTheDestroyer]

No, having artificial wombs would be considered behavior by the rich and infertile, same as surrogates.

[Dargil]

Why would they?

[Asker]

Because everyone else can afford artificial and those who can't must be poor

[Dargil]

Or maybe breeders should be admired for their dedication.

[noohair]

Your English is poor...