Do you think less people should be allowed to vote?

[Telekinetic-Potato]

I've been thinking the past couple weeks about how you could decide who gets to vote and I think a test on economic literacy and historical machivellenism might be the way.

[fishcake_buttie]

Those who actually care about their people and love their country should be allowed to vote. This should apply to the politicians being voted for as well, they should have a long history of showing love and servitude to their communities long before ever thinking about becoming a leader of people. Those who have a history of encouraging young people into doing any thing that reduces the amount of good, healthy and honest families shouldn't be able to vote - all people who have been destructive thinking they are doing good shouldn't and those that change should need multiple references to have the right to vote. Those who are loving, do no harm and should get to have a say in how things are run for everyone. Love and actions made with it being the most important factor to decide who gets to vote - so nobody is excluded based on sex, literacy level, how much money they've got and things like that.

Me being a "right wing bigot..." and all that, I have a whole manifesto on how nations can be run fairly with the absolute minimum of central government... So just ignore me...

[ProbablyClueless]

Given what I saw in law school? Hell yeah I do. Let's cut those voter rolls down ASAP.

We got some dumbass illiterates running around. Anyone who hears the phrase "Fact Check, brought you by Reuters" and doesn't hear a problem, is too stupid to vote.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

No, because who decides what is on that test could alienate an entire subsection of voters whether it be a financial, racial or gender divide, all of which are wrong. We are a democracy and this country needs to be treated as such and not eliminate people just because we don't agree with them.

[Chazmatazz269]

It’s not about whether or not we agree, it’s about how unbelievably stoopid too many voters are.

[Ez-Bri-Z_v2]

Everyone thinks the other side is stupid for voting the way they do. Nobody is right in the others eyes. So, no, nobody should be banned just to appease you or anyone else's political leanings.

[Kingofkings1992]

Perfectly said. Thanks for a very mature comment @Ez-Bri-Z_v2. Maybe one day @OneViewpoint will be half as mature as you are, but it’s doubtful

[jazzy34]

No, but certain people shouldn’t be allowed to run for office.

[OneViewpoint]

Absolutely. There should be an IQ test. Anyone below average (100) should be given a lollipop and sent home.

This would eliminate 95% of MAGA. If you’re illiterate and can’t read the ballot questions just go to Cracker Barrel instead of voting.

[Kingofkings1992]

IQ is a very marginal assessment of what intelligence actually involves. There are stupid magas, absolutely. There’s certainly no shortage of stupid lefties either.

[Chazmatazz269]

There should definitely be a series of tests that people have to pass in order to vote. There are a lot of people who are too dumb to name a dog. They definitely shouldn’t have a say in how our government is run and by whom.

[DrPepper12]

I think MORE should vote

16-18 yo

Prisoners, felons, parolees

For starters

[exitseven]

No , we just need to have voter ID to make sure no illegal aliens or dead people are voting. Only citizens can vote.

[FunkyMonkee]

Yes, none of the illegals should be allowed to vote!!

[beefcakebradybatson]

I think you mean "fewer" people, but more INTELLIGENT folk should vote.

[Kingofkings1992]

You think you are intelligent?

[beefcakebradybatson]

@Kingofkings1992 One sixty-plus IQ along with cover boy good looks at age 72, Your Majesty!!!

[RedInnocent69]

Republicans seem to think so