If you are opposed to the actions against Iran, what was your plan to deal with Iran increasingly becoming a terrorist state, and threat to the world?

Question

7 presidents and dozens of world leaders over the past 50 years have been saying decisive and destructive action needs to be taken, up to and including complete annihilation of the Iranian nation-state, to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, as well as its military power to cause harm throughout Europe and the Middle East. They've all said it's immoral to just “kick the can down the road,” but that's all they've done, again and again, for many decades.

As this has happened, Iran has strengthened dramatically as a nuclear threat and military power, receiving hundreds of billions of dollars in financing from China and Russia and, unfortunately, the U. S. under Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden, plus many more billions in equipment, weapons and top secret U. S. technology.

President Trump was the only one to actually take action, any action, to stop this terrorist regime which has been completely out of control since the 1970s, but leftists are saying it's the worst thing that's ever happened in U. S. history.

So what would your plan have been to deal with the Iranian threat, if Trump's precision strikes to neutralize it have been so wrong? The entire world is a much safer place than it was just a week ago, and the people of Iran are experiencing great joy at their first array of freedom for the the first time in over 50 years.

If you are opposed to the actions against Iran, what was your plan to deal with Iran increasingly becoming a terrorist state, and threat to the world?

Zack-Bann · Accepted Answer

Ever since the “revolution” the regime has been a net negative for its own people and for everyone else

The only ones who benefited were the close members of it who are typically islamist extremists

Ironically they spent 50 years giving Islam a horrible name so even their own religion wasn’t a winner

This dismantling should have happened as soon as they came into power
It would have saved the world a lot of war
Without them there is no Al Qaeda, there is no Al Assad regime, no Hezbollah, no Houthis, and so on.

Imagine all the death and destruction and poverty and displacement that has resulted from that.
I’m not a fan of the US and Israel taking the world’s law into their own hands but their willingness to get this done now is actually a favor for everyone else who wasn’t capable of doing this.

Hagar88 · Accepted Answer

Iran has been attacking war with America for 50 years, its only now that Trump has acknowledged it.

NaultD · Answer

We keep the Obama nuclear deal. From there trade flows. People want stuff and buy things and want more freedoms and gradually on there terms more secular.

Even religious tourism could help ease tension. Pray to your god but our cultural methods and break down some barriers. It's aberhamic right? Share some food dance party.

To get that extra cash flow you got to be competitive to attract tourists. That happened back in the 60s already. In the same way Osama bin ladin was apart of the cia to fight the soviet union and look how well that turned out.

Bricealan · Answer

Well, you know full well that anything like this takes a President with Balls, but of course the  leftist communist/socialists  are going to raise all kinds of hell about it. There isn't another solution than what Trump and Isreal are doing, as everyone with any brains knows from history that Iran is never going to stop in it's terrorist activities and with the same aggressive mantra  "Death to Isreal, death to America" This should have been done years ago.

exitseven · Answer

Exactly, nobody wants Iran to have a nuke but nobody wants to go to war. It's sort of like this.

BonzoInBitburg · Answer

A threat to the world is a bit of a stretch. They were a threat to Israel first and foremost and Iran has hated the US for decades. Other than that, there isn't a long list of countries threatened by Iran.

Anonymous · Answer

Personally, I would've also bombed the large groups of Ayatollah mourners. There should be no one left to retaliate or retake the government.
We could've also had another country do our dirty work so they wouldn't retaliate against Americans

beefcakebradybatson · Answer

Arming Iranians so they can deal with their tyrant.

Sal_Monella · Answer

Erasure if the Theocracy is important.

If you are opposed to the actions against Iran, what was your plan to deal with Iran increasingly becoming a terrorist state, and threat to the world?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

So here are the terms for Iran , would you do it to avoid war with US?

If you are opposed to the actions against Iran, what was your plan to deal with Iran increasingly becoming a terrorist state, and threat to the world?

Most Helpful Opinions

What Girls & Guys Said

So here are the terms for Iran , would you do it to avoid war with US?

We're glad to see you liked this post.