Agree or disagree? Biblical Womanhood is not Feminism?

[SolitarySolace]

The Feminist Trap: Why standing for biblical womanhood isn’t feminism - https://youtu.be/2sjdtMMNOR0

Agree

Disagree

[Snakeyes7]

Feminists despise the Bible simply for telling them to not be a miserable wife.

[Cidknee]

I heartily agree.

[MzAsh]

If a woman freely chooses a traditional, faith based role, cool, that’s still her exercising agency and control over her own lifestyle. It only stops being compatible with feminism when those roles are pushed as the only “godly” option and women are shamed or controlled if they want something different.

[SolitarySolace]

@MzAsh
100% — if she freely chooses it, it’s agency.
Biblical womanhood isn’t a cage — it’s a crown.
She doesn’t rule alone — she reigns alongside her husband in wisdom, raising warriors, honoring God.
That’s power.
Feminism broke women when it shamed that partnership.

[MzAsh]

The feminism I come from doesn’t shame that lifestyle. It only encourages her agency regardless of what that is.

[SolitarySolace]

@MzAsh
“Agency” sounds nice—until a feminist falsely accuses a man and slaps him with a PPO.
I lived it.
Biblical womanhood isn’t about “choice.”
It’s about truth—and truth doesn’t need a movement to validate it.

[MzAsh]

I’m sorry you went through that, false accusations are awful. But one person misusing a label doesn’t make women’s agency the problem. We don’t throw out men’s rights because some men lie in court, and we don’t throw out women’s choices because some women do, either.
If “biblical womanhood” is really truth, women will be drawn to it freely. The second you say it’s “not about choice,” you’re talking about control, not truth.

[SolitarySolace]

@MzAsh,
False accusations aren’t “one bad apple.”
They’re fruit of a movement that says “believe women” — no evidence needed.
Biblical womanhood isn’t control.
It’s submission to Christ, not self.
Truth doesn’t need a label.
It just wins. 🙏
Good night.

[MzAsh]

I’m with you on due process. False accusations are serious and should be treated that way. Where we split is the leap from “some women lied” to “this is the fruit of feminism.” False accusations existed long before hashtags or “believe women.”They come from human dishonesty, not one movement.

The version of “believe women” I stand by is on taking women seriously and investigate, don’t assume they’re lying on sight. That’s compatible with evidence and courts.

And even in your framework, a woman choosing biblical womanhood is still using agency, which is always a woman’s top priority. If it’s really truth, it should hold up when women are free to choose it, without shaming or limiting everything else.

[beefcakebradybatson]

WHO FREAKIN' CARES?