Girl's Behavior 
Guy's Behavior 
Flirting 
Dating 
Relationships 
Fashion & Beauty 
Health & Fitness 
Marriage & Weddings 
Shopping & Gifts 
Technology & Internet 
Break Up & Divorce 
Education & Career 
Entertainment & Arts 
Family & Friends 
Food & Beverage 
Hobbies & Leisure 
Other 
Religion & Spirituality 
Society & Politics 
Sports 
Travel 
Trending & News 
Based on two things I've read recently.
Why would AG Bondi plead the Fifth Amendment after being asked about a $2.3 million settlement related to the Epstein investigation?(It turns out she never did, but it was definitely not obvious; the asker was tricked, but that happens to everyone from time to time.)
The author of this program made it freely available, only to find grifters profiting off it by pretending donations to them would help him.
https://beyondloom.com/blog/onwigglypaint.html
https://www.newsweek.com/misinformation-fake-news-political-polarization-democrat-republican-1998742
"Republicans are more willing than Democrats to spread fake news—particularly during times of greater "political polarization," or competition between the parties—because they want to win more."
LLMs make it much easier to create fake news, for example "say this in the voice of Rachael Maddow"...
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
3Opinion
Ah, Newsweek, leftist propaganda. No wonder a biased leftist propagandist like you posted this crap and cited it.
Whatever you do, don't click on the link and then on to the scientific study they're referring to. It's much better to just complain about where the information comes from.
Everything you say is a lie, and to call that biased partisan claptrap a "scientific study" is one of the worst you've ever told. That's what happens when you grab at the first thing that provides confirmation bias for you. And no honest person would even consider a single study the final word on a topic.
Anyone that would write the following is a partisan hack:
"Our team finds that political polarization triggers Republicans, but not Democrats, to spread misinformation that is objectively false. Although Republicans may understand the content is very likely false, they are willing to spread it. We also discover the reason why Republicans respond to political polarization by conveying misinformation, while Democrats do not:"
See, "Everything you say is a lie" is an obvious lie that you roll out every time you don't have anything but bullshit to support your position. Ironically, that supports the contention that the right is more likely to disseminate misinformation.
What in their methodology was invalid? journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222429241264997
They are biased based on the commercial stance of the owners of these software tools.
The owners just take clients money, the clients are the ones telling them to lie to you.
Grok currently takes money to allow people to create CSAM, I don't know why whoever made that decision isn't in prison.
I queried Chatgpt (free) till it confessed to having safeguards that will protect vulnerable groups ahead of "less vulnerable" groups even though it will not hold back about stereotypes of men but will avoid stereotypes of women.
bahahaha that newsweek article hilarious from the folks who claim that men can be women and that the covid shot was safe and effective.
"They found that Republicans respond to political competition more aggressively, communicating information that is likely untrue, if not definitively false, to boost their side."
That would be you.
lol, from the guy who claimed the majority of America is against deporting all illegals.
SOME, NOT ALL, should be deported is the majority position in every group but Republicans.
Practically everyone agrees that violent criminals should be (after they've served prison sentences), only a bare majority for other criminals. At least one Republican lawmaker thinks that people locked up for their crimes are roaming free because they're not in ICE detention. He's an idiot, too.
"ROJO: Six hundred fifty thousand people that are at large in America have committed crimes. Fifteen thousand murderers. Twenty thousand rapists. Mr. Bier, you're shaking your head.
BIER: They're not at large. The murderers are in prison. They're in prison where they should be.
ROJO: They're not detained.
BIER: Yes, they're detained by the state. They're not detained by ICE. They're in prisons, ready to be deported."
All. I already posted the evidence for you.
And I've posted counter-evidence. Why do you think your poll is more accurate than Pew's, and did it allow for "some" as an answer?
""Although Republicans may understand the content is very likely false, they are willing to spread it because they strongly value their party winning over the competition," Zhu said in a statement."
Because it's more recent and more reliable. Can a man become a woman?
Polls: NYT 55%, Marquette 64%, CBS 57%, ABC 56% say deport ALL here illegally. Nearly 90% back shipping out the criminals. Trump promised mass deportations and we elected him to do it.
Links? Do they allow for a "some" answer?
look the shit up yourself. I'm not your handmaid.
So, no, they don't allow for a "some" answer.
cope and seethe about it. Majority has spoken.
Yes. In 2024, a majority thought they'd approve. Now it's happening, not even close. But keep pretending you're serious.
The harvard poll was march 6 2026.
What Harvard poll? What makes it better than Pew? Did it have a "some" option?
