we all know that wikipedia pages have edit option. any non technician can change technical stuff. britanicca and new world don't allow that!
any non historian can change it to their 'vision or version or narrative". we all know they have 'edit wars' and managers of wikipedia decide the version that will be locked.
in contrast to paper encyclopedia or
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Culture
That i recommend and use.
Many examples wiki admins chose the 'hate jew' version. the main purpose to have a vast 'pretend information site' is: to show things with the slant and desirable wording'. look at this example:
countries said 'not call it genocide until court' so it realy "DEPENDS" if it will be called genocide. but instead of 'depends' look at the desirable version.

the recognition of genocide is coming. from 14 countries who DID NOT SAY that recognition is 'forthcoming'. do you still have doubts about the main purpose?
a europen court. we all know how europeans feel about jews and did to jews. those european judges. so wikipedia doesn't say 'depends' on the court! we all know 'exactly what is coming' but *insted of an appearance of balanced truth, now it 'depends' so: now not considered genocide unless european judges say yes. cough. they *hav the word: "forthcoming"! see for yourself.
the assumption is not presented as 'innocent until proof' but israel army that is jews get treated different. treated worse. discrimination.
the desirable word, as wikipedia management desired: when accused, and before judges examine evidence, is 'guilty and recognition is forthcoming'. instead of 'depends'. still have doubts?
Girl's Behavior
Guy's Behavior
Flirting
Dating
Relationships
Fashion & Beauty
Health & Fitness
Marriage & Weddings
Shopping & Gifts
Technology & Internet
Break Up & Divorce
Education & Career
Entertainment & Arts
Family & Friends
Food & Beverage
Hobbies & Leisure
Other
Religion & Spirituality
Society & Politics
Sports
Travel
Trending & News
What Girls & Guys Said
Opinion
5Opinion
The main purpose of Wikipedia is to share info. What they neglect to mention is that it has a leftist bent and if you correct certain lies you will get IP banned from editing because leftist lies are the truth even if you can prove otherwise.
For example, a foreigner living in Japan who researched history decided to write history books, what he didn’t tell Japanese people was that in the international version sold in other countries he wrote history books fanfiction making Yasuke more important than the servant he actually was, and Japan didn’t realize until people where whining about the Assasins Creed in Japan game.
Wikipedia is fine for stuff leftists doesn’t hate or love, but there is a good reason teachers used to say to not cite Wikipedia as a source.
it is just a pack of lies. I hired a technician form my department and I poked around online to see what I could find anything bad about him. He was listed in Wikipedia as being in one of Hulk Hogan's movies. I asked him about it and he said that a kid he went to school with bet him he couldn;t do it. So he put himself in one of Hulk's movies to win a bet.
I personally edited articles on Wikipedia and had it removed without explanation. It has an extreme leftist lean and I've also seen a pro islamist sector as well. In my opinion, it's not better than reddit. It's an echo chamber that can pretend to be legitimate.
They are not accurate and most times they are wrong
Wikipedia is woke garbage
that is how they chose name wiki just odd letters adjusted from word woke.
Be the first girl to share an opinion
and earn 3 more Xper points!