What do you think of Republicans confirming an AG who's in deep shit with a judge right now for ignoring a bipartisan law about abused children?

[Anonymous]

This is @goaded.

Really. Blanch just got given the position of the highest ranking law enforcement officer in the USA while breaking the law and also accidentally saying he's Trump's attorney during the confirmation hearings.

Updates

18 d

"The day after his swearing-in, his Justice Department filed a brief backing Trump's private lawyers in their effort to overturn a federal judge's sanctions order — an order that had put Trump's IRS settlement in serious jeopardy."

They want to give Trump a blank cheque to commit tax fraud.

[fishbone77]

A July 2026 Washington Examiner piece (timed with Blanche’s Senate confirmation hearing) argued that children facing a “growing sexual exploitation crisis” need a strong AG champion, that Blanche could fill that role, and that he specifically needed to fulfill neglected legal duties under this Act (and a related 2018 restitution law for child pornography victims). It detailed a long record of non-compliance or late submissions by prior AGs of both parties (Holder, Lynch, Sessions, Barr, Garland, Bondi), with only a minority of the required reports submitted and many late.

[Asker]

"The Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA) is a law passed by the 119th United States Congress and signed by President Donald Trump on November 19, 2025. It requires the U. S. attorney general to "make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format" all files (the "Epstein files") pertaining to the prosecution of the deceased child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (if needed, declassifying them to the extent possible) within 30 days of passage, and then to give the Judiciary Committees in both the U. S. House of Representatives and the U. S. Senate an unredacted "list of all government officials and politically exposed persons" named in the files."

Blanche has covered up the perpetrators and exposed the victims, instead.

[fishbone77]

lol. you didn't give two shits about Epstein while Biden was president. Spare me your pearl clutching.

[Asker]

If Biden had released the files, Trump would have claimed it was an attack on him. The question is why is the chief law-enforcement official of the USA breaking the law?

[fishbone77]

bahaha. you guys don't mind attacking Trump. He failed you.

[exitseven]

Todd Blanche will go after people that up until now thought that they were above the law. He also was President Trump's lawyer during the democrat lawfare campaign to prevent him from returning the the White House If Democrsts return to power in the house , the impeachments will begin again and Todd Blanche has experience in this.

[DryGermanGuy]

Will he also indict Barack HUSSEIN Obama for having a forged birth certificate?

[exitseven]

@DryGermanGuy It's a possibility. Nobody is above the law.

[DryGermanGuy]

Let’s show this insolent colored boy who is boss in Trumpland!!! 💪

[canamlusciouslad73]

Such as people who don't blow your Massa 24/7/365/366, exitseven.

[exitseven]

Thanks for the MHO😎

[canamlusciouslad73]

Except Trump !!!

[Anonymous]

Hopefully the slush fund to Jan 6 insurrectionists is dead at least

[Asker]

I bet you anything he'll bring it back in some form. It wasn't even necessary; they're handing out taxpayer money to insurrectionists regardless.

Worse is the whole immunity from tax for the Trump family!

[Opinion Owner]

Just for 2 more years, then hopefully he is aggressively audited again

[Asker]

No, it's a dodgy "settlement" from his own government. Judges are dubious. We can hope for the best.

[Pterodon]

What do you think of Biden putting a woman on the SCOTUS that couldn’t even define a woman

[canamlusciouslad73]

BUCK FLANCHE !!!