This one. The same one that proved you were full of shit the last time you tried lying.
cis.org/.../Latest-HarvardHarris-Poll-Shows-Trump-SOTU-Bump-Immigration
Separately, Harvard/Harris asked respondents whether they favored (or not) Trump’s vow to deport “all immigrants who are here illegally”.
That policy received approval from 57 percent of respondents, including 35 percent of Democrat voters and 56 percent of Independents.
mediabiasfactcheck.com/.../
Reasoning: Anti-Immigration Propaganda, Misleading Claims
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT (8.9)
Factual Reporting: LOW (7.0)
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
And that's not surprising. In the actual poll:
Approve of Trump on… (Strongly or Somewhat Approve) Immigration: 48%
55% oppose "Hiring an additional 20,000 border patrol and ICE agents to conduct immigration raids and policing within different parts of the country"
Harvard/harris isn’t biased, the people lying about what it says are.
Except they aren’t lying. You’re now moving goalposts. Yawn. It’s so boring
Yes, they are lying because Approve of Trump on Immigration is at 48%, even in the poll you've picked. Other polls show that's an outlier, and the CBS one you posted an image of was from 2024, before people saw what it looks like in practice.
The polling had switched to minority support by last July, and that was before they shot two citizens to death.
You mean before two people made stupid choices?
The murderers? Yes.
The law enforcement acting legally? Yes
Murdering citizens is not legal. They were in no imminent danger, shooting the first one only had the effect of making the vehicle more dangerous and the murderer strolled away, the second one was on his hands and knees and surrounded by half a dozen agents.
But of course, this is just about you moving goalposts, as you accused me of doing when I pointed out that I'm talking about today's polls and you're posting year-old ones.
The second victim.
Well of course it's not legal to murder someone. Which is why abortion should be illegal. But yes, both agents acted legally within their rights of self defense.
It was not "self defence", neither agent was in imminent danger. Shooting the first one only had the effect of making the vehicle more dangerous and the murderer strolled away, the second victim was on his hands and knees and surrounded by half a dozen agents.
But of course, this is just about you moving goalposts, as you accused me of doing when I pointed out that I'm talking about today's polls and you're posting year-old ones.
Yes, they were. And you brought up the two dopes in minnesota, so you're a shitbag liar, too.
I brought them up because even before they were murdered the majority of Americans didn't support mass deportation. If you weren't trying to move the goalposts, you'd address the fact that today's polls don't support your claim.
well that's not true either. And the majority of voters voted for Trump who ran on mass deportations. Mass deportations are good for America. I know that's why you hate them.
Lies. A minority of voters voted for Trump. Yes, he did run on "mass deportations". Mass deportations are not good for America. You don't know anything.
The majority voted for trump, dipshit.
The Harvard CAPS/Harris poll (the one showing 57% support for deporting all immigrants who are here illegally) had its fieldwork end on February 26, 2026.
A Fox News poll (Feb. 28–March 2, 2026) found 59% favor “deporting immigrants who are here illegally back to their home countries,” but the question does not explicitly say “all.”
That's the whole point of everything you argue on this board. A weak America is good for you eurotrash so you oppose anything that makes America stronger.
No, fewer than 50% of voters voted for Trump. A fact that probably annoys the hell out of both of you.
"The Harvard CAPS/Harris poll", noting a "bump" towards Trump after the SOTU speech, is the one that shows approval of Trump on immigration at 48%, just 39% favourable to ICE, 27% of respondents saying immigration is important, with only 11% saying it's the most important thing to them.
"Deporting immigrants who are here illegally and have committed crimes" 75%, a reasonable bipartisan consensus that includes 72% of independents and 68% of Democrats.
Your preferred question: "Deporting all immigrants who are here illegally" does indeed say 57%, but, amazingly, has lower GOP support (79%) than for the policy "Deporting immigrants who are here illegally and have committed crimes" (84%).
"Hiring an additional 20,000 border patrol and ICE agents to conduct immigration raids and policing within different parts of the country" is popular with just 45% of the country.
harvardharrispoll.com/.../...26_KeyResults_Mon.pdf
It's not surprising you don't link to the polls you cherry-pick from!
"Fox News Poll: 59% of voters say ICE is too aggressive, up 10 points since July"
www.foxnews.com/.../fox-news-poll-59-voters-say-ice-too-aggressive-up-10-points-since-july
Sorry, that's an earlier one.
"Fox News Poll: Disapproval of ICE on the rise"
www.foxnews.com/.../fox-news-poll-disapproval-ice-rise
Overall, I'd say you're right that a solid majority want illegal aliens deported but an equally solid majority think Trump's not doing it properly.
The whole world is better off with a consistent, competent, and strong America. Right now it's none of those things.
