Do you beleive that all battles are worth fighting?

[thegreenyogi]

[OneViewpoint]

Of course all battles are not worth fighting. Battle is a costly destructive process by definition.

• You have to consider the cost in resources like time, money, etc.
• You need to consider the opportunity cost. Could you be doing something more important and beneficial.
• You need to consider the odds of winning... or losing and the impact of those outcomes.
• You need to consider if the timing is right or if this battle would better suit you at some point if the future.
• Consider if you can fight this battle by proxy using a 3rd party player motivated to achieve the goal you want to achieve.
• Also consider if cooperation would be a better strategy than battle.

[MisterWack]

I don’t believe all battles are worth fighting.
Although if every political battle looked like this, then I would fight every time with my vote.
What is worth fighting for is my best interests at heart, from my perspective.

A campaign founded on housing for all, medicare for all, and an affordable life in a grassroots campaign talking to me rather than talking down to me that are consistent with their messaging are my best interests so, it will always be a battle worth fighting for with my vote.

[HawkPerception]

Definitely not. I hate to say it, but I'd honestly be a deserter when it comes to military drafts. I don't care enough for my country. They make such stupid decisions with the money and give zero fucks about you. The only people I'd fight for are my close loved ones. I'm not dying for some political leaders pissing contest.

And then if we're talking about arguing, there's a saying...

"You can beat 40 scholars with one fact, but you cannot beat one idiot with 40 facts."

No point arguing with idiots. Better to just stay quiet and let them hold their stupid beliefs than waste time and energy on them

[Lliam]

No. Only unavoidable ones that are worth fighting for. Few battles are worth it. You can walk away from stupid ones. You can use reason, diplomacy or compromise to resolve others.
There is a saying. "Choose your battles." You don't have to win every time for ego's sake. That can be counterproductive. Sometimes being the better man means setting aside your ego.

[Chazmatazz269]

Nope. Some of the best advice i’ve ever read goes something like this…
Choose your battles carefully that they are big enough to matter but small enough to win. I learned that lesson the hard way long before i read it. I strongly recommend people who tend to fight a lot take this advice to heart.

[FreyaRed]

No. Price > effort > risk calculation is always necessary before starting a battle.

[Spencer10]

Definitely not... sometimes discretion IS the better part of valor.

[RavVid]

No. Often matters resolve themselves by themselves. Only fight battles that are necessary.

[Iron_Man]

Only important battles that count not meaningless battles that are trivial, and mean nothing.

[msc545]

Absolutely. Not. Many, if not, most battles are not worth fighting.

[exitseven]

Nope, but there are some thst definitley worth it

[loveslongnails]

absolutely not

[Paige2006]

Some are and some aren't

[canamlusciouslad73]

H**L to the NO!!!

[bear34]

That depends on the reason.

[sage2021]

No. 🙂‍↔️

[Cidknee]

No..

[noohair]

No way.

[In_Trance]

Nope