Why don't people distinguish between "DELIBRATELY TARGETING civilians" and between civilian death that was not intentional?

[strateguy632]

look at this complaint "Data shows 75,000 deaths in Gaza: women, children, and elderly people constitute over 56% of those deaths, with civilian casualties comprising a vast majority of the overall toll. Yet, they call the other guys 'terrorist' etc." but that is due to terrorist aiming AT or abducting civilian hostages. you can't just say "either way civilians died" can you?

[exitseven]

It is for the same reason the fake news fails to distinguish the difference between immigrants and illegal aliens. They are purposely trying to mislead the public.

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO😎

[strateguy632]

Well presented. Again!

[Dargil]

How many of those deaths did not involve provable willful actions by non-palestinians

[strateguy632]

Nothing willful was proven to be deliberately

[Dargil]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

[strateguy632]

when accused guilt then absence of evidence means innocent.