He got more votes than the drunk. That's all that matters. So yeah, the majority of Americans want all illegals deported. Like I said at the start.
I know you like lies ("the drunk"?) and hate nuance. More votes is not all that matters to you because you were still insisting that Trump won the majority of votes, not just the most. The majority of Americans disagree with the way Trump's gone about rounding up immigrants. That's also important. It will probably also increase as more details of the concentration camps come out.
Well it absolutely matters because he's president. And I really don't give a shit that the majority disagrees with his methods.
Bahahah concentration camps. You clowns live in a fantasy world.
"A concentration camp is a prison or other facility used for the internment of political prisoners or politically targeted demographics, such as members of national or ethnic minority groups, on the grounds of national security, or for exploitation or punishment." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_camp
ICE detention facilities are concentration camps, and not particularly nice ones, despite multiple Amendments to the United States Constitution.
As just one example. "Hundreds of 911 calls from staff at Camp East Montana, the nation's largest U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facility, reveal a disturbing portrait of overcrowding, medical neglect, malnutrition, and emotional distress among detainees. The facility, hastily constructed last summer, has faced allegations of violating federal standards for immigration detention, with detainees describing unsanitary living conditions, lack of access to medication and healthcare, and a culture of fear and violence." nationaltoday.com/.../
bahahaha illegal immigrants aren't political prisoners nor are they targeted by ethnicity. No matter how much fucking nonsense you try to throw at it, it won't stick. So you can stop with your usual bullshit today.
"... or politically targeted demographics, such as members of national or ethnic minority groups".
Racial profiling by ICE and detention of citizens and people legally in the country proves you wrong.
Weird, you think all illegal immigrants are just one ethnicity? That seems pretty racist.
You think they're not being targeted for political reasons?
Ah, your "that's racist" angle failed so we have to pivot. So what you're saying is that the democrats allowing illegals to invade the border and carting them to swing states was a political move to shore up democrat power in elections? I'm shocked you're dipping your toe into reality.
No pivot, you just made a stupid accusation that wasn't worth responding to, and now another even more ridiculous.
DHS are picking up people all over the country and putting them in concentration camps. Some are picked up because of the colour of their skin, some are tourists who have made a mistake, many are being detained when they turn up to court as they were required to, and a few are actually serious criminals of the sort Trump claimed he would be going after. The whole operation is political and they're being detained in concentration camps.
Except they’re not concentration camps no matter how much you lie about it.
So what's your definition of a concentration camp?
"Merriam-Webster defines a concentration camp as “a place where large numbers of people (such as prisoners of war, political prisoners, refugees, or the members of an ethnic or religious minority) are detained or confined under armed guard”. By that definition, ICE already operates a sprawling network of concentration camps where captured immigrants, the largest group of whom have committed no crime, are housed in what countless accounts describe as inhumane conditions, designed to degrade, hurt, sicken and punish them, despite Trump administration claims that ICE facilities are held to “national detention standards”."
""By the end of his first year, [Adolf] Hitler had around 50,000 people held in his roughly 70 concentration camps, facilities that were often improvised in factories, prisons, castles, and other buildings," wrote Hartmann. "By comparison, today ICE is holding over 70,000 people in 225 concentration camps across America," with hopes to "more than double both numbers in the coming months.""
"The scale of the Trump administration’s plans to warehouse human beings is hard to fathom. Here’s one way to put it in perspective: On a given day, New York City’s notorious Rikers Island jail complex holds approximately 7,000 detainees. President Donald Trump’s regime, which is currently holding a record 70,000 people in immigration detention, now plans to develop a network of Rikers-sized concentration camps for immigrants nationwide."
Illegal immigrants aren’t political prisoners no matter how much you lie about it.
So what's your definition of a concentration camp? I'd love to see one that doesn't cover what's happening right now in the US.
Are jails concentration camps?
I knew you couldn't give a definition of a concentration camp that doesn't cover what's happening right now in the US.
Can you tell me the difference between a ICE/DHS detention facility and a concentration camp? ↗ Nor can your friends.
These shitlibs on this site aren’t my friends. Are jails concentration camps?
Can you tell me the difference between a ICE/DHS detention facility and a concentration camp? ↗
Bahaha your stupid question isn;’t evidence of anything. But nice pivot after you’ve been embarrassed again.
You still didn't answer the question, of course, because you know there isn't a difference.
Can you tell me the difference between a ICE/DHS detention facility and a concentration camp? ↗
lol I’m not answering your stupid question. I’ve already proven you wrong. I don’t have to do it again.
Oh, yes, the "I already did that" ploy. Never works. You didn't.
Come back to me when you grow up enough to admit a mistake.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!