isn't it ironic that democrats say "gender isn't real" but want a female president?

[Phunk_Fenomenon]

I swear the contradiction among democrats have no limits.

they also claim that "abortion isn't murder" but if God forbid a pregnant woman gets killed they consider it a "double homicide"

[loveslongnails]

All politicians contradict themselves at some point, but your sweeping generalization that "... (para) democrats contradict (themselves) with no limits" is truly laughable compared to their counterparts who do absolutely NOTHING BUT contradict themselves all day, every day.

Your second statement is verifiably the position of the GOP, not the Dems, so I have no clue where you're pulling this nonsense from. Not only that, but Republicans believe that women should be prosecuted, and HAVE done so, for having miscarriages. Does your uterus-less mind comprehend what a VILE position that is?

Last but not least, do you have anything resembling real data on how many Democrats would agree with your statement that "gender isn't real"? I doubt it. You probably found a few who think that, or a quote by a random Dem here or there, and decided to boost it falsely as if EVERY Democrat thinks like that.

You accuse an entire party of being unable to define what a woman is because, why? My point is you offer zero evidence, zero data, and only conjecture. The facts are that as of the 2024 election, Pew Research found that 65% of ALL voters said gender is determined by your sex at birth. However, 92% of Trump supporters held that few, while Biden supporters were at 39% - 46%.

So there's no contradiction going on here, as you portray, other than you presenting conjecture and what appears to be anecdotal evidence as facts.

Unlike your statement, here at least is a survey by one of the most unbiased and respected data gatherers in the world, to back up mine.

Pew Research

[Phunk_Fenomenon]

Oh how cute.

You’re lecturing me about sweeping generalizations the you immediately jumped to “Republicans believe women should be prosecuted for miscarriages.” That is the exact same thing you just accused me of doing, are you feeling like a scumbag?

Also, your Pew source does not hurt my point like you think it does. Pew found that 59% of Biden supporters say a person’s gender can be different from their sex at birth, while only 39% say sex at birth determines whether someone is a man or woman. So yes, the Democratic side is clearly the side more likely to separate “woman” from biological sex. That is the point.

And I did not say every single Democrat thinks the exact same thing. I am talking about the Democratic Party’s public position and political messaging. Their own 2024 platform supports protections based on gender identity and supports gender-affirming care, while also having whole sections about women’s rights and women’s health. So they treat “woman” as a real category when it helps them politically, but then act like the word is impossible to define when conservatives ask for a clear meaning.

Biden also openly promised in 2020 that he would pick a woman as his running mate. So apparently “woman” was clear enough when Democrats wanted credit for making history.

So no, this is not “zero evidence.” The contradiction is simple: if “woman” is real enough to campaign on, brag about, and write policy for, then it is real enough to define.

[loveslongnails]

" You’re lecturing me about sweeping generalizations the you immediately jumped to “Republicans believe women should be prosecuted for miscarriages.” That is the exact same thing you just accused me of doing, are you feeling like a scumbag?"

"Democratic side is clearly the side more likely to separate “woman” from biological sex. That is the point." - That's correct. That's what the data shows. But you have NO data stipulating that "Democrats want a FEMALE President vs something else. It's not tough to define. Science has already defined, at great pains and length, the difference between biological sex and gender. The GOP platform, note I'm not saying "ALL Conservatives", don't CARE about that difference. Their PLATFORM is it's one and the same.

Regardless, you're right back at it again with shit like "they treat this" or "it helps them", ad naseum. So, we're done here.

Not at all, because the Republican Party of the great shitty state of Texas HAS DONE exactly that, and laws have been proposed and are still being debated to DO exactly that ONLY in Republican controlled states. You might know that if you could do research, scumbag.

[loveslongnails]

The order got flipped here, don't know how. Last paragraph should be the first.

[Billlewis]

Yes, but you've got to admit that it's entertaining, watching them try to placate all these different groups in their hypocrisy.

[Phunk_Fenomenon]

true, is a super good laugh just as long as they leave our children alone

[juliaanita]

To say that dems contradict themselves is pretty rich coming from someone who apparently supports a president who made campaign promises like ending the Ukraine-Russian war in 24 hours, would lower grocery prices on day one, Would balance the federal budget, would not start new wars, would build a wall and Mexico would pay for it, would drain the swamp... I could go on and on and on but it would fill the rest of this website to write them all...

[Phunk_Fenomenon]

Trump’s campaign promises have nothing to do with my question. Nice dodge though, I'll give you that one.

My point was about Democrats contradicting themselves by playing God on sex and gender. Democrats want to say “woman” is a real category when it helps them campaign, brag about firsts, or pick candidates as we saw when Biden openly promised in 2020 that his VP pick would be a woman, and Kamala Harris got in the picture.

Yet when conservatives ask what a woman is, suddenly the word becomes too hard to define for some odd reason.

That is the contradiction.

Trump saying he wanted to end a war, lower prices, or build a wall is a debate about whether a politician fulfilled promises. That is not the same thing as trying to redefine basic biology.

So try again without changing the subject: if “woman” is real enough for Democrats to campaign on, why is it not real enough to define?

[juliaanita]

No, sorry. You try again to understand how vacuous an argument like yours sounds when you twist yourself into rhetorical pretzels with factoids and illogical misdirection even as your mobster president is the embodiment of contradiction, inconsistency, promises not kept, corruption and grift and outright, in the open, theft from taxpayers like you and me. If this is the hill you want to plant your flag on, have at it. But shaking your fist at some perceived slight against the right RE the difference between the words sex and gender, while the mobster president is stealing from us is kind of silly.

[Billlewis]

Sorry, but you've been smoked, and slinging big words around isn't going to help you.

[Phunk_Fenomenon]

@Billlewis its hilarious how she thinks political inconsistency and playing God by trying to defy biology are the same thing.

if anything I think I rather have a "mobster president" that cares about his country and people over a demented old loser who can't walk a flight of stairs without tripping or struggles to exit a stage while caring about the entire world over his own country. while allowing drag shows at our children's schools and confusing them into believing they can automatically change their gender.

I'm also more than happy to plant my flag on any hill, just as long as its my flag and not an LGBTQ or pedophilia flag

[juliaanita]

Cares about his country? Cares about people? in what universe are you parked? I wonder about those who have helped to bring our country to this corrupt and authoritarian adjacent place in history. And I wonder what it is about this website that they congregate here in such numbers. I will gladly lay out the evidence against this mobster from Academics, by Republicans, by attorneys and judges and Democracy watchers all over the world in a private chat with you. Let me know if you are up to such a challenge-the only problem I see is that there will be more words for you to read than pictures for you to look at.

[Billlewis]

I didn't know that was you, Juliaanita. I didn't mean to snap at you.

[Julie_TS]

Complete and utter untruths, and if you want to continue cite your sources, attribute those quotes to who said either of those things. You won't because you can't because no one on the Left, nor any Democrat has said either.

[Phunk_Fenomenon]

I never said the Democrat platform uses the exact words “gender isn’t real.” I said Democrats play games with the word woman, female, girl and all the other words that define any gender.

anyways, unless you live in a cave or sheltered from society, if you were alive and living in America In 2020 then you dont need any evidence or citations when Biden openly promised he would pick a woman for vice president, then chose Kamala Harris. So clearly “woman” meant something when Democrats wanted credit for making history.

But when conservatives on the other hand ask what a woman is, suddenly the word becomes foggy, flexible, and based on personal identity.

So which is it? If “woman” is real enough to campaign on, brag about, and use for historic firsts, then stop acting like conservatives are crazy for saying it has a real meaning.

There’s your source. Now your turn: define “woman” without dodging.

[Chazmatazz269]

www.pewresearch.org/.../

[Chazmatazz269]

tristankatz.substack.com/p/gender-is-a-construct

[Pterodon]

I agree @Julie-TS. Since you’re a democrat define a woman and while you’re at it define an assault rifle too.

[RavVid]

Yeah. I find it funny that some women are unable to define what a woman is but at the same time they are in no doubt about men. Especially white men.

The true genders are men, women and FITHs.

[strateguy632]

yes those liberals 'can't define what a female is' so hypocrit to complain 'we need woman president'. @Julie_TS

[Sevenpointfive]

it's not democrats. they might be in favor but that's not who is doing it. it's social engineering done by the usual suspects

[exitseven]

Democrats make up the rules to fit the narrative.

[Cidknee]

True! Nice observations.😂

[Phunk_Fenomenon]

this video goes beyond my observation

www.tiktok.com/.../7639472725316193550

[FrodoSkywalker007]

They are schizophrenic