What do you think about the Supreme Court ruling on criminal immigrants?

[SeekerOfTruth007]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHa.

I'm laughing at Dummycrats. You won't be able to import criminals by the millions to rig your elections anymore.

[abc3643]

I don't think you understood what this case, Mullin v. Doe (25-1083), was about nor its ruling. "Mullin" is DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin.

https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/noem-v-doe-3/

===

Holding
[United States Code Title 8] Section 1254a (b)(5)(A) bars judicial review of non-constitutional claims related to Temporary Protected Status (TPS); Miot respondents’ equal protection claim— that Haiti’s TPS designation was terminated because of race — is unlikely to succeed because a race-neutral explanation for the government’s action exists: the current administration opposes the TPS program as it has been implemented in the past and has terminated every TPS designation that has come up for renewal.

===

(I added the "[United States Code Title 8]" above because it should have been there; lawyers don't need it because they knew what title of the US Code was applicable, but lay people like us don't know that and should have it since any title of the US Code could have a section § 1254a.)

Basically, those in the US under the Temporary Protected Status program who were Haitan or Syrian had their status revoked. They claimed that it was on racist grounds which is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

What the US Supreme Court is saying is, in simple terms, Trump hates the TPS anyway so he has the power to terminate such status per the cited statute and that the Haitians and Syrians aren't being singled out because there's evidence that he's terminating almost all renewals of TPS status and not doing so in a discriminatory fashion.

This is the statute involved: 8 U. S. Code § 1254a (b)(5)(A)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1254a

===

UNITED STATES CODE
TITLE 8 - ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
CHAPTER 12—IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY (§§ 1101 – 1537)
SUBCHAPTER II—IMMIGRATION (§§ 1151 – 1382)
Part V—Adjustment and Change of Status (§§ 1251 – 1260)
§ 1254a. Temporary protected status

8 U. S. Code § 1254a - Temporary protected status

(b) Designations
(5) Review
(A) Designations
There is no judicial review of any determination of the Attorney General with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation, of a foreign state under this subsection.

===

Basically, this is saying that TPS designation with respect to any nation is not subject to judicial review meaning the Administration can do what it wants. I don't disagree with that in principle since this is part of the Executive Branch's power over foreign relations. Per the Council on Foreign Relations:

The Executive Branch, led by the President, possesses extensive constitutional and statutory powers over U. S. foreign relations. While Congress retains critical powers like declaring war and ratifying treaties, the President acts as the sole representative of the United States on the world stage.

Is Trump doing it because he's a racist? Maybe; he is a racist after all. But, the law under question applies to nations, not individuals, and foreign relations are the President's area to lead. He might have issues with various nations because he's a racist or bigot or whatever, but that was never discussed in the US Constitution nor do I believe it should be.

While I am left-leaning and haven't read the opinion nor the dissents, I suspect I agree with the opinion for the most part. Instinctively, I agree with it for objective reasons that would take time to explain.

[abc3643]

Forgot to include this:
www.cfr.org/.../us-foreign-policy-powers-congress-and-president

[msc545]

I'm sure you're very happy because now you get to get rid of all the non-white people that you hate so much. I'm sure in the end that will work out very well for you.

[Pterodon]

I love it and it will

[SeekerOfTruth007]

I don't hate non-white people. I'm part Jewish, part German, part English, and part Native American. You know nothing substantial about me.

[msc545]

All I know about you is through your own writings.

[SeekerOfTruth007]

I'm not opposed to Immigration. I'm opposed to illegal immigration and the associated drug cartels. That's something you liberals seem incapable of understanding.

[msc545]

For you and people like you, illegal immigration means immigration by anybody who isn't white. That seems to be something you're incapable of admitting to, but you know it's true.

[Pterodon]

That is not true. It’s what you want to think. My fiancé is black so what do you have to say to that?

[msc545]

@Pterodon are you also a member of the American Nazi Party, or whatever the euphemism is for that now? Because if you're not, you should be. You are a pretty good Nazi, actually. Maybe build some concentration camp-like cages in your backyard, and instead of barbecuing, just use your barbecue as a crematorium for the bodies of the people that you killed back there? How about a nice gas chamber for Christmas?

[SeekerOfTruth007]

Guy, fuck off. You're accusing us of stuff we absolutely don't support. I hate Nazis and don't understand why a political party supporting the Nazis is even allowed to exist.

[msc545]

If you hate Nazi so much why do you keep behaving like one? You don't hate them. You admire them. Admit it. If you're so proud of your racist attitudes and at least have the balls to admit, you have them. Stop denying the obvious.

[Pterodon]

I can’t be a Nazi because I love the Jews and Israel plus weren’t the Nazis about racial purity?

[SeekerOfTruth007]

I must be the only "Nazi" who roots for Israel then.

That's right, I support Israel and I hate the Palestinians. I'll admit that.

[msc545]

Yes, that makes perfect sense since at this point in history, it is hard to tell the difference between the Israelis and the Nazis. Also, the Palestinians and the Jews are hard to tell apart.

[SeekerOfTruth007]

The Jews are there legally. The Palestinians are not. Plus the Palestinians are terrorists and celebrated the 911 terrorist attacks in the USA on world-wide television. It's hard to feel sympathy for people who celebrated terrorist attacks.

[msc545]

To answer your question, I think that the Supreme Court is made up of six justices who are racist trash.

[SeekerOfTruth007]

I think the court is made up of 9 atheists with varying views on life, but they regularly side with atheistic immoral worldviews.

[msc545]

Thanks for M. H. O. I'm stunned you awarded it to me, but thank you.

[strateguy632]

luckily trump appointed decent people to supreme court!

[exitseven]

This s what we voted for. Send them all back and do it fast

[darkcloud1945]

Finally, the idiots of the Supreme Court finally got one right for a change.