Is Trump actually just a serial killer?

[Anonymous]

Think about what he's done in the past and what he's doing now before you answer the question.

Yes, now that I think about it, he really is a serial killer.

No, he's not a serial killer. Everything he does is just fine.

[goaded]

Mass murderer. Cancelling USAID has killed getting on for a million, mostly children, and naturally lowered the US's standing in the world (https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-documentary/the-shutdown-of-usaid-has-already-killed-hundreds-of-thousands ). The cutting off of oil to Cuba apparently just killed 3,000 people in a hospital that relied on electricity to keep them alive. (That's unconfirmed.)

[Staximus]

This is an idiotic question. How many people do you think Trump has actually killed himself? Probably none.

[Asker]

If by killed himself, you mean personally killed with his own hands? Probably none. He's like a mob boss. He just hires other people to do his killing. That doesn't make him any less of a killer.

[Agape93]

Nah. Just a serial rapist and pedophile. The fat shit bag isn't physically capable of murder, so he just has others do it for him.

[Asker]

Isn't it true, however, that when you suborn murder, that actually makes you a murderer?

[Agape93]

Not in my opinion

[Asker]

So if you hire somebody to murder, somebody that doesn't make you a murderer?

[Agape93]

Unless I physically kill that target, no, I'm not a murderer. Pretty sure I was clear

[Asker]

Okay well I guarantee the law will treat you as a murderer whether you like it or not. Pretty sure I was clear.

[Agape93]

Only in organized crime with a Rico statute applied. Otherwise it's conspiracy to commit murder, which is still not a murder charge.

[Asker]

Oh you're incorrect about that

[Agape93]

Yeah no, I'm not. I know my states laws on this.

[Asker]

Cite the relevent law

[Agape93]

17-A §151 - criminal conspiracy (17-A §151) occurs when a person agrees with one or more people to commit murder, intends for it to happen, and takes a substantial step toward that crime. It is treated severely and does not require the murder to be completed, only that the agreement existed and action was taken

So again, it isn't a murder charge here. It's an entirely different crime to be charged with.

[Asker]

Take a look at the penalties for suborning murder.

[Agape93]

Still not a murder charge which is entirely my point here.

[Anonymous]

Well the war he started in Iran with Bibi is illegal so we can say he is a war criminal and that war killed over 150 girls.

[Asker]

Not to mention about 200 people in the Caribbean who were sailing in boats, and he didn't like that.

[Opinion Owner]

I actually don’t live in the USA so I have never heard of that one before but I strongly believe Donald Trump is not a good person even before the war started he always seem like a narcissist to me.

[strateguy632]

Trump is doing war. If you oppose killing then you oppose iran. Think about what iran has done in the past and doing now. Attempted murder on Israel civilian towns. Iran Even bombed a jew temple like a mosque. 😯

[Asker]

So murder will fix that?

[strateguy632]

If you oppose "murder" you oppose iran. Agreed?

[Asker]

No, I think at this point Iran is defending itself. That is not murder.

[strateguy632]

Iran is not doing "defending itself" that would be INSIDE its borders. But shooting outside is not defense.

[strateguy632]

Also you specified now. You agree "until now iran murdered during peace" so if murder is bad then you oppose iran.

[Asker]

You know, this is bullshit. Take your weird reasoning and stick it.

[Anonymous]

no because he doesn't fit the definition

[Asker]

I see. Well since you mentioned it, do you want to tell us all what the definition is according to you?

[strateguy632]

Definition: 'three or more victims, with a month-long break between murders' in america laws. Obviously not during a war.

[Asker]

@strateguy632 what is the source of that definition, and why is it valid according to you?

[strateguy632]

I explained those! Reread I quote American LAWS. It is valid because courts use it.

[Asker]

@strateguy632 I provide some evidence that the courts or anybody else actually besides you uses it. You keep making up stuff and saying it's official, and there's absolutely no evidence for it at all.

[Opinion Owner]

for starters, he's not the one physically committing whatever these murders you're speaking of

[Asker]

That is beside the point.

[slatyb]

He's a war criminal.

[beefcakebradybatson]

D**N SKIPPY !!!

[exitseven]

TDS